Topics created by JaredBusch

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@pete-s said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

@jaredbusch said in I'm not a php dev, so what do you all think of this patch:

I just submitted this as a pull request to FreePBX's User Manager module.

I think it looks clean, but curious to what someone with more day to day PHP skills thinks about it.

Context matters when it comes to coding style. Do you have a link to the original source code?

The actual git is public as long as you are logged in to Attlasian.
https://git.freepbx.org/projects/FREEPBX/repos/userman/browse
They have a copy on Github but that is no longer kept in sync (apparently it is).
https://github.com/FreePBX/userman

Your code looks fine. It looks just like the original.

https://git.freepbx.org/projects/FREEPBX/repos/userman/browse/views/welcome.php

It is a pull request, it should.

I was discussing WHAT i did in my change, hence the diff in post 1.
Mostly using the ternary structure like I did.

Yeah, that was what I was commenting. It's fine.

In general if...then...else is clearer than ? to read but it also clearer to not put many php tags back to back. But that is how the original is done. So what you've done is inline with how it is written.

The only very minor thing I could find, would be to not use ' and " in the same statement, unless there is a reason for it.

So instead of:

<?php echo _(sizeof($directories)==1 ? " selected":'')?>

it would probably be better to do:

<?php echo _(sizeof($directories)==1 ? ' selected' : '') ?>

(easier to read when you're consistent with white space as well)

It will work either way so...

meant to use ' that was a miss on me.

Fingers crossed. The 4Chan crap there did them the favour of getting them a LOT of attention.

@dashrender said in Phishing rules versus poor translations:

Garage office getting an upgrade?

Customer site. The 5 year old Black & Decker unit they had died.

@jaredbusch said in User email search in Exchange Online:

@dbeato said in User email search in Exchange Online:

However if you go through a group of folders that are narrowed down, it is hard to do.

Mostly, I want to exclude some folders (full of system emails) and deleted. All of which are returned if you use all folders.

The work around, is to click the folder, then click in search and use the recent to pop what you want.
c5162fcc-b2f1-4666-b46b-d692d174a9e0-image.png

Not as convenient as Outlook's search folder functionality.

But no Windows and no Outlook is a bonus.

Eventually a patch will come out for OpenEMR. Pathcing is pretty simply.

Check for a patch file

As of this writing patch 2 is out:
https://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/OpenEMR_Patches

Download the patch file cd /var/www/html/openemr sudo wget https://www.open-emr.org/patch/6-0-0-Patch-2.zip sudo unzip 6-0-0-Patch-2.zip Answer A to replace all files.

8cd42203-f824-483b-b74b-d9a34a59fcc1-image.png

Delete the downloaded patch file sudo rm 6-0-0-Patch-2.zip Set apache as the owner of everything again. sudo chown -R apache:apache /var/www/html Recursively set the folder httpd_sys_rw for SELinux again sudo semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t "/var/www/html/openemr(/.*)?" sudo restorecon -FR /var/www/html/openemr/ Run the SQL Patch page

https://12.34.56.78/sql_patch.php

Delete the SQL patch file sudo rm sql_patch.php Update completed.

In the end I tried RHEL and OEL for the project.

RHEL uses EPEL.

OEL has their own EPEL repo.

I'm using this on my office machine now for personal files. It works great!

@hobbit666 said in VMWare vulnerabiliy being actively exploited:

1st on my Monday job list

We patched our stuff last week.

@jaredbusch and now Im running into this as well. Thank You for your steps!

@JaredBusch Did you ever find a product that you liked for this?

I am looking for 1 PoE outdoor camera for the front of my house. I ran the Cat6 line years ago and I just need to buy the camera now.

One team at the client that I needed to do something for immediately was already using ClickUp.

So the principal there decided to expand that use.

Suggestions were helpful.

@jaredbusch said in Vultr performance issues in Chicago:

@jaredbusch said in Vultr performance issues in Chicago:

@dashrender said in Vultr performance issues in Chicago:

yeah, in my case that's not working much, because most calls are getting to the PBX, but there is a ton of dead air and dropped calls.

Yes, that is the issue with intermittent connectivity. usually up enough for the trunks not to be failed.

For me it was < 30 minutes for any one customer to be having issues.

Things seem to have normalized, but Vultr still has the issue open.

And Chicago is marked cleared now.

8c36a9a9-0564-4df1-8ad8-6477ea725699-image.png

I didn't see what it said before seeing the "resolved issues" at the top...

@pete-s said in HP Switch config question:

The person who set this up would clearly know what he was doing or he wouldn't have been able to make it work.

I'm guessing it was a move in the making. The intention was probably to move over to pfsense, drop the fortigate and perhaps remove routing from the switch. It's possible the fortigate is old and can't handle routing at line speed, hence the L3 routing in the switch.

I'm guessing the fortigate and the switch was setup long before pfsense.

If the fortigate is the actual edge device, maybe this was setup as a simple way to bypass the pfsense for fussy devices or troubleshooting?

I could see setting something like this up so that you can tell a remote user "go plug it into xyz switch and let me know if it starts working"

@jaredbusch said in Upgrading to Fedora 34:

@stacksofplates said in Upgrading to Fedora 34:

I don't care for the new Windows-esque "installing updates don't power off your computer" screen on a reboot that was introduced in 34.

It was in 33 also if you did a clean install.

Ah I haven't used it in a while. I just saw it mentioned the other day.

Had the user install the outlook app.

“Oh this is much better”

Problem solved.

@stuartjordan said in Once off or short term remote access solution:

@jaredbusch Do you have to install the remote plugin and login with your gmail account to access the machine though?

I have ConnectWise installed for me.

@skyetel said in Business number texting services:

Here's a preview:
Screen Shot 2021-05-20 at 9.46.17 AM.png

It's still in development, but we're really excited about it.

Need help testing?

So the final answer for this question is, yes. Upgrades are normally smooth.

But the 2.5 branch has some issues , so hold off.

b4ded3c7-aab2-45c6-99e0-cbc763138d99-image.png