I am curious why you are assigning permissions to users rather than groups (or at least it looks that way as the groups are non descriptive).

Also is sba1, sba2 and @sba1 all users or groups?

@thecreativeone91 said:

If I remember right the DL160 is pretty much useless as a normal server. I've seen cheap people use them as that but they are really meant to be used in a high density web farm.

You are thinking of the right one. It's slightly better than the DL140, but only in that it has SCSI instead of ATA drives. It's not meant to be a standard server at all. Lacks all the server hardware and is no more reliable than a nice desktop. Lacks full IPMI and other tooling.

@scottalanmiller said:

It does? Everytime I've looked in the last few years, it had been removed.

I was going to check again to confirm, but it looks like you cannot even see anything without signing up for a logmein account. Screw that.

Microsoft likes making new names to make things sound cool. Using Office 365 as a code name for subscription licensing is super confusing. But they love doing that.

I setup a C@C FreePBX system 2 weeks ago now.. I'm using Google voice for my SIP trunk, I have a Dev 2 box for it - I think I've invested around $90 in it so far.

I haven't used it very much though so I'm not sure how the long term sound quality will be. I am planning on trying to use this for my home phone replacement though.

I need to pickup this up, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/shb10/angela2.pdf so I have some portable phones at home. They are a bit pricey... but We'll see how they work. Though I am disappointed I have to use their basestation and that the phones don't connect directly to WIFI.

The direct to WIFI ones are like $300+ each. OUCH!

@g.jacobse said:

It's about what I thought - while cool it's not practical to try to drag old tech into the present. While the idea of having 'one' unit with four computer is kind of nice,... it's impractical.

And the power requirements are going to be higher.

After the power costs are considered getting something new from Dell or SuperMicro would actually probably cost less!

http://www.ytddownloader.com/

Another mention for a good tool.

Update i am using iSpy64 V6.2.9.0 working fine now, but i can only add 4 IP Cameras.
I can access the ip through web browser but if i'm adding it using the "Ip Camera Wizard" it showing that the Camera is disconnecte 😞

@thecreativeone91 I will try your suggestion.

@nadnerB said:

Alternatively, they might have some kind of national level disaster mitigation strategy that we know nothing about. It's not our place to judge their business strategies as we are not privy to that information.

Well, it is our place, as it is part of determining how and when you do business or what type of business with the country. Having the government behave as a Comcast, for example, means that datacenters and datacenter service companies avoid the country and go to other countries entirely for services. It means that critical support systems and banking goes to another country because needed redundancy and expertise is not available. If you are in IT, then the infrastructure and decisions of a country are very much something you have to consider.

@scottalanmiller said:

Remember, Linux is not an OS so the question as to "how" to do this can't be answered unless we know which Linux you are considering.

At least you (or him primarily) didn't say GNU/Linux, I'd have puked all over myself

I can't believe you people, Microsoft works hard for that money and... lol I can't even finish this sentence.

While Apple might be non-competitive, that's a normal and completely legal and acceptable business practice. There is no law nor any standard code of ethics that says that you need to promote your competitor's products. There are good reasons to sometimes do so, but that's very different.

Remember that both Microsoft and Google actually have or have had near monopolies in some sectors while Apple never has.

@Dashrender said:

Definitely upgrade.

I agree with the 635 though - I have one, I really like it even though I'm running beta Windows 10 on it and it has issues.. they are beta issues I live with.

Now I'm waiting on the 640 XL

I have the Lumia 1520. Running 8.1. I like it pretty well. I tried the 920 a couple years ago one 8 and hated it because of some of the issues and lack of apps back then. Now all the appps expect my SSL VPN are there. I tried windows 10 on it. I can't do it. I use windows 10 one my laptop and can live with temprory usability issues but I can't live with the design issues of text being outside of bounding boxes etc that windows 10 preview had on the 1520.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@Rob-Dunn said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

Here are some open source packages:

http://open-audit.org/

Open Audit hasn't been updated in FOREVER (like since 2007), but it was kinda cool in that the inventory submission occurred via HTTP. I was a big advocate of this before I had moved to Spiceworks.

The latest version was released this month https://community.opmantek.com/display/OA/Release+Notes+for+Open-AudIT+v1.6.4

Ah - I gave up on him, but he's been touting version 2.0 since as long as I can remember...

Have you tried this? No experience firsthand with faxing with FreePBX. Usually I'd recommend Elastix for that. Has built in packages to accommodate faxing. Otherwise, try this:

yum -y install spanDSP libtiff libtiff-devel

@thecreativeone91 True. For an amateur hack such as myself it'll replace PS but not for a pro.

www.theguardian.com/media/2015/apr/24/comcast-confirms-time-warner-cable-merger-off

This one was an easy fix, but that the issue exists at all is a fragility unique to FreeNAS that does not exist if you only use FreeBSD:

http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/911053-freenas-database-corrupt

@scottalanmiller In your country cheaper because your country is developed in many aspects.

@Rob-Dunn said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@Rob-Dunn maybe my rules are just really basic or something, but they seem to work better in OWA than in Outlook, or at least on parity.

Actually, I should correct myself, I mean 'views' more than rules...I do some stuff with font styles, organization, etc. with the views...something that is not really workable in OWA.

That makes more sense. No views for me. I have lots of server side rules and they, well, rule!