@johnhooks said:

semanage port -m -t http_port_t -p tcp 4567

I had to add semanage first but then it worked.

Just installed the sync tool on my windows as well and it's not heavy plus the sync settings i mentioned on my MAC, automatically worked on windows too (sync specific folders & files). Not sure if ODFB works the same way, but for me one of the reasons we are thinking between O365 SP onlive vs box and leaning towards box is the sync tools for all platforms, (When i tried preview of ODFB on our MAC, it crashed both on Yosemite and El Captian), plus of course the unlimited storage.

@Dashrender said:

Does this mean the name Xen is finally dead? can we stop worrying about it? Xen = XenServer and XenServer = Xen?

Nope, nothing of the sort. XenServer and Xen remain identical to what they have always been year after year. XenServer is a Xen distribution. That is never going to change. Xen is the hypervisor, XenServer is the distro.

Just like CentOS and Linux will always remain separate things. CentOS is an OS built on Linux, Linux is the kernel.

@scottalanmiller said:

@Dashrender said:

From a consumer perspective, yes the UI is a major factor.. in fact, I'd go so far as to call it the only factor. Another factor might be compatibility with previous versions, but then again, maybe not.

Okay but is consumer perspective relevant? If so, there is no point in even knowing the product. By that perspective many people in the 2000s actually thought that Linux was the new version of Windows and that LibreOffice was the upgrade to MS Office 2003.

I'd argue that being "easily fooled by unrelated things" does not make the opinion applicable. I understand that people who know nothing about the product only care about things they see and that they are easily fooled. But by that logic, fake Coach handbags ARE Coach handbags rather than knockoffs.

LOL Touche!

@scottalanmiller said:

Even if you could:

Get it to run in Outlook and Get it past the other company's filters and Not get your company blocked from sending them emails....

Then you would still face...

OWA won't run VBScript Most Outlook will not run VBScript No non-MS system will run VBScript

and brings us right back to

@JaredBusch said:

That is easy. The answer is you cannot and it was a colossal waste of money on your company's part to even try.

The one big difference is that snowflake firms (or any size) tend to lean towards platform-based, agentless backups while DevOps firms almost never take platform-based backups because they have no need to ever restore a full VM, only the data.

The one feature that I really loved with 3CX was the incredible ease of setting up soft phones over a VPN. They do that beautifully.

Note, always give back..
Posted the corrections to their documentations as a pull request to github.
https://github.com/NodeBB/nodebb-english/pull/68

@scottalanmiller said:

@Carnival-Boy said:

And what do you mean "this is done by default in Windows 10"? The Quick Edit mode isn't checked on my PC (and I don't understand why I would want it to be).

That's odd, on by default here.

Yep, just check in 1511, enabled here.

Symantec (6+ years ago) had a completely different product that they wanted VM based customers to use instead of BE. I didn't want to manage two products so I bailed.

I hate searching this site...

I swear there was a thread with a walk through on setting up nginx as a proxy for multiple servers....

Anyone know where it is?

@BBigford said:

I've been looking for the GUID entries in SCCM 2012 but have been unable to find them. When a machine is reimaged by SCCM, I was under the impression that it does indeed log the machines entry in SCCM. Google has evaded me... do you know where they get stored at in 2012?

2012 is different to 2007 in that you don't need to go hunting for the GUID unless you are digging through the database.

That being said...

If you go to Assets and Compliance --> Overview --> Devices, you can add the GUID column by right clicking any of the column titles and selecting ID. Deleting the device from here also deletes it from the database.

@JaredBusch said:

@art_of_shred said:

I'd say that is a good bit of information to have, but who is going to be moving PBX VM's midday? 😛

For me it was good to know that it works that smoothly, not because I plan to ever move one during the day. But because if I HAVE to move one during the day, I will be confident that it will work.

You did notice I up-voted your post? I was just messing with ya. Yeah, that was a valuable test, for sure.

It is only a file system change, so while there is storage risk there is not essentially any system level risks, if that makes sense. The risk here is pretty much that the files corrupt in the process (or the entire filesystem does.) It should be extremely reliable but should anything go wrong, there is essentially no concern around the platform not continuing to work and so a restore is all that would be needed.

Looks like SPICE could do it, found this comment on Wikipedia:

Xspice
The X.Org Server driver for the QXL framebuffer device includes a wrapper script[11] which makes it possible to launch an Xorg server whose display is exported via the SPICE protocol. This enables use of SPICE in a remote desktop environment, without requiring QEMU/KVM virtualization.

@JaredBusch said:

I have never heard of a provider that required a separate trunk for inbound and outbound. that is just crazy.

So, is this just a Vitelity issue? I know many SIP providers have their subtle differences, and you always seem to find them at the most inopportune moments.

@Dashrender said:

what resolution is your laptop? The last time I run VBox on my 3200 x 1800 resulted in a pretty much useless situation with it.

1600x900

Some KDE Plasma application shots...

0_1447459934210_konversation.png

0_1447459943341_kopete.png