@JaredBusch That's nuts!

@black3dynamite said in MS weird Hyper-V 2019 pull ?:

@Emad-R said in MS weird Hyper-V 2019 pull ?:

@black3dynamite said in MS weird Hyper-V 2019 pull ?:

@Emad-R said in MS weird Hyper-V 2019 pull ?:

@Emad-R

Another Reason why KVM is superior.

Btw I tried Hyper V manager on Win10, and used Gen2 VMs as oppose to using my standard VMware Workstation or Player or VirtualBox, and I was unable to complete the OS install cause it did some checkups on the VM and ISO and told me that the licensing was not valid, however I think cause I slipstreamed offline updates on the ISO that caused the issue.

It feels when you even wish to try MS stuff, they try to give you the finger some how.

How much RAM did you assign to the VM?

It was not RAM issue, it literraly came up and told me you dont have valid license

e85ca49c-edc1-449d-a868-a7084bd18e1a-image.png

The same ISO works perfectly in VMware, what they think we should buy stuff and support without testing it first for the first decade or so.

This is why I asked about the RAM.

https://blog.workinghardinit.work/2014/09/05/fixing-windows-cannot-find-the-microsoft-software-license-terms-make-sure-the-installation-sources-are-valid-and-restart-the-installation-or-windows-installation-encountered-an-un/

http://blog.powerbiz.net.au/server-2012/hyper-v-and-the-windows-cannot-find-the-microsoft-software-license-terms-error/

Ok I give you that, A feature that they enabled called
dynamic memory
breaks the install of their very own Win10 install. Even though they could have made better error log.

But when I wanted to use VMware Worksation again i was blocked. It gave me another error after Hyper-V got installed. Like WTF breaking the leader in Virtualization to promote your own shit. apparently Vmware WS and Hyper-V can not go exist. so i said screw it, never again, I will learn hyper V if i was forced in company but no need to bother with it now .

@JaredBusch said in Call Out from FreePBX Conference Room:

@scottalanmiller said in Call Out from FreePBX Conference Room:

@JaredBusch said in Call Out from FreePBX Conference Room:

Hit transfer, hit the conference extension, dial the participant code, speak their name, hit the transfer button again. The idiot will be in the conference.

I've tried that, always seem to get stuck with the "enter a code" issue.

You are going to force me to test those instructions aren't you?

Tested what I typed above.. Works perfectly.

@IRJ said in AV - should companies keep buying it?:

@Dashrender said in AV - should companies keep buying it?:

@scottalanmiller said in AV - should companies keep buying it?:

@Dashrender said in AV - should companies keep buying it?:

Well then - I guess most of the world is idiots

That should fall into the "well duh" category. Of course most of the world is idiots.

Along this line - the boss wants me to add to my duties - I now get to train our users on how to use a computer as well as how to be security minded. i.e. don't plug in random USB sticks into a computer, etc.

You aren't blocking USB drives today?

nope.
That was just one example.

Then there is the need to still use DVDs around here - that one I couldn't block.

@Dashrender said in MS's plans for Windows 10?:

WAT? Windows 10 was released in July 2015, so if he purchased them in March of 2015, no they wouldn't have Windows 10 rights. If he purchased them post July 2015, then maybe, but not 100%, it will have rights for Windows 10 - many manufacturers sold Windows 7 licenses only after the release of Windows 10.

Everyone had full upgrade rights, no complications, for quite a while when first released. Even if your current OS was older.

Thanks that is nice info

You may want to try:

Get-ADUser -Filter * -Properties *|Select SamAccountName,HomeDirectory,HomeDrive

and see if that returns what you are looking for.

@Emad-R said in Veeeeeeerrrrrryyyyy long paths and filenames:

@JasGot

Robocopy

Geeez. I use Robocopy all the time, I can't believe I didn't think of that!

Thanks for the tickler!

@jmoore said in Spare box is sitting idle. I7 32GB RAM. Which flavor should I run:

@scotth My workstation at work is kvm with fedora under it. I use windows 10 and opensuse vm's under it through virtual machine manager. It works very smooth and never had a bit of trouble.

I never tried OpenSuse. After I get this going, I'm going to setup Hyper-V on my brother's server. I may give it a go. He's running Kodi on Windows which works fine. I want to setup a Kodi only box and feed it out. I'm doing this at home on XCP-ng and it works great. I use the Emby addon and it streams beautiful to anything in the house no matter the original resolution.

@JROK said in Upgrading to E3 from Business Premium O365 ADConnect:

@wrx7m said in Upgrading to E3 from Business Premium O365 ADConnect:

Okta

Mostly want to make sure upgrading will not affect the sync portion.

AADC you can use if you have AAD. I don't think it depends on any user licenses specifically.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2

Originator Fields

The originator fields of a message consist of the from field, the
sender field (when applicable), and optionally the reply-to field.
The from field consists of the field name "From" and a comma-
separated list of one or more mailbox specifications. If the from
field contains more than one mailbox specification in the mailbox-
list, then the sender field, containing the field name "Sender" and a
single mailbox specification, MUST appear in the message. In either
case, an optional reply-to field MAY also be included, which contains
the field name "Reply-To" and a comma-separated list of one or more
addresses.

from = "From:" mailbox-list CRLF

sender = "Sender:" mailbox CRLF

reply-to = "Reply-To:" address-list CRLF

The originator fields indicate the mailbox(es) of the source of the
message. The "From:" field specifies the author(s) of the message,
that is, the mailbox(es) of the person(s) or system(s) responsible
for the writing of the message. The "Sender:" field specifies the
mailbox of the agent responsible for the actual transmission of the
message. For example, if a secretary were to send a message for
another person, the mailbox of the secretary would appear in the
"Sender:" field and the mailbox of the actual author would appear in
the "From:" field. If the originator of the message can be indicated by a single mailbox and the author and transmitter are identical, the "Sender:" field SHOULD NOT be used. Otherwise, both fields SHOULD appear.

Note: The transmitter information is always present. The absence
of the "Sender:" field is sometimes mistakenly taken to mean that
the agent responsible for transmission of the message has not been
specified. This absence merely means that the transmitter is
identical to the author and is therefore not redundantly placed
into the "Sender:" field.

The originator fields also provide the information required when
replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it
indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests
that replies be sent. In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field,
replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the
"From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the
reply.

In all cases, the "From:" field SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that
does not belong to the author(s) of the message. See also section
3.6.3 for more information on forming the destination addresses for a
reply.

@JaredBusch said in Resolved - Postfix on Fedora 29 - Why Can't I Send Mail?:

@wrx7m said in Resolved - Postfix on Fedora 29 - Why Can't I Send Mail?:

It applied to the instance (multiple servers)

FFS no. That is not what anything is.

It applied to the Account. Which contains multiple instances.
Instances that could be servers or desktops or WTF ever.

My apologies. I meant to put account.

@JaredBusch said in Error - SELinux is Preventing Vmtoolsd From Entrypoint Access On the File /usr/bin/bash:

@wrx7m said in Error - SELinux is Preventing Vmtoolsd From Entrypoint Access On the File /usr/bin/bash:

My question - Is this permanent?

Yes

Thanks!

@Emad-R I use it with Nginx all the time, I use it with Apache too, but I couldn't tell you about performance difference because I never bothered to benchmark it.
As for separation, I do use it in separate docker containers, I think all my instances connect to Nginx. The only place I use it with Apache is on the same VPS, but I see no reason you couldn't separate them and use TCP to connect.

In case anyone else is interested...

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/paulcarroty/Gnome_3.32/

hi @mhamed, if you are solved this step i need your help because I'm currently working on same Project .

@dbeato said in Office 365 Moving Emails to Deleted Items:

@dafyre said in Office 365 Moving Emails to Deleted Items:

@dbeato said in Office 365 Moving Emails to Deleted Items:

@dafyre said in Office 365 Moving Emails to Deleted Items:

e got a strange one... I have a user here whose Emails go from whatever folder they are in to the Deleted Items folder after being read... Sometimes. Sometimes it doesn't happen for several minutes, and other times it happens right away.
The user hasn't been phished that we can tell. No bogus rules in Outlook forwarding things to the deleted items. Check both Web and Outlook 2016.
What am I not looking at that could be causing this?

They got hacked though
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/office365security/how-to-fix-a-compromised-hacked-microsoft-office-365-account/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/securitycompliance/responding-to-a-compromised-email-account

Sometimes the rule is a dot on the name....

I am assuming it's a hacked account, but we changed the password to a new one. I disconnected all of her sessions from Office 365.

Still happening. I see no rules with a dot in the name... or spaces or foreign characters. I see exactly the number of rules on my CLI as I do in Outlook and OWA.

Can you clear them all ? Take a screenshot of the settings and then remove them and see what changes. The rules run autonomously and is not someone running them.

That's what we've done now. All of the rules are disabled. End-user is turning them back on one at a time now.

@Emad-R said in Download Windows Server 2019:

@scottalanmiller

https://software-download.microsoft.com/download/sg/17763.253.190108-0006.rs5_release_svc_refresh_SERVER_EVAL_x64FRE_en-us.iso

Thanks @Emad-R with this link you don't have to go through all the paperwork.

They are "migrating" one of my instances due to significant packet loss. This is what mine has said for 2 hours now.