Trusty full sources.list only difference is I get the mx repos

# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main

Planning to test this out soon.

@jaredbusch said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:

@brrabill said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:

Gotta love Ubuntu.

not really.

FFS can't you tell that was sarcasm?

Hey ... I kind of like this FFS-ing and yelling at people! It's fun after a long day!

Trying to figure out if I should learn Ansible or Salt Stack.... hm..... Thoughts?

I am studying for my RHCSA... so maybe Ansible makes since?

@travisdh1 making a sql file is a pain in the ass.

Look at my Nextcloud 11 guide for the simpler way to handle that and securing mariadb.

The Register uses the term "enterprise Linux" to qualify the RHEL/Suse/Ubuntu group.

Maybe calling them USR would work better.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/09/microsoft_eye_from_the_linux_guy/

@Grey said in Calling All Grandmas!:

There's a whole youtube channel devoted to this concept, Scott.

I love the constant sighing.

@mlnews said in How to configure Ubuntu Linux server as a Domain Controller:

http://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-configure-ubuntu-linux-server-as-a-domain-controller-with-samba-tool/

Samba 4 and samba-tool make getting up and running with AD on Linux pretty quick and easy.

Sounds nice, I'll need to make time to look at this.

This one is quite reputable on Distrowatch as well:
https://elementary.io/

@thwr said in Fedora Server for production use?:

@stacksofplates said in Fedora Server for production use?:

@thwr said in Fedora Server for production use?:

Interesting: Fedora 25 starts to panic with RAM < 512MB at the beginning of the kernel init phase, even in text mode. Just had a look at the manual which clearly says that Fedora requires 1GB of RAM.

Looks like I'm out of luck and have to stick to Ubuntu / Debian.

Another thing to note is with RHEL/CentOS 7.3 they recommend a 1GB boot partition instead of 512MB.

Just an aside.

Should work as long as you keep an eye on it. Ubuntu for example likes to keep old kernel and initrd images there until you clean them up (e.g. apt autoclean etc)

Ya I usually keep 3 and remove the others but I think the images are getting big enough they needed to adjust the size. If you do anew install it defaults to 1GB.

0_1485979989423_upload-eac96def-3233-451e-94e1-38891c8ca962

I guess I could do a wildcard at the beginning and end of whatever I'm searching for with killall but that freaks me out a little. I could accidentally do a lot of damage with that.

@Dashrender said in Wine 2.0 Released:

@dafyre said in Wine 2.0 Released:

Since @Dashrender privately chastised me for trying to test something over RDP, I figured I'd publicly announce that it plays fine when sitting in front of the machine, lol.

hehe

A minor issue that I'm starting to notice in Windowed mode is that when you move the mouse to the bottom edge of the screen, it doesn't scroll down. Left, right, and top seem to work.

There's also no easy way to ALT+TAB out of it -- even in windowed mode.

Expensive, but looks like some really great hardware. I could definitely get by with a less expensive model.

@wirestyle22 said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@scottalanmiller said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@wirestyle22 said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@scottalanmiller said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@dafyre said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@scottalanmiller said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

@Francesco-Provino said in GoboLinux: Experimenting with a New Filesystem Hierarchy:

I found traditional Unix hierarchy more confortable for interactive shell use, Mac os X is a pain with all that capital letters. Seems like a tribute to the "case seinsitive".

Yeah, this is unnecessarily complicated.

To further muddy the waters, on a default install of OS X (10.11 in my case), things are not case sensitive. However, you can set that option if you partition the drives yourself.

Well yeah, OSX is just ridiculous.

I came very close to getting a job at ABC but they wanted Mac experience (Guru was the word they used). The guy who got the job lied through his teeth (my friends works there and explained it to me). Being an honest person is hard sometimes.

Who was dishonest? The guy or the company that happily hired someone without experience?

They had no one with Mac experience to really test the guy properly but he knew his stuff generally. Then it came time for him to do something really simple (i honestly forget what its been a while) and he didn't know how to. 😞

And they kept him on even though he lied? If so, then they did too.