I'm a bad one to ask for this because I only have my RHCSA. I don't know why I don't do more certs, I still do all of the learning for these things, Im just not a good test taker so I think that makes me hold back a lot when I look at this stuff.
@JaredBusch The device is tied to the numeric extension, it lets you set the device's username to whatever you want.
The better question is why are you even thinking this is a good idea?
What benefit are you thinking you are gaining by using a non-standard approach?
All this does is complicate things by putting a random value in a place that is normally something that matches the extension. This is a 1 to 1 tie between this informaiton and the extension. There is no benefit to this.
Only after you've pigeon-holed yourself into that 1 to 1 relationship.
No, it is a 1 to 1 relationship regardless of if you use the extension or a name or a fuck01.
That auth name is 100% tied 1 to 1 to the extension.
And cell phones have allowed pure 10 digit dialing for at least 10, though likely more like 15 years (when the plan simply included what used to be called long distance)
Since my very first one in 1996
My first was 1992, because of the reasons I mentioned above with the land lines and everything being long distance. Long distance on the cell in 1992 was so much cheaper than the land line cost per minute, that it paid for the cost of the cell phone!
Thanks for this ! Sorry for major necro-posting, but the recommendations in that article are pretty horrible (even as of the date of that article) - effectively: "With Windows, NTLM is easiest so just use that." That should be a non-starter.
This version 4 feels snappy, like you are running on a "real" computer.
But storage speed is more like an old harddrive compared to a modern server with SSD drives. To bad they didn't put a SATA or something on it.
Serving up some pages on apache or nginx is no problem. Ansible installs fine. Packages in Raspbian seems to be just about the entire Debian repository for whatever odd thing you want.
It's for sure the best Raspberry Pi so far. Can be used for a lot more things than the old version 3.
This would have happened on Server 2012 R2 as well, dual scan has been around and causes a lot of problems as you noted.
It is strange that I didn't have these issues in 2012 R2. I essentially copied the same GPO for 2012 R2 and made some minor changes to it to convert it for 2016. My 2012 R2 show the correct default service.
Weird, I have various Server 2016and now 2019 with WSUS and while dual scan was an issue for me on Server 2012/ 2012 R2 not anymore.
To add to this- I have an error that started appearing after updating their Fedora 29 and 30 instances. Further testing found that the error appears in different regions using their server type template installers or even a custom iso option that I used with net install. All I have to do is deploy, run dnf update and reboot. The error is present in every boot after the update. https://mangolassi.it/topic/19903/fedora-29-and-30-edac-skx-can-t-get-tolm-tohm-error-on-vultr
I don't think bridging will cause any problems in this case. Traffic is intermittent and low speed so even if there are more broadcast traffic sent over the VPN links, compared to a routing solution, I don't think it will have any impact.
But I'll probably set up some kind of test to make sure before deploying.
