I completely agree.. if you don't have DNS internal, use external.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@scottalanmiller said:

even at the desktop level.

That's really what it's designed for is technicians troubleshooting.

Yes, and I feel that it is excellent for that. And good as a launching point for most anything in IT.

@g.jacobse said:

How does Group Policy affect AD memberships or does it?

It does not. AD and GPO are separate things.

I had like 50 of these in my junk mail last week.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@Dashrender said:

I'm confused... So what you're telling me is, in a digital system (and possibly in my Mitel VOIP/SIP system too) that the call control isn't handed off to the phone, but is asterisk it is?

We used Mitel PBX and IP Phones at the town. Yes they call it a hold but it was basically a parking lot. Are there was a Individual Hold which placed it at the phone (could not remote pick up) or a System Hold which placed it on the PBX's parking lot hold. We just programed the buttons to do the system hold. It's different vendor terminology but it's the same thing.

So the parking lot # it put it at was always it's own extension? OK that would make total sense... the guys who set it up must have done that then...

KeepVid is what I use. No idea if it is good, though.

TP-Link switch is working excellent as well!

hmmm.. I'm not sure Appassure can talk directly to the storage medium.. I'd have to look into that.

@scottalanmiller ewww. Yuck.

@IRJ said:

@scottalanmiller said:

They don't even pretend to be trying to act on behalf of the country or with rationality anymore.

People don't even realize it, or are willing to give up freedom for a false sense of security

The nature of democracy. People don't think it through that much. The majority don't vote based on a knowledge or a care about the issues.

I guess I should have trusted my gut...

Oh well, I got my money back.

@scottalanmiller said:

@Dashrender said:

@coliver said:

@Dashrender said:

I only need one or two phones to be mobile throughout our buildings... so buying two WiFi phones will probably be easier than dealing with DECT base stations all over. In clinic, the phones will stay within 50 m of the base station, so that won't be a problem.

You could just download a VoIP app on your smart phone and connect it to Wifi... it would probably amount to the same thing... just less expensive. I assume you have a smart phone?

I enjoy Zoiper.

The problem with that is management and staff don't want to use personal equipment without compensating the equipment owner (staff member in this case). So currently BOYD doesn't work in my environment.

Poor Boyd. You should fire him.

LOL - nice.

$computers = Get-Content -path C:\fso\computers.txt
$user = "aUser"
$password = "MyNewPassword!"
Foreach($computer in $computers)
{
$user = [adsi]"WinNT://$computer/$user,user"
$user.SetPassword($Password)
$user.SetInfo()
}

http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2009/03/25/how-can-i-change-the-passwords-of-multiple-local-computer-accounts.aspx

@NetworkNerd said:

@Danp said:

So is freepbx a good choice for a voip novice? Also looking for opinions on hosted vs on-premise. Am I better to spin up a vm internally or host on DO?

Just be careful when you are talking about running something like FreePBX in-house on a VM versus with a hosting provider on a VM. There may be differences in the kernel that can cause buggy behavior in the PBX (like running Elastix on VMWare vs. Xen and call reports working in one case but not the other). It can work, but you want to test it to make sure.

But I'd say for a VOIP newb, FreePBX is a decent choice to dig in and start playing.

Awesome, I'm hoping that my consultant will point things like this out to me, as well as other pitfalls that might exist.

@Dashrender said:

It's a trust thing I guess. I hope that one managing a project like Elastix to do a pretty good or better job at securing their website, and I'd feel more comfortable pulling the hash from them than from a file sitting on the same file server as the actual file, especially since it's a hosting provider, not the content creator.

A better job than SourceForge? I'm not sure what you are looking for. SourceForge is a huge player and the source of the majority (I think) of the world's open source projects. At least those of any size. This is how a huge amount of open source is done.

SouceForge really is the content creator, in a way, here. Remember, this is open source.

To check:

netstat -tulpn

Tells you what is listening.

Other versions?

It does a ton. It's been the leader of Microsoft's extensive platform for over a decade. It's their application and integration platform.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/03/sourceforge_to_offer_only_optin_adware_after_gimp_grump/

Unmaintained adware, it therefore appears, can therefore be wrapped in more adware if SourceForge feels like it. But wrappers can only be applied to other projects if SourceForge asks the developers who all-but-abandoned it.

@Lakshmana said:

I can use putty to run the above path to restart the VNC session

Vino is not your VNC server. Why are you trying to run Vino?