@JaredBusch D'oh! I always forget about that part!

One of the problem with having forums "by technology" is the same issue with having groups - unlike tags it forced conversations under strict headings when strict headings don't exist. For example, is running SMB on Samba on Linux for Windows desktop use a Linux or Windows question? Or a storage question? Software or hardware? If you make a group or forum for each topic, you don't know where to post except for certain questions and those are pretty rare. We learned that lesson from SW, nothing is in an obvious group and the groups are completely useless. IT just doesn't work that way on any scale.

@scottalanmiller said:

We do a ton of VoIP hosting and consulting and find broadband to very rarely be an issue and when it is, it is normally super obvious that it is going to be an issue immediately (like it is flaky, oversaturated or whatever.) If the broadband is any good, it's almost always going to work well for VoIP. Not always, but very often.

Even for international calling!

Our PRI's are actually SIP Trunks that we use Cisco ISR routers to convert to PRIs for the older systems.. Though mostly we have SIP now.. Just a few stragglers.

@anthonyh said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@anthonyh said:

@scottalanmiller said:

I'm not clear what you are asking. Do you want a list of ALL files under said /directory or are you looking for only certain ones?

Every single file under /this/directory.

Oh okay.

find /dir -type f -print

Where /dir is the directory name in question. See if that gives you want you want.

That gives me the absolute path, but no date. I found this command that gets me a little closer:

find /this/directory -type f -exec stat -c "%n %y" {} ;

Gives me this:

/this/directory/data/EFile/DOC/227349_FS86478.pdf 2011-08-19 10:21:22.000000000 -0700

But it's not ideal, yet. I'd need to delimit the file and timestamp with something other than a space. I would love to eliminate the decimal on the seconds as well as the timezone, but I can work around those.

Easier to work with the date if you use UNIX time instead of a human readable format. And you can use the cut command to trim off anything trailing that you don't want.

Yeah, searching for NFS, not a VM was the first thing that came to my mind.

@scottalanmiller said:

I'd be shocked if they did anything other than that. Imagine everything that you worry that someone will do to you, that's likely what the cops are actively doing.

LOL you say that so matter of factly - like - well duh, of course they do this - we live in a police state, there is no right to privacy - The Bill of What?

LOL

And now to top it off, the vendor now has them in stock.

Hi guys, I already figured out my problem. Thanks to @Ambarishrh

The problem now is " We need to enable the TUN/TAP which can be done from side of VPS Provider.

@scottalanmiller said:

Ah, so it sounds like the firewall was just not blocking them before?

yep ..

I ran that with my domain admin account. If i use an account that is [email protected], I get the following (that account was used for a long time, and has the highest network credentials by far):

Additional Details

Exception details:
Message: Invalid Uri: parsing problem (no viable alternative): <
Parameter name: value
Type: System.ArgumentException
Stack trace:

Server stack trace:
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipUriParser..ctor(String value)
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.RealTimeAddress..ctor(String uri)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.TestOcsCore.DoMRASServiceRequest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.TestOcsCore.Initialize()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Lync.OcsSignInTest.PerformTestReally()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformTest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformChildren()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.Test.PerformTest()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Tests.TopLevelTest.PerformTest()
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Object[]& outArgs)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)

Exception rethrown at [0]:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.EndInvokeHelper(Message reqMsg, Boolean bProxyCase)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RemotingProxy.Invoke(Object NotUsed, MessageData& msgData)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.PerformTestAsyncDelegate.EndInvoke(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.TestExecutionManager.<>c__DisplayClass8.<TestCompleted>b__6()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Common.IL.ILUtil.DoTryFilterCatch(Action tryDelegate, Func2 filterDelegate, Action1 catchDelegate)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Tools.ExRca.Website.TestExecutionManager.TestCompleted(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
Exception details:
Message: Invalid Uri: parsing problem (no viable alternative): <
Type: Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.SipException
Stack trace:
at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.SipUri.ParseUriString()
at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipUriParser..ctor(String value)

LVM clearly dictates.....

@JaredBusch said:

@travisdh1 said:

@Dashrender said:

why can't you put it in the room where you are using it?

1 AP and 8 rooms, and adding more APs would most likely create to much overlap. I actually have 2 on the way, but only anticipate needing one in that building. The 2nd one will be in a different building, and much simpler to deal with.

If you have lots of walls, then put two on opposite ends of the building and set the power to low.

This is why we test! While I think one will be enough, I ordered 2. The location for the 2nd one can easily be covered by the current cheapo running DD-WRT. I have a Friday of a long network cord on the floor while I walk around starring at WiFiAnalyzer on the company tablet.

You should point out that XenServer is almost exclusively for quite small companies, not large ones. XenServer goes after the SMB market primarily. It is Xen without XenServer that tends to go after the big enterprise customers. Both play in both markets, but XS really is focused on SMB and Xen sans XS on the enormous cloud market.

But as such, those big clouds are used by nearly every up to date SMB. So almost everyone is running something on Xen even if they do not realize it. Xen is just about everywhere.

@Dashrender said:

Do you think this will lead to an even higher infection rate than before?

Yes, because it now does not even take any coding knowledge. The crypto is created for you. All the person now has to do is find a delivery mechanism.

@Mike-Davis said:

femtocell

If you are trying to provide coverage for the customers, and only have one device - you risk 'losing' those customers since one carrier gets preferential treatment.

@anonymous said:

@Mike-Davis Your confusing two different services both offered by Backblaze.

Backblaze Business is a backup service like CrashPlan Business. $50 year for unlimited data, but it's designed for workstations not servers. This service is NOT in beta.

The service I was discussing was their B2 Cloud Storage service which is like Amazon S3. It just raw storage, you need something like the Cloudberry software to do the backup, and B2 would storage the data.

Does this make since?

P.S. I didn't realize B2 Cloud Storage was still in beta, would be better to hold off using it in production for now.

I thought in the other thread they had said it was out of Beta now.

@JaredBusch said:

@Dashrender said:

@JaredBusch said:

@Dashrender said:

@PSX_Defector said:

@JaredBusch said:

@NetworkNerd said:

They did provide specifics. They said open UDP 1024 - 65535 for RTP traffic specifically but UDP 5060 for SIP.

No, stating 1024-65535 is NOT specifics. It is a cop out.

At that point, why not just completely make it unsecured and put in an any/any rule.

I would silo that shit pronto, so when the inevitable pwnage happens it doesn't infect the rest of the network.

If it's limited only to the IP of the SIP provider, what are you worried about? Don't get me wrong, we should of course limit the ports when possible, but really 1 port versus 64K ports - does it make you more vulnerable when you've locked the ports to a single incoming IP?

My response to that is how can I trust them to keep their stuff secure when they cannot even configure a proper set of ports for RTP?

You have a completely valid point.

Setting that aside - does the rest of my point remain valid?

Yes, as long as you have properly restricted it to the provider, you have less to worry about.

I've restricted SIP and RTP traffic to the Intelepeer ips as @Dashrender mentions.

This is the important bit

function getSiteStatus (url) { var siteStatus = -1; try { var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(url, { muteHttpExceptions: true, validateHttpsCertificates: false, followRedirects: true }); siteStatus = response.getResponseCode() === 200 ? 200 : -1; } catch(e) {} return siteStatus; }

So upon further investigation I've realized I'm a complete moron. So I created the local storage through the web interface. I thought that meant it was local to XenServer, but it was local to XO. So the backups are being saved to the container and not on XenServer. Disregard everything above, I'm just stupid.

@johnhooks said:

Ya I've tried to install with the gui and it wouldn't run unless I had it at least 1 GB. After the install I just put it at 256MB

This is what I should have done.....

or This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eplStIEmtlA