So Windows 11??
-
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
-
@pete-s said in So Windows 11??:
@stuartjordan said in So Windows 11??:
What are your thoughts? at least they got rid of the tiles, can't stand them in Win10.
They are saying updates are going to be 40% lighter, We will see about that and they are going to allow win32 exe apps inside the store with android. Be interesting to see if they have moved more of the control panel items.WHAT? Windows 10 was their last Windows they said. They also said that artificial sweeteners were safe, WMDs were in Iraq and Anna Nicole Smith married for love.
It was and still is. You see because Windows 10 isn't a VERSION, it's a NAME. Windows 11 is either Windows 10 renamed or it is a version OF Windows 10. In either case, Windows 10 is the last "version" of Windows because it is the name of Windows, not a version of it.
-
@stuartjordan said in So Windows 11??:
@black3dynamite I actually have a windows licence on this machine, but moved over to linux because I'm more productive on it. I can leave it on without it forcing me to reboot or waiting forever for updates to install. I dsilike the start menu in windows 10 and half settings in control panel and other half in settings. even changing the network adapter is more clicks then it was in windows 7. the days of just right clicking and going to properties, and I dont see Ctrl + Run netcpl.cpl as productive. Linux just does updates better. both the first and 2nd feature updates killed my machine. and now bringing back widgets...fuck that's not innovation.
Same, all my machines come with Windows and I just put Linux over the top of it.
-
@black3dynamite said in So Windows 11??:
@stuartjordan said in So Windows 11??:
I'm not sure if it would move me back to windows from Linux. Only time will tell..
Besides paying you to use Windows, what made you move from Microsoft to Linux?
Everything
It's slow, it's buggy, updates are a train wreck, security, easy of use, aesthetics, support, flexibility, software, software management, shell quality, etc. -
@scottalanmiller said in So Windows 11??:
@black3dynamite said in So Windows 11??:
@stuartjordan said in So Windows 11??:
I'm not sure if it would move me back to windows from Linux. Only time will tell..
Besides paying you to use Windows, what made you move from Microsoft to Linux?
Everything
It's slow, it's buggy, updates are a train wreck, security, easy of use, aesthetics, support, flexibility, software, software management, shell quality, etc.Spot on, couldn't of said it any better and it's bloaty as well.
As Dustin was saying above I cannot believe you need to have a Microsoft account now for signing on. with even more tracking embedded wouldn't surprise me.How much has our work flow changed from using pc/laptop since the xp/win7 era? The only reason they wanted to change the OS so badly was to support the mobile and tablet market. But most people didn't want that and their mobile effort failed. They shouldn't of touched the desktop as much. They finally got somewhere with Windows 7, such a shame.There is nothing inovating about what the new Windows will be like that linux distros haven't already done.
-
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
You are not from what I saw. It is just not easy to get around.
-
Windows 11 Home will require a Microsoft account. Confirming what I saw last week when I installed both Windows 11 Home and Windows 11 Pro in clean install and upgrade configurations, Windows 11 will controversially require both an Internet connection and a Microsoft account (MSA) during the initial Setup. This is a curiously tone-deaf decision, given that Home is the mainstream Windows 11 version and Microsoft’s history with this kind of thing. (Anyone else remember the “submarine” episode ahead of the Xbox One launch?)
https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/252299/microsoft-unveils-windows-11
-
/Sarcasm I'm sure the next change Microsoft will implement is that Windows Pro and up will be required to be domain joined to an Azure tenant...
-
@jaredbusch said in So Windows 11??:
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
You are not from what I saw. It is just not easy to get around.
Not that easy currently, either.
-
@voip_n00b said in So Windows 11??:
Windows 11 Home will require a Microsoft account. Confirming what I saw last week when I installed both Windows 11 Home and Windows 11 Pro in clean install and upgrade configurations, Windows 11 will controversially require both an Internet connection and a Microsoft account (MSA) during the initial Setup. This is a curiously tone-deaf decision, given that Home is the mainstream Windows 11 version and Microsoft’s history with this kind of thing. (Anyone else remember the “submarine” episode ahead of the Xbox One launch?)
https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-11/252299/microsoft-unveils-windows-11
It feels unlikely that microsoft will make their computers "online only." Tin foil hat wearing anti-Internet types are a major customer group of Windows.
-
@scottalanmiller said in So Windows 11??:
@jaredbusch said in So Windows 11??:
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
You are not from what I saw. It is just not easy to get around.
Not that easy currently, either.
actually, I read that you just have to Alt F4 the window requesting a MS logon, and it will press on.
-
@dashrender said in So Windows 11??:
@scottalanmiller said in So Windows 11??:
@jaredbusch said in So Windows 11??:
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
You are not from what I saw. It is just not easy to get around.
Not that easy currently, either.
actually, I read that you just have to Alt F4 the window requesting a MS logon, and it will press on.
Will have to test that!
-
@scottalanmiller said in So Windows 11??:
@dashrender said in So Windows 11??:
@scottalanmiller said in So Windows 11??:
@jaredbusch said in So Windows 11??:
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
You are not from what I saw. It is just not easy to get around.
Not that easy currently, either.
actually, I read that you just have to Alt F4 the window requesting a MS logon, and it will press on.
Will have to test that!
Yeah on each variant of the OS, home pro etc
-
I saw that only 8 gen or newer Intel CPUs are supported. So for instance 6th generation (Skylake) is not supported.
Microsoft of course knows they will sell more OS as more people will need to get new computers.
-
@dustinb3403 said in So Windows 11??:
The fact that you're required to have a Microsoft account for the new OS is disturbing.
Only for non-pro version.
-
@dashrender said in So Windows 11??:
actually, I read that you just have to Alt F4 the window requesting a MS logon, and it will press on.
Also, with the current Home versions, if you wait until after the username setup to attached to WiFi or plug into ethernet, it lets you create a local account.
-
Not impressed. Have to replace my CPU (Ryzen 5 1600) if I want to upgrade.
Yeah yeah, TPM blah blah blah. Still not happy about it. I've only had the CPU for 3 years.Granted I don't have to move until 2025 (WIN10 EOL) if I want to retain my hardware that long.
Just irritated that I can't upgrade straight away.These requirements may not seem too strict, but having a look at the list of supported processors, you’ll notice that the 1st Gen AMD Ryzen CPUs aren’t supported, and the 2nd Gen Zen+ processors are a bare minimum on AMD’s end and the 8th Gen Kaby Lake-R is the least supported on Intel’s end. Keep in mind that although the OS will run on systems using older processors, it’s “not recommended”. Microsoft’s list of supported processors doesn’t make sense as there’s little to no difference between the 1st and 2nd Gen Ryzen processors. Similarly, the Kaby Lake-R (8th Gen Intel Core lineup) is essentially a rebranding of the 7th Gen offerings.
- BBQ Sauce: https://www.hardwaretimes.com/windows-11-wont-support-1st-gen-amd-ryzen-processors-tpm-required/
More Dipping Sauces
-
@nadnerb said in So Windows 11??:
Not impressed. Have to replace my CPU (Ryzen 5 1600) if I want to upgrade.
Yeah yeah, TPM blah blah blah. Still not happy about it. I've only had the CPU for 3 years.Granted I don't have to move until 2025 (WIN10 EOL) if I want to retain my hardware that long.
Just irritated that I can't upgrade straight away.These requirements may not seem too strict, but having a look at the list of supported processors, you’ll notice that the 1st Gen AMD Ryzen CPUs aren’t supported, and the 2nd Gen Zen+ processors are a bare minimum on AMD’s end and the 8th Gen Kaby Lake-R is the least supported on Intel’s end. Keep in mind that although the OS will run on systems using older processors, it’s “not recommended”. Microsoft’s list of supported processors doesn’t make sense as there’s little to no difference between the 1st and 2nd Gen Ryzen processors. Similarly, the Kaby Lake-R (8th Gen Intel Core lineup) is essentially a rebranding of the 7th Gen offerings.
- BBQ Sauce: https://www.hardwaretimes.com/windows-11-wont-support-1st-gen-amd-ryzen-processors-tpm-required/
More Dipping Sauces
It's called planned obsolescence. It's not done for any technical reason whatsoever, so looking for what makes "sense" doesn't make sense.
-
Companies need to make money… not that windows didn’t make money before, but the old method of a one time sale is pretty much gone… most have moved to a subscription model.
Part of me says that ms should just straight up move to that model for windows. You’re on a current system, then something like $20/yr, as it gets older ramp the price up because support becomes more Expensive even if only for updates because you have to leave devs back on the older platforms instead of move if their work to the modern current one of the day.
Of course, if that happens, I think the jump nix bases OSes would skyrocket for home use.
But maybe not… maybe more people would go Mac or chromeOS
-
@dashrender said in So Windows 11??:
Companies need to make money… not that windows didn’t make money before, but the old method of a one time sale is pretty much gone… most have moved to a subscription model.
Part of me says that ms should just straight up move to that model for windows. You’re on a current system, then something like $20/yr, as it gets older ramp the price up because support becomes more Expensive even if only for updates because you have to leave devs back on the older platforms instead of move if their work to the modern current one of the day.
Of course, if that happens, I think the jump nix bases OSes would skyrocket for home use.
But maybe not… maybe more people would go Mac or chromeOS
People are very used to subscriptions so I think almost no one would switch. But I don't think Microsoft is doing that.
I think they are going the Facebook route. The service (Windows OS) will be "free" for the consumer but they will be the product.
They will bring in money from their cloud services and do their old classic integration in Windows that will disfavor the competition. Like they have done with many, many services. Pretending them to be essential to the OS. Like Internet Explorer.
