What Are You Watching Now
-
Stargate: Origins costs $20
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/21/unlimited-stargate-streaming-will-cost-20/
-
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Watching Now:
Stargate: Origins costs $20
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/21/unlimited-stargate-streaming-will-cost-20/
I like Stargate but not enough for $20. Why not include the rest of MGM movies?
-
@black3dynamite said in What Are You Watching Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Watching Now:
Stargate: Origins costs $20
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/21/unlimited-stargate-streaming-will-cost-20/
I like Stargate but not enough for $20. Why not include the rest of MGM movies?
It is a one time cost. I think it is worth it. I will get HQ streams of all the SG shows and movies.
-
OK for access to all the Stargate stuff- definitely worth $20.
I wonder what quality the show is in? HD or less?
-
SciShow Kids with Luciana.
-
Time to binge watch season three of Fuller House.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Watching Now:
Time to binge watch season three of Fuller House.
My family is watching it too.
-
@black3dynamite said in What Are You Watching Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Watching Now:
Time to binge watch season three of Fuller House.
My family is watching it too.
The Japanese routine was pretty funny.
-
American Psycho - The Musical - Full Show
Youtube Video -
Season four of Cheers
-
The Orville -- Best feature thus far is that it puts me right to sleep.
-
Watched the first two episodes of Star Trek Discovery. Have not made up my mind yet. The only thing I don't like is how the damn Klingons look. They should look like they did in TOS. This is set before Kirk and after Capt. Archer in Enterprise, they are in that universe, not the JJ Abrams universe. In Enterprise they explained what happened to the ridges of the Klingons. Also, the Klingons don't even look like Klingons from TOS, STTNG, DS9, Voyager, or Enterprise. FFS how hard is it to have a little continuity.
-
Just read that the redesign was pretty much because Klingons look had changed in the other series they thought they had creative license to do it in this one. Which to me is pretty much saying because we wanted to do it. Screw the stories from the other franchises we are better. Which does not sit well with me.
-
This post is deleted! -
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Watching Now:
Watched the first two episodes of Star Trek Discovery. Have not made up my mind yet. The only thing I don't like is how the damn Klingons look. They should look like they did in TOS. This is set before Kirk and after Capt. Archer in Enterprise, they are in that universe, not the JJ Abrams universe. In Enterprise they explained what happened to the ridges of the Klingons. Also, the Klingons don't even look like Klingons from TOS, STTNG, DS9, Voyager, or Enterprise. FFS how hard is it to have a little continuity.
If it took place 5-10 years before Kirk, I suppose ridgeless might have been the best option, but the ridged version of Klingons still existed in the Empire. Just oddly somehow humans completely forgot (history wise) that Klingons had ridges, etc... and instead where the pansies that existed in Kirk's time
I haven't seen the show yet, but it sounds like Paramount made them look like JJ's Klingons - which is sad, because they look even worse than Kirk's Klingons in my opinion.
-
@dashrender exactly it took place 5-10 years before Kirk. In the Star Trek Enterprise series in Season 4 episode 15 "Affliction", it explained the Klingons were experimenting with the DNA of the Human Augments (Khan and his people the genetically altered humans) and spliced it into Klingon DNA. However, the experiments end up creating a deadly virus and the cure for the virus is incubated in Capt. Archer; the virus ends up dissolving the cranial ridges which would last for several generations. Thus carrying it through Star Trek Discovery and into Kirk's time. Thus these Klingons are only looking they way they are because the knuckleheads in charge wanted them to look different. The only excuse they gave is, well they redesigned Klingons before so why not now too.
-
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Watching Now:
@dashrender exactly it took place 5-10 years before Kirk. In the Star Trek Enterprise series in Season 4 episode 15 "Affliction", it explained the Klingons were experimenting with the DNA of the Human Augments (Khan and his people the genetically altered humans) and spliced it into Klingon DNA. However, the experiments end up creating a deadly virus and the cure for the virus is incubated in Capt. Archer; the virus ends up dissolving the cranial ridges which would last for several generations. Thus carrying it through Star Trek Discovery and into Kirk's time. Thus these Klingons are only looking they way they are because the knuckleheads in charge wanted them to look different. The only excuse they gave is, well they redesigned Klingons before so why not now too.
Sure, I get all that (as for the Enterprise timeline - nice save by the way for them.. lol), but it didn't effect 100% of Kingons, only those that were experimented on, or so I thought.
It just so happens I'm almost to that episode in my current binge watching.
-
The redesign was absolutely stupid because there is no reason. They just wanted to. That have publicly stated as much.
-
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Watching Now:
The redesign was absolutely stupid because there is no reason. They just wanted to. That have publicly stated as much.
Then I hope they get rioted and mobbed by a bunch of ST:TNG Cosplay Klingons in full battle gear with their bat'leths.
chaq curl 'ej painfully unusable ghop. -
Watched a little over half of the first season of Ozark on Netflix. Really good so far, plus I like Jason Bateman and it's fun to try and spot locations that I recognize since it was filmed at the 2 large Corps of Engineers lakes near Atlanta.
