yes working properly without any issue

If this is CentOS you need to either turn off SELinux (probably best here) or reset the permissions again.

That or we jumped the gun and interrupted it while it was doing its thing.

@dafyre said:

@Reid-Cooper said:

I'm pretty sure that Apple will sell you whatever you want to buy.

At extortionist pricing...

There is only one price. I don't think that Apple does any extra markup on the drives after the fact. They are the same price up front or later. So no extortion pricing, it's all level pricing. That's one of the Apple advantages. Sure, you have a higher price starting point, but you get all price transparency and the majority of the price pain up front. There are no surprises and later price jacks once people are locked in, even though they are locked in.

OK.

I was about to post a request. Has anyone prepared for ISO 27001:2005 audit? I've been asked to do an internal check to do a Gap assessment

That won't change your running shell. But now you can use the traditional ulimit command to alter the running shell....

ulimit -n 2048

Voila, that worked.

ulimit -n 2048

@thecreativeone91 said:

Pfsense doesn't do well performance wise virtalized. At least it didn't used to. I think they have a pay for version optimized for VM platforms.

It's just FreeBSD plus drivers, right? It should do as well as FreeBSD does on whatever platform is in question. That FreeBSD doesn't have PV support for Xen is a major drawback to FreeBSD as a platform in general. But it should only be a question of drivers, in general.

http://mangolassi.it/topic/6143/linux-lab-project-building-a-linux-jump-box/

@tonyshowoff said:

@Dashrender said:

Kind of on a rant today, aren't you @tonyshowoff ?

Not really, my wife said she was tired of hearing me complain about things on the Internet, so now I'm just typing what I used to sit here and say outloud, shouting across the room.

LOL - I know that feeling...

I loved SunOS, Solaris, and OpenSolaris, but after the Oracle buyout all of the Sun equipment has been slowly replaced and has gone away for the most part, and with the important features being ported to other OSes like FreeBSD, there's not much of a real reason to use OpenSolaris or its babies. Having said that though, I'm put off by the name OpenIndiana, it just sounds really stupid to me, and I don't think I could ever install something like that without flat out denying it if anyone asked. It just makes me think "that's the best name you could come up with, huh? Not even anything remotely related to the Sun or stars or anything..." (I realise the origin comes from a project name, but sticking with it was a mistake, so in a sense I guess I should say "So, couldn't come up with anything at all?")

@Lakshmana said:

@Reid-Cooper OK I have disabled my firewall and gave only the IP address for the system to be in remote

This makes no sense...enable the firewall and allow port 5900 in IPTables.

@John-Nicholson has a lot of info about the red headed stepchild that is SFU.

I'll definitely be upgrading to this new version and checking it out before I try a different flavour of Linux on it though