What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Nextcloud:
There are some warnings regarding your setup. The "Strict-Transport-Security" HTTP header is not set to at least "15552000" seconds. For enhanced security, it is recommended to enable HSTS as described in the security tips ↗.
If you're using nginx externally as a reverse proxy you need to add
add_header Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000;
to your server block to resolve thisNote: Hm. This actually isn't working. The example Nextcloud uses is a virtual host
-
@wirestyle22 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Nextcloud:
There are some warnings regarding your setup. The "Strict-Transport-Security" HTTP header is not set to at least "15552000" seconds. For enhanced security, it is recommended to enable HSTS as described in the security tips ↗.
If you're using nginx externally as a reverse proxy you need to add
add_header Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000;
to your server block to resolve thisNote: Hm. This actually isn't working. The example Nextcloud uses is a virtual host
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains; preload";
-
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
-
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
It's crazy. I had thought this whole time that things like accessing file services required CALs, but not just random guest devices that get a DHCP address. That totally changes everything. One scenario I read that claimed to need a CAL was a networked break buzzer for the shop floor. If using the per user model, you would need a user CAL for each employee on payroll. Dumb
-
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now.. -
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
It's crazy. I had thought this whole time that things like accessing file services required CALs, but not just random guest devices that get a DHCP address. That totally changes everything. One scenario I read that claimed to need a CAL was a networked break buzzer for the shop floor. If using the per user model, you would need a user CAL for each employee on payroll. Dumb
Yeah. Just adding in DHCP means lots more CALs for something that is free almost anywhere else.
-
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..That easy..
Windows.
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..That easy..
Windows.
well... You're not wrong.. .
-
Where do I start with replacing the whole AD/DHCP/DNS stack for managing windows machines? I'm locked in to windows desktop OS for the foreseeable future, but I dont need to be dependent on them for everything else. I can see the next generation of services not using windows server in anyway, with SQL being able to be run from linux or windows 10, and something like Nextcloud running the file server.
-
This post is deleted! -
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..Freed up 349+ MB
-
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..Freed up 349+ MB
Wiztree
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..Freed up 349+ MB
Wiztree
I'll give it a shot
-
@JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@WrCombs said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Trying to figure out how this site has a 465gb Hard Drive ( set up with FakeRAID with 2 drives)
Used up leaving only 168 MB left of Free space. .. .
Running Disk Cleanup right now..Freed up 349+ MB
Wiztree
Best piece of software for this.
-
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
It's crazy. I had thought this whole time that things like accessing file services required CALs, but not just random guest devices that get a DHCP address. That totally changes everything. One scenario I read that claimed to need a CAL was a networked break buzzer for the shop floor. If using the per user model, you would need a user CAL for each employee on payroll. Dumb
Most places find that per user is the much cheaper way to go. Only in shops where you have huge staff but few shared computers does device license make sense. So in the case of phone connecting - it would be covered under the user's user license.
-
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Where do I start with replacing the whole AD/DHCP/DNS stack for managing windows machines? I'm locked in to windows desktop OS for the foreseeable future, but I dont need to be dependent on them for everything else. I can see the next generation of services not using windows server in anyway, with SQL being able to be run from linux or windows 10, and something like Nextcloud running the file server.
Windows 10 suffers the max 10 connections issue - just reminding you of that.
-
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
It's crazy. I had thought this whole time that things like accessing file services required CALs, but not just random guest devices that get a DHCP address. That totally changes everything. One scenario I read that claimed to need a CAL was a networked break buzzer for the shop floor. If using the per user model, you would need a user CAL for each employee on payroll. Dumb
Most places find that per user is the much cheaper way to go. Only in shops where you have huge staff but few shared computers does device license make sense. So in the case of phone connecting - it would be covered under the user's user license.
we have about 50 computer users but 200 shop employees. I dont currently have any CALs that cover the shop employees.
-
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Where do I start with replacing the whole AD/DHCP/DNS stack for managing windows machines? I'm locked in to windows desktop OS for the foreseeable future, but I dont need to be dependent on them for everything else. I can see the next generation of services not using windows server in anyway, with SQL being able to be run from linux or windows 10, and something like Nextcloud running the file server.
Windows 10 suffers the max 10 connections issue - just reminding you of that.
can you elaborate?
-
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@DustinB3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@Donahue said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
I'm reading up on MS CALs. I just realized that you even need a CAL for things like DHCP or DNS.
Yeah, which is why MS licensing (bad player) fees get to be extreme a lot of the time.
It's crazy. I had thought this whole time that things like accessing file services required CALs, but not just random guest devices that get a DHCP address. That totally changes everything. One scenario I read that claimed to need a CAL was a networked break buzzer for the shop floor. If using the per user model, you would need a user CAL for each employee on payroll. Dumb
Most places find that per user is the much cheaper way to go. Only in shops where you have huge staff but few shared computers does device license make sense. So in the case of phone connecting - it would be covered under the user's user license.
we have about 50 computer users but 200 shop employees. I dont currently have any CALs that cover the shop employees.
Device Cal's would be what you want.