ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    ServerBear Performance Comparison of Rackspace, Digital Ocean, Linode and Vultr

    IT Discussion
    serverbear server benchmarking rackspace iaas vps digital ocean vultr centos centos 7 linux linux server kvm xen
    12
    56
    17.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wirestyle22W
      wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @wirestyle22 said:

      Wow. That's fantastic.

      I'm so excited. No question that they are by FAR the hardest to use, but who cares. That performance is crazy!!

      Rewarded complexity is fine by me 😄

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Throughout the range, Linode comes in either as cheap or cheaper than everyone else, too. It pretty much tracks Vultr until it outscales them. Then it matches or beats DO.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Of additional consideration... Vultr and RS cap out pretty small. DO and Linode make massive single nodes, which is important when we are running epic databases, which we are doing. The growth rate on the database is quite healthy.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • A
            Alex Sage
            last edited by Alex Sage

            http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/04/linode_back_at_last_after_ten_days_of_hell/

            travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • travisdh1T
              travisdh1 @Alex Sage
              last edited by travisdh1

              @aaronstuder said:

              http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/04/linode_back_at_last_after_ten_days_of_hell/

              That's just painful, but have to expect that to happen now and then. Guess I'll start an overnight ping test, see how bad it still is.

              Edit: Never mind, don't have the IP address for the Linode.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                Here is the blog response to that...

                https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                  last edited by

                  @travisdh1 said:

                  Edit: Never mind, don't have the IP address for the Linode.

                  It's already offline but I will get you a new one privately in a few minutes.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A
                    Alex Sage
                    last edited by Alex Sage

                    Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?

                    DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403 @Alex Sage
                      last edited by

                      @aaronstuder said:

                      Will Mongolassi be moving to Linode?

                      Nope Mongolassi doesn't exist!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                        last edited by

                        @aaronstuder said:

                        Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?

                        Yes, going to make an attempt of it.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wrx7mW
                          wrx7m @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          Here is the blog response to that...

                          https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                          This was really interesting.

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @wrx7m
                            last edited by

                            @wrx7m said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            Here is the blog response to that...

                            https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                            This was really interesting.

                            Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender said:

                              @wrx7m said:

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              Here is the blog response to that...

                              https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                              This was really interesting.

                              Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

                              Yeah, the scale here is crazy.

                              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                @Dashrender said:

                                @wrx7m said:

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                Here is the blog response to that...

                                https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                                This was really interesting.

                                Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

                                Yeah, the scale here is crazy.

                                80 GB attack - damn!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch
                                  last edited by JaredBusch

                                  @scottalanmiller I got busy and never got back to this.

                                  I just cancelled the pings. here are the results.

                                  64 bytes from 172.99.75.133: icmp_seq=34832 ttl=50 time=39.6 ms
                                  ^C
                                  --- 172.99.75.133 ping statistics ---
                                  34832 packets transmitted, 20406 received, 41% packet loss, time 34860502ms
                                  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.082/39.183/122.033/2.152 ms
                                  [root@keygen ~]#
                                  
                                  64 bytes from 108.61.151.173: icmp_seq=34830 ttl=54 time=49.9 ms
                                  ^C
                                  --- 108.61.151.173 ping statistics ---
                                  34830 packets transmitted, 34821 received, 0% packet loss, time 34873888ms
                                  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.852/47.901/842.335/7.692 ms
                                  [root@keygen ~]#
                                  
                                  64 bytes from 104.236.119.59: icmp_seq=34838 ttl=56 time=48.6 ms
                                  ^C
                                  --- 104.236.119.59 ping statistics ---
                                  34838 packets transmitted, 34807 received, 0% packet loss, time 34890326ms
                                  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.341/48.750/1051.915/5.427 ms, pipe 2
                                  [root@keygen ~]#
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • A
                                    Alex Sage
                                    last edited by

                                    BOM!

                                    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/18/1ZurVXGpWEB3IxoA

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                      last edited by

                                      @aaronstuder that would be the Atom processor. Per thread performance is low. You get a lot of memory with that but not much CPU. Great for a lab. Much slower thread performance on physical than the VMs we are testing.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by Alex Sage

                                        @scottalanmiller

                                        Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6

                                        Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4

                                        The C2750 is 85% more energy efficient than the Intel Xeon E5-2680 CPU.

                                        In a data center with thousands of servers, that adds up quickly 🙂

                                        http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/900/Intel_Atom_C2750_vs_Intel_Xeon_E5-2680.html

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • larsen161L
                                          larsen161
                                          last edited by

                                          have you looked at something like packet.net

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                            last edited by

                                            @aaronstuder said:

                                            @scottalanmiller

                                            Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6

                                            Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4

                                            You are comparing two cores to a full eight on a dedicated CPU. That the Linode is greater than 1/4 the bogomips when virtualized shows the difference.

                                            And while yes, energy efficiency is important, so is largest scalable size and thread performance. Atoms are decent for certain workloads, but you need more of them to do it. But workloads for which Atoms are good, ARMs are better. So Atom often falls into a weird middle ground of "mostly only well suited for something that they are not ideal for."

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post