ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    ServerBear Performance Comparison of Rackspace, Digital Ocean, Linode and Vultr

    IT Discussion
    serverbear server benchmarking rackspace iaas vps digital ocean vultr centos centos 7 linux linux server kvm xen
    12
    56
    17.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Alex Sage
      last edited by Alex Sage

      Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?

      DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @Alex Sage
        last edited by

        @aaronstuder said:

        Will Mongolassi be moving to Linode?

        Nope Mongolassi doesn't exist!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
          last edited by

          @aaronstuder said:

          Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?

          Yes, going to make an attempt of it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wrx7mW
            wrx7m @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            Here is the blog response to that...

            https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

            This was really interesting.

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @wrx7m
              last edited by

              @wrx7m said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Here is the blog response to that...

              https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

              This was really interesting.

              Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                @wrx7m said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                Here is the blog response to that...

                https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                This was really interesting.

                Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

                Yeah, the scale here is crazy.

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @wrx7m said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  Here is the blog response to that...

                  https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/

                  This was really interesting.

                  Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.

                  Yeah, the scale here is crazy.

                  80 GB attack - damn!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch
                    last edited by JaredBusch

                    @scottalanmiller I got busy and never got back to this.

                    I just cancelled the pings. here are the results.

                    64 bytes from 172.99.75.133: icmp_seq=34832 ttl=50 time=39.6 ms
                    ^C
                    --- 172.99.75.133 ping statistics ---
                    34832 packets transmitted, 20406 received, 41% packet loss, time 34860502ms
                    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.082/39.183/122.033/2.152 ms
                    [root@keygen ~]#
                    
                    64 bytes from 108.61.151.173: icmp_seq=34830 ttl=54 time=49.9 ms
                    ^C
                    --- 108.61.151.173 ping statistics ---
                    34830 packets transmitted, 34821 received, 0% packet loss, time 34873888ms
                    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.852/47.901/842.335/7.692 ms
                    [root@keygen ~]#
                    
                    64 bytes from 104.236.119.59: icmp_seq=34838 ttl=56 time=48.6 ms
                    ^C
                    --- 104.236.119.59 ping statistics ---
                    34838 packets transmitted, 34807 received, 0% packet loss, time 34890326ms
                    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.341/48.750/1051.915/5.427 ms, pipe 2
                    [root@keygen ~]#
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • A
                      Alex Sage
                      last edited by

                      BOM!

                      http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/18/1ZurVXGpWEB3IxoA

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                        last edited by

                        @aaronstuder that would be the Atom processor. Per thread performance is low. You get a lot of memory with that but not much CPU. Great for a lab. Much slower thread performance on physical than the VMs we are testing.

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by Alex Sage

                          @scottalanmiller

                          Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6

                          Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4

                          The C2750 is 85% more energy efficient than the Intel Xeon E5-2680 CPU.

                          In a data center with thousands of servers, that adds up quickly 🙂

                          http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/900/Intel_Atom_C2750_vs_Intel_Xeon_E5-2680.html

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • larsen161L
                            larsen161
                            last edited by

                            have you looked at something like packet.net

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                              last edited by

                              @aaronstuder said:

                              @scottalanmiller

                              Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6

                              Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4

                              You are comparing two cores to a full eight on a dedicated CPU. That the Linode is greater than 1/4 the bogomips when virtualized shows the difference.

                              And while yes, energy efficiency is important, so is largest scalable size and thread performance. Atoms are decent for certain workloads, but you need more of them to do it. But workloads for which Atoms are good, ARMs are better. So Atom often falls into a weird middle ground of "mostly only well suited for something that they are not ideal for."

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @larsen161
                                last edited by

                                @larsen161 said:

                                have you looked at something like packet.net

                                Decent looking product, but no RAID on their entry level. Really meant for DevOps only.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller They have RAID.....

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                    last edited by

                                    @aaronstuder said:

                                    @scottalanmiller They have RAID.....

                                    Not according to their price list. Only more expensive options begin to offer RAID.

                                    dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • dafyreD
                                      dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      @aaronstuder said:

                                      @scottalanmiller They have RAID.....

                                      Not according to their price list. Only more expensive options begin to offer RAID.

                                      They are super pricey too... $300 a month, almost. Granted, that's their Type 1 system... I get half the CPU & RAM, but almost 10 x the storage for $25 a month through KimSufi.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • A
                                        Alex Sage @dafyre
                                        last edited by

                                        @dafyre said:

                                        I get half the CPU & RAM, but almost 10 x the storage for $25 a month through KimSufi.

                                        Your still using that? How do you like it?

                                        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @Alex Sage
                                          last edited by

                                          @aaronstuder said:

                                          @dafyre said:

                                          I get half the CPU & RAM, but almost 10 x the storage for $25 a month through KimSufi.

                                          Your still using that? How do you like it?

                                          It's pretty good! I tried running XS on it, but XS simply does not like having one public IP and NATing VMs behind it... So I'm running KVM on it now. It's great!

                                          I use Duplicity to backup my VMs and then ship the backups off to my Amazon Cloud Drive. I do not think their systems have RAID, but I get 16GB RAM, a 4 Core CPU (I forget which one) and 2TB of Spinning Rust. Bandwidth is excellent too.

                                          I don't have any major workloads on it... Just a Chat server for my pops and about 10 people, a testing web server, and my ownCloud server with ~3 users.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • A
                                            Alex Sage
                                            last edited by

                                            @dafyre Can you explain how to do it with KVM?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 3 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post