Random Thread - Anything Goes
-
-
-
@coliver said:
Haha... oh man reporting just isn't the same now a days.
Was there ever a time that Americans knew the difference between Austria and Australia?
-
I can only imagine that the world wars were insanely confusing to Americans who were simultaneously allies with and bitterly at war with Australia/Austria. What is a war like to people who can't identify other countries?
-
-
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
-
@nadnerB said:
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
All American news is owned by two or three corporations. For some reason they are all in a race to the lowest common denominator of viewership.
-
Just ordered some new bits for my Pi - currently got a 2 that's not been used much, so once I get it all up-to-date etc I'll prob get a 3 too...
-
@coliver said:
@nadnerB said:
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
All American news is owned by two or three corporations. For some reason they are all in a race to the lowest common denominator of viewership.
Is it bad that I trust my local papers more than the syndicated stuff we find on TV?
-
@dafyre said:
@coliver said:
@nadnerB said:
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
All American news is owned by two or three corporations. For some reason they are all in a race to the lowest common denominator of viewership.
Is it bad that I trust my local papers more than the syndicated stuff we find on TV?
Only if that means that you trust any of them.
-
@dafyre said:
@coliver said:
@nadnerB said:
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
All American news is owned by two or three corporations. For some reason they are all in a race to the lowest common denominator of viewership.
Is it bad that I trust my local papers more than the syndicated stuff we find on TV?
Our local paper is pretty decent at reporting events, not sure I would trust them beyond that.
-
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@coliver said:
@nadnerB said:
@mlnews said:
American news...
Is that where it's from? I saw ^ in passing earlier and was a tad confused. I would have expected that from Fox as I was under the impression that CNN was the better researched.
Oh well, they just torpedoed their own credibility ship. Back to the dry dock with Fox.
All American news is owned by two or three corporations. For some reason they are all in a race to the lowest common denominator of viewership.
Is it bad that I trust my local papers more than the syndicated stuff we find on TV?
Our local paper is pretty decent at reporting events, not sure I would trust them beyond that.
Our local paper can't even get quotes right. My time is better spent talking directly to the people they write about than reading the supposed articles
-
-
-
The book was probably over $200 with the pictures.....
He should be glad...
-
-
-
-
-
