@NetworkNerd said:

I think one about dealing with vendors and engaging them inside and outside of social media might be interesting too.

That's a solid idea. I talked about the fact you should engage them, but haven't really ever written about how. I like it!

@ambarishrh said:

I am still waiting for the dev to give me more info on the type of request/data transfer happens between the tab and server. If it's just a Web service request then my life is easier, webserver with ssl and am done. Initial info is that it's a Web service.

Coming from Apache, I would assume so.

@nadnerB said:

@JaredBusch YMMV. My experience has been good.

I'm giving up on Skype. I'm just giving up my account. I've had scottalanmiller there since Skype was brand new. But I've seldom been as unhappy with a service that I kept around as much as Skype. I'm kind of happy to be done with it. I won't miss that at all. Anyone who only contacts me there is just out of luck.

@scottalanmiller That looks great!
How open to malicious content is it?

ES File Explorer seems to work for me on Android 4.0

Thanks.

It's a cute idea. I wonder how much anyone would care about the games that you can play with it, though. I'm not going to take that with my friends to the bar to play with while waiting for drinks.

Maybe they are like the Silence and you can't remember them once you have looked away.

@Dashrender said:

@scottalanmiller said:

And I want any call to that device to go to me, not to whoever is holding it.

You don't really (at least easily) have this ability now.

So how would AD made this any different?
By turning the device into a multi-user device. That's AD's function, to make things easily multi-user.

@scottalanmiller said:

https://community.nodebb.org/topic/2642/original-post-disappears-thread-remains

Awesome. Thanks!

@nadnerB said:

Job security pro tip: Never bag/disrespect your employer or their products online. The Internet NEVER forgets.

Because it impacts not just that employer but future ones too who see that there is a high risk of you publicly being unsupportive of them while you work there and when you leave.

Let's say Microsoft wants to hire you. They do a search and realize that you have a history of talking poorly about your current employers or their products or just supporting competitor's products while doing so. And talking about them after you are no longer employed. Why would they take a risk on you? It's a high risk for them, employees talking bad about products is far worse than random Internet people.

@scottalanmiller said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

The preview isn't usually open to as many people like it is for Windows 10 though.

What part of this is confusing? I have no idea how you are struggling with this sentence.

It simply says that the Windows 10's preview is open to more people than previews are usually open to.

That wording made sense. His just isn't registering with me.

@thecreativeone91 said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

So how does a site get an SSL without knowing? "CT’s intent is to prevent CAs from issuing public key certificates for a domain without the domain owner’s knowledge." I assume that means if the site is hacked.

No, it does not mean that it has been hacked. This is really easy to do. I'm not sure at what stage you think that there is a verification for this currently but generally there is nothing.

But it has to be used at the domain it's issued for or else it will throw a mismatch error.. Unless it's a whild card cert..

That's a completely different piece of security. If you hijack DNS you completely bypass it.

That worked it was the "Launch Manager" application that enables the brightness keys.

@PSX_Defector said:

Do you need it to ring a bell or to page folks?

The speaker you list will do the trick, but FreePBX can do it with current equipment. It's all about boosting the ring/tip voltage

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Loud+Enviroment+Ring+Bell+or+Siren

Another option:

http://www.algosolutions.com/products/Audible-and-Visual-Alerting/8180-sip-audio-alerter.html

Thanks @PSX_Defector...that is a little cheaper but since they are buying a new business class PC and looking for a new AIO printer, they're looking for something less expensive. They might just add a phone to the shop.

@Dashrender said:

If as Scott mentions that 3rd parties get the usernames and passwords - that's even worse than this breach!

Yes, far worse. Anyone can have an accident. Sharing usernames and passwords is a breach of ethics, not security. I'm positive Dropbox is doing no such thing.

So what was the resolution on this one? I'm sure others would like to know if it was the SIP provider, the Ubiquiti device, or something else entirely.

@thecreativeone91 said:

Yes, Because redirection break sometimes.. also Some users like old habits
I actually never redirect the desktop. and just usually just make the root and the documents redirect 1 in the same. .

@thecreativeone91 I can't say that I've noticed an issue with redirection failing, at least not enough that I worry about giving them a drive letter to access the files directly. But I'll definitely agree with the old habits - but sometimes those habits just need to change - for example, my use of Home Folders. 🙂

@technobabble said:

Right...connections like file sharing, not users like RDP....that was a DOH moment.

Yeah, it is certain types. RDP is limited to one. SMB is limited to 10 or 20.