Cat5/6 100 meters
-
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
-
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Use a repeater
That is called a switch.....
A dumb switch, yeah
-
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
-
@dafyre said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
It might work... It might not. Fiber might be worth the consideration here.
Edit: Cat6 will likely get you connected, but at 150 meters, I don't think you'll always have a solid connection.
The rating of the wiring has nothing to do with it.
Cat3, 5, or 6.
-
@justin867 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Hi,
I believe switch to device limit is 100 meters on cat 5/6. Can i exceed? if i will make it switch to switch by around 150 meters?
Will it work and have link? Yes.
Will it work at 1Gbps Full Duplex? Maybe, but poorly.
You are talking half again the rated length of Ethernet.
People do stupid crap all the time and have it work. That doe snot been it works well or for long.
-
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
Regardless of what he is connecting? Because we have no idea what he is actually cabling for
-
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
Regardless of what he is connecting? Because we have no idea what he is actually cabling for
........................
-
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
Regardless of what he is connecting?
To have 2 Ethernet cables that exceed the limit of the cable, you need a switch in-between the two cables. This repeats the signal.
But it's costly in that you need to have power wherever the first cable ends and the second cable begins. Plus you need to install a switch.
-
You could use media converters on the end of the fiber if your switches don't have Fiber connects. This of course adds costs but you aren't doing something odd like installing a switch to create a daisy-chain ethernet cable. .
-
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
Regardless of what he is connecting?
To have 2 Ethernet cables that exceed the limit of the cable, you need a switch in-between the two cables. This repeats the signal.
But it's costly in that you need to have power wherever the first cable ends and the second cable begins. Plus you need to install a switch.
Yes, I understand. I said use a repeater at the top. Then JB was JB, even though when you say "switch" it's synonymous with a lot of things that aren't required of a repeater, such as mac address tables. That doesn't matter though because JB just wants to be a dick all of the time.
I ask for clarity as there are very few things that are universally the right decision and I get a giant ellipsis.
Typical Jared though.
-
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Which a small 8 port would work here, but is it worth putting in a switch and needing power there over just running fiber?
Best Answer.
Because any thing else requires power.
Regardless of what he is connecting?
To have 2 Ethernet cables that exceed the limit of the cable, you need a switch in-between the two cables. This repeats the signal.
But it's costly in that you need to have power wherever the first cable ends and the second cable begins. Plus you need to install a switch.
Yes, I understand. I said use a repeater at the top. Then JB was JB, even though when you say "switch" it's synonymous with a lot of things that aren't required of a repeater, such as mac address tables. That doesn't matter though because JB just wants to be a dick all of the time.
I ask for clarity as there are very few things that are universally the right decision and I get a giant ellipsis.
Typical Jared though.
You can be ass hurt all you want, but you are still wrong. If you want to drag this out, I can go there.
Q. WTF is a repeater?
A. A switch.Q. Does a switch require power?
A. Yes.Q. So does a repeater power?
A. Yes.Shall we move on? Or would you like to be all whiny bitch some more?
-
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
when you say "switch" it's synonymous with a lot of things that aren't required of a repeater, such as mac address tables.
WTF does this have to do with anything? You are now making shit up out of whole cloth.
-
lol, you guys are funny. thanks for all the posts.
-
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@wirestyle22 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
when you say "switch" it's synonymous with a lot of things that aren't required of a repeater, such as mac address tables.
WTF does this have to do with anything? You are now making shit up out of whole cloth.
Please shut the fuck up Jared. I have no idea why you gain pleasure from being an asshole. It amazes me that we have mutual friends.
-
@justin867 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
lol, you guys are funny. thanks for all the posts.
Anytime. I did quote your directly to keep those in context on my answers for you.
-
i could use this with my ruckus icx 7150 for this project.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J66FQKC/ref=sspa_dk_detail_1?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B01J66FQKC -
Fiber to Ethernet converters also need power, but only at the ends. Which at least this way you have one cable and don't need to think about running electric to wherever the Ethernet would end up and the second Ethernet starts.
So half one half the other, but I'd go fiber before I daisy chain ethernet.
-
@justin867 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
i could use this with my ruckus icx 7150 for this project.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J66FQKC/ref=sspa_dk_detail_1?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B01J66FQKCEven though it says "direct bury" I'd put conduit in and pull through that. I'd be pissed if somehow the fiber got cut.
Depending on where you are, you might be required by law to put conduit and cover the conduit with cement and to put a notice flag in with it.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Depending on where you are, you might be required by law to put conduit and cover the conduit with cement and to put a notice flag in with it.
You need to GTFO of NY...
-
@JaredBusch said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
@DustinB3403 said in Cat5/6 100 meters:
Depending on where you are, you might be required by law to put conduit and cover the conduit with cement and to put a notice flag in with it.
You need to GTFO of NY...
Tell me about it.
