What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.
is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?
You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.
As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.
Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.
The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.
Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .
-
We've got the "can't get to the store, car won't move" problem, but we are all wondering if he has opened teh garage door yet.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
We've got the "can't get to the store, car won't move" problem, but we are all wondering if he has opened teh garage door yet.
The car would happily move through a garage door. . .
-
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.
is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?
You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.
As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.
Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.
The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.
Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .
Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.
is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?
You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.
As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.
Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.
The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.
Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .
Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.
On every linux system I've used credentials still had to be provided explicitly for that connection.
Edit: I've only connected to windows shares a few times (so take it for what its worth)
-
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.
is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?
You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.
As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.
Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.
The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.
Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .
Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.
On every linux system I've used credentials still had to be provided explicitly for that connection.
That was my point. You hit the nail on the head.
-
Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention
-
Looking at ATA devices.
-
@rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention
WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention
WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.
Sounds like a Loomis Simmons special.
-
I've commented.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention
WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.
"Act now and we'll throw in the Caribbean vacation ABSOLUTELY FREEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!"
-
It's not often that you get to see video like this.. but holy crow. This is here,... just south of me. Can't imagine what the driver of the mini van / SUV thought as they hit plywood and went for a leap... YIKES!
http://www.wkyt.com/content/news/Deadly-crash-caught-on-surveillance-camrera-452515543.html
-
Finally getting around to reading about Zabbix. Yum
-
@eddiejennings That's a tasty subject
Have fun with it, it will be very helpful to you. -
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings That's a tasty subject
Have fun with it, it will be very helpful to you.We have no useful monitoring (some with NewRelic, but nothing that gives information about our networking equipment). I looked into PRTG a long time ago. With the VoIP deployment nearing its end, this is the next thing on the must-happen list for company IT projects.
-
@mattspeller Crazy Power Rangers!
-
@eddiejennings That's good.
-
Then there is this guy that is trying to blame Vmware for his own mistakes.
-
Just scraped a 'new' pc together from leftovers. i72600k, 12GB ram, 160GB ssd.
windows 10, office 2013.
Just realizing how awful Office 2013 themes are. glad i never had to use it.
blinding white, less blinding white, white with some light gray bits.
Just atrocious. 2016 not much better but 'Gray' is actually gray in 2016, not white with a gray line across the screen.
