ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Single Space or Double Space

    Water Closet
    typography time waster
    14
    113
    44.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      Cool I learned a few things today.

      OK learned or Learnt?

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Learnt is what I use. It's the traditional one.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said:

          They "gave way" decades ago. No matter what you think, or how you were taught.

          Language is a living thing. It is always changing, written or verbal, it does not matter. There are no rules for how a language changes. It is changed by the users of the language as they use it.

          There is a line, though. While that is true (for English, French does have a definition) to some degree and that is what the Oxford Dictionary is all about it is not how Americans treat it (the Websters dictionaries are about defining use before it is used, not documenting how it is used) but if you allow ANYTHING then the shortcuts that kids use today is suddenly "acceptable."

          Where do you draw lines? It sounds gr8 2 call it a living language but pretty soon we ain't using a real language anymore and noone understands each other.

          The problem with the pure living language theory is that you can't having proper spelling or proper grammar and communications suffers or fails. Soon ironic means coincidental and there is no word left for irony and cloud means hosted.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            Cool I learned a few things today.

            OK learned or Learnt?

            http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/words/learnt-vs-learned

            Learned is by far the more common. Learnt, I feel, sounds better and follows the better pattern. Learned is the more common on both sides of the pond. Learnt is rare in the US, but common (just not the more common) in the UK.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said:

              They "gave way" decades ago. No matter what you think, or how you were taught.

              When, though? Long after the style was taught. Style started to change in low end printing around 1961. But when did the major style guides make the change to reflect the rise of the new style?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                The upside to a living language is that the use of traditional forms remains continually valid and newer styles take over but there is generally a use of the older, more formal (normally) styles to allow for those who wish to have formal, stylized, educated styles while others can have valid, simper, more fashionable styles.

                In English this has been a standard migration for as long as the language has been recorded. Unlike French which is strictly regulated and effectively does not change, English mutates at an incredible rate. This causes a lot of issues, however, because regional differences rapidly make communications within the language difficult.

                The example I always use of miscommunications is the Indian subcontinent commonly believing that revert is a fancy form of reply and miscommunicating with other regions.

                But an example of a good living language change from the same region is the verbal use of "action".

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Carnival Boy @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  Double spacing is from the hand written era. It continued into the typewriter era. It continued into the computer era. It's how the language has always been written. It is not an artifact of typewriters no matter what BS someone is trying to sell you.

                  Surely it's from the typesetting era? You can't have a double or single space with hand-writing, you can only have a space of undefined size.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
                    last edited by

                    @Carnival-Boy said:

                    Surely it's from the typesetting era? You can't have a double or single space with hand-writing, you can only have a space of undefined size.

                    I left much more space between sentences when handwriting than between words. I think that most people do. I was taught to do that. Apparently that became wrong at some point, but handwriting normally looked that way,

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      For example, that is double spacing between sentences...

                      http://summerthinks.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/handwriting.jpg

                      Looks normal, right?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        But if you go back to medieval handwriting, spacing was rare. So maybe the printing press with movable type introduced the idea. If it did it was over 500 years ago. My guess is that it came about with handwriting first, but near to the same time. They would not have done it in print for no reason, it took extra effort and cost more.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Of course, handwriting has never been about good legibility anyway...

                          http://clairegebben.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1847-sample1.jpg

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            Of course, handwriting has never been about good legibility anyway...

                            http://clairegebben.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1847-sample1.jpg

                            No Sh*t, right!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              There is a reason that I don't handwrite things. It's just a way of torturing the people that you make attempt to read it.

                              DashrenderD JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                There is a reason that I don't handwrite things. It's just a way of torturing the people that you make attempt to read it.

                                Yeah I'm in the same boat. When I was signing the contracts for my mortgage, the lender asked me to not use my actual signature and instead write my name in normal cursive... LOL

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Ha ha, I can't even do that anymore. I've not used cursive since elementary school. It has no purpose anywhere else. Why did it even exist except to be pretentious. It's never been easy to read.

                                  thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • thanksajdotcomT
                                    thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    Ha ha, I can't even do that anymore. I've not used cursive since elementary school. It has no purpose anywhere else. Why did it even exist except to be pretentious. It's never been easy to read.

                                    Signatures. That's the only reason left.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      My signature would be a stretch to call cursive.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        There is a reason that I don't handwrite things. It's just a way of torturing the people that you make attempt to read it.

                                        Including myself.....

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          http://img-9gag-ftw.9cache.com/photo/aVQAWzM_460s.jpg

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • nadnerBN
                                            nadnerB
                                            last edited by

                                            The common comma:
                                            ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...........,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,!!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,&(#$^&#^$*&#^,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 4 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post