Business thinking - PC replacements
-
@jaredbusch Yes, that is what I made the statement of Media Installer, every time I needed Mountain Lion I needed to buy a DVD through the Apple Store.
-
Do all your users do the same tasks? Can you justify replacing 20% of your computers to give the power users new machines? Then in year two or three trickle those computers down to other users and get the power users a new batch. That's what I do in CAD environments. The power CAD users always have fast machines and their two and three year old machines are plenty fast for normal office work.
I like the continuous replacement model because you don't get bogged down in a replacement project for months. It's just a background task that entry level people can do.
-
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Do all your users do the same tasks? Can you justify replacing 20% of your computers to give the power users new machines? Then in year two or three trickle those computers down to other users and get the power users a new batch. That's what I do in CAD environments. The power CAD users always have fast machines and their two and three year old machines are plenty fast for normal office work.
I like the continuous replacement model because you don't get bogged down in a replacement project for months. It's just a background task that entry level people can do.
I tend to be a fan of trickle down desktops as well. Takes more manual labour, but saves a ton on hardware investments. And it tends to create a chance for everyone to get regular updates instead of just some people.
-
This post is deleted! -
Some additional reasons to upgrade hardware include:
- current warranty for parts and service
- availablitity of parts, for parts replacement. as servers get older and older, it may be difficult to find parts, and those you do find may cost more.
- it's all about cost, and time which == cost.
-
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Do all your users do the same tasks? Can you justify replacing 20% of your computers to give the power users new machines? Then in year two or three trickle those computers down to other users and get the power users a new batch. That's what I do in CAD environments. The power CAD users always have fast machines and their two and three year old machines are plenty fast for normal office work.
I like the continuous replacement model because you don't get bogged down in a replacement project for months. It's just a background task that entry level people can do.
Yes everyone pretty much does the same thing. There is little need/if any for anyone in the office to have a more powerful than anyone else.
So this thought process doesn't really apply.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Do all your users do the same tasks? Can you justify replacing 20% of your computers to give the power users new machines? Then in year two or three trickle those computers down to other users and get the power users a new batch. That's what I do in CAD environments. The power CAD users always have fast machines and their two and three year old machines are plenty fast for normal office work.
I like the continuous replacement model because you don't get bogged down in a replacement project for months. It's just a background task that entry level people can do.
I tend to be a fan of trickle down desktops as well. Takes more manual labour, but saves a ton on hardware investments. And it tends to create a chance for everyone to get regular updates instead of just some people.
eh? everyone to get regular updates? I have two to general generations of PCs here. Moving to a forced 5 year replacement plan, I suppose people through a trickle down could get a different piece of hardware, but doesn't really this shouldn't affect user's function.
-
@darek-hamann said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Some additional reasons to upgrade hardware include:
- current warranty for parts and service
- availablitity of parts, for parts replacement. as servers get older and older, it may be difficult to find parts, and those you do find may cost more.
- it's all about cost, and time which == cost.
We're talking about PCs/laptops, in servers these things make total sense, but desktops frequently outlast their warranty time frame. Also considering the cost of longer warranty versus low failure rate which could require a machine replacement - the occasional replacement has been fair less expensive than the cost of adding the warranties?
i.e. We purchased 30 laptops in 2007, we still had 27 of them in service in 2014. Adding a 3 year warranty would have cost significantly more than the 3 replacement units.
-
@Dashrender the best thing to do is just budget in the costs yearly even if you don't do it. so in 5-7 years you know you cna just do a mass swap and be done with it.
-
@jaredbusch said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@Dashrender the best thing to do is just budget in the costs yearly even if you don't do it. so in 5-7 years you know you cna just do a mass swap and be done with it.
This is actually my proposed plan in my OP.
-
Basically... work out roughly a replacement frequency that is sensible throughout the farm. If that is ever four, five or eight years average, whatever. Now put away every year towards that, consider that money "spent" whether it is or not. Have it at the ready and buy new machines when the right time comes. There is really no better way to handle it.
You can't tell ahead of time what a good replacement time is going to be, nearly all of the deciding factors would be complete guesses today. OS compatibility, security features, changes in needs, hardware failure rates, changes in office staff, changes in work environment and so forth. You can't predict that stuff two years out, let alone eight. Nor can you tell when desktops will go on sale, go up in price, suddenly get cheaper, etc. You just have to be ready.
-
Thanks - I'll be sending this along shortly.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Now put away every year towards that, consider that money "spent" whether it is or not. Have it at the ready and buy new machines when the right time comes. There is really no better way to handle it.
That doesn't work for many businesses because you get taxed on money you carry over. So essentially for a business to use that model, they would have to do something else with the money all the other years, and then get hit with a huge bill in one year. Add insult to injury if you have an apps that have to be updated because your OS was updated.
-
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@scottalanmiller said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Now put away every year towards that, consider that money "spent" whether it is or not. Have it at the ready and buy new machines when the right time comes. There is really no better way to handle it.
That doesn't work for many businesses because you get taxed on money you carry over. So essentially for a business to use that model, they would have to do something else with the money all the other years, and then get hit with a huge bill in one year. Add insult to injury if you have an apps that have to be updated because your OS was updated.
There are systems for making that go away, though, like leasing.
-
@scottalanmiller What advantages would a company gain by leasing servers? Are there some hard and fast rules to consider it or not or would that be more of an accounting question?
-
Why do people keep coming back to servers in a thread clearly titled about PCs?
-
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@scottalanmiller said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Now put away every year towards that, consider that money "spent" whether it is or not. Have it at the ready and buy new machines when the right time comes. There is really no better way to handle it.
That doesn't work for many businesses because you get taxed on money you carry over. So essentially for a business to use that model, they would have to do something else with the money all the other years, and then get hit with a huge bill in one year. Add insult to injury if you have an apps that have to be updated because your OS was updated.
This can be a soft setup, sure the virtual accrual can be there, so the bosses know the money is earmarked, but if it's not really used, use it for something else so it's not taxed or it gets taxed and moved out. but don't just buy PCs to buy PCs - that's a waste of money.
-
@dashrender My apologies. My question was regarding leasing, as it was brought up by SAM. Sorry if it was so far off the topic of desktops.
-
@dashrender said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@mike-davis said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@scottalanmiller said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
Now put away every year towards that, consider that money "spent" whether it is or not. Have it at the ready and buy new machines when the right time comes. There is really no better way to handle it.
That doesn't work for many businesses because you get taxed on money you carry over. So essentially for a business to use that model, they would have to do something else with the money all the other years, and then get hit with a huge bill in one year. Add insult to injury if you have an apps that have to be updated because your OS was updated.
This can be a soft setup, sure the virtual accrual can be there, so the bosses know the money is earmarked, but if it's not really used, use it for something else so it's not taxed or it gets taxed and moved out. but don't just buy PCs to buy PCs - that's a waste of money.
That, too, yes. Show the savings from years past so that they understand that it needs to be spent this year.
-
@wrx7m said in Business thinking - PC replacements:
@scottalanmiller What advantages would a company gain by leasing servers? Are there some hard and fast rules to consider it or not or would that be more of an accounting question?
It's nearly all about accounting. But it can also mean support options, too. Leasing often ties to support.
