One of our vendors alerted us about this patch last week.

@scottalanmiller said:

We lead with geo-specific deny rules to block regions before allowing ports.

And in that case it makes sense. You're blocking all traffic from China or Russia, for example. Then you allow the ports you want open but those countries are blocked, and maybe every other country is fine (hopefully you haven't blocked Spain... ;)), and then you deny the rest. That also makes logistical sense. I don't disagree with @thecreativeone91. It all comes down to what your objective is and then determining the best way to approach it.

@scottalanmiller said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

You don't know their names? Anyone I've ever had allowed to remote in has to had to have paper work on file and we did background checks on them ourselves before they were allowed in ours systems. When it comes to any issues that may occur this information is really needed.

When you are dealing with helpdesk outsourcing that can be tough as you are dealing with a pool of people, not a named engineer.

I've always done if for the people that were on vendor support contracts. Not a big deal just meant every time there was a new employee there was a day or two delay til they could do anything with their software on our network. Much of it was required by regulations anyway.

JIRA is super affordable at just $10 for 10 users (If you host it)

@thecreativeone91 said:

windows will likely get replace with something else (linux etc) in the enterprise. but that's a good while off.

That's been happening for years. The shift to Linux from Windows has been huge.

Ran through a few things, and happened upon the uninstall / repair option.
I ran the repair, which subsequently required a reboot (no surprising on a system service).

Currently the system performance has increased back to 'normal'.
memory2.png

@NetworkNerd said:

Supposedly there is no software to install on any endpoint. But without that, how are you going to handle and filter traffic for roaming devices? Maybe I missed something as I glanced over their literature.

probably because either they forgot about roaming devices, or they expect you to set DNS to their public IPs regardless of where you are, which we all know probably won't work.

http://www.mangolassi.it/topic/60/our-community-guidelines/2

It appears that I need to make some things clear in our guidelines once again. @thanksajdotcom especially please read these over again.

So you rent your space and get storjcoin. Right now 1 storjcoin is 0.0191194 usd

I need to add some process after discussing with the Project Managers, just to ensure that we don't end up using 100% resources of servers and if something new comes i will end up terminating some to accommodate new ones. Idea is to ensure to have some policies like, x number of hours/days needed to fire up x type of SP farm (single server, multi server- 6 servers, 8 servers etc), If there are new projects coming in, share the infrastructure proposal with us, so we can check if there are rooms for this new setup, if not order new servers to provision etc.

@thanksajdotcom Ok

I'm a heavy Adobe Audition user, but I use an older version that I think is much better and I am dreading the day that I might have to go to the CC version.

So I think I'm best off purchasing a new wildcard cert for a different domain to the one we use for Exchange. This way I leave Exchange and our main domain UCC cert alone, and our intranet sites use their own domain name externally (eg intranet1.domain2.com; intranet2.domain2.com).

Does that sound ok?

Nice! I'll check it out!

Now my next question:
How do I point a subdomain to a hostname attached to as specific port as something other than a web redirect?

Basically I want plex.thanksaj.com to go to ip.of.plex.server:32400/web. That or do something with an Apache virtual host for that and figure out how to get Plex to run on Port 80.

Just had a DOH moment...

I changed the IP of thanksaj.com but not www.thanksaj.com, which with the C@C server having issues, that would do it.

Had to reboot a couple times. It finally seems to be coming up again.

@IRJ said:

@Dashrender said:

@IRJ said:

I contacted Samsung and they feel that its the cable or the charger. I dont feel that it is since I get same results with other chargers and cables, but they are telling me to bring my phone in to my local wireless store.

huh? they aren't just going to send you a replacement?

I was told they dont send out replacement chargers or cables. They only service phones.

Wow, that would be like Dell telling me that they won't replace my power cord while I still have a valid warranty. Even the batteries are normally covered for the first year by the warranties.

Sounds like another reason to bail on Samsung.

I have 2X for remote access. It will be improved performance wise when I put it on some new hardware. It seems a tad sluggish on older stuff