ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. manxam
    3. Posts
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 10
    • Posts 360
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Remote Access for home user

      @Dashrender said in Remote Access for home user:

      @manxam said in Remote Access for home user:

      @fuznutz04 : Keep an eye out for the "hidden" hibernate that doesn't show up under "Plan settings" (only sleep and display). I've seen multiple systems that have "Hibernate after" configured under "Sleep" in the advanced settings as default.

      There's also the problem where some systems become broken and once a system goes to sleep, it will continue going to sleep no matter what after something like 2 mins of non use. Rebooting fixes it, until it goes to sleep again... there is a fix somewhere in these threads too, reg fix.

      Hahah, yeah. I was part of that thread too having been bit by it myself. Thankfully I haven't seen that behaviour in over a year.
      Your thread : https://mangolassi.it/topic/18166/windows-10-goes-to-sleep-outside-listed-sleep-times
      My thread : https://mangolassi.it/topic/17731/windows-10-ignoring-display-sleep-inactivity-settings

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Remote Access for home user

      @fuznutz04 : Keep an eye out for the "hidden" hibernate that doesn't show up under "Plan settings" (only sleep and display). I've seen multiple systems that have "Hibernate after" configured under "Sleep" in the advanced settings as default.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: IPsec Site-to-Site

      @Obsolesce : Because, while 128-bit AES has not yet been cracked (that we're aware of), many "governing bodies" consider it the absolute minimum encryption level -- assuming that they approve its use at all.
      Taurex' chart below is one such example.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: IPsec Site-to-Site

      So long as you're using half decent encryption (128-bit AES or higher) there's not much that's more secure aside from having no connection at all 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: WYSIWYG HTML editors

      @scottalanmiller : Not sure what you mean by a table editor?
      Codepen is where all the cool stuff is published. It lets you build pretty much anything...
      You can choose html, css, and JS pre-processors etc. which makes designing new stuff easy.

      i.e. https://codepen.io/TurkAysenur/pen/RwWKYMO

      Definitely NOT a wysiwyg designer though...

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Bits and Bytes (1983)

      ...and I never realized there was a Bits and Bites 2. Looking at the episodes I remember watching them but never put 2+2 together.
      Billy Van took over the show for a few more episodes without Goy as the instructor.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Bits and Bytes (1983)

      Just found this thread and can say that I watched these as a kid and loved them.
      This program wasn't around for that long but in the early 90's another program took over in a similar fashion "Dotto's Data Cafe". Much higher level but I loved them just the same.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Use a php file to create a dynamic Yealink Remote Address book of FreePBX extensions

      @SJ2020 : If you create a phpinfo.php file in the same location as ylab.php. Do you get a nicely formatted PHP Info page or just raw script?

      phpinfo.php

      <?php
      
      // Show all information, defaults to INFO_ALL
      phpinfo();
      
      ?>
      
      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: This app has been blocked for your protection

      @CCWTech : This can usually be fixed by finding the exe, right clicking and choosing properties, and then checking the "Unblock" checkbox at the bottom right of the General tab.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Jitsi Meet lacks basic camera controls

      Can you rotate the stream using ffmpeg and set it up as another camera source?
      Like HERE

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Jitsi Meet lacks basic camera controls

      Guess you're working like this from now on :
      c8e4d66d-4587-4488-b38b-64880b85c3c1-image.png

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: How to set up Unifi Controller For Unrouted Private Network?

      @WrCombs : I was going to suggest that the order of my comment wasn't important. In fact, I'd suggest the latter before the former 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: How to set up Unifi Controller For Unrouted Private Network?

      @WrCombs : Factory reset button and a glass of scotch...

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: ZeroTier Flow Rules

      I am curious to see what works for @JaredBusch as I could see this coming in handy very soon...

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: ZeroTier Flow Rules

      That runs counterintuitive to their site and confused me as well.
      They have a sample showing basic layout with the BLOCK at first, ACCEPT after and explain what they're allowing, and then at the end they have ACCEPT;

      They then go on to say that this blocks X, but allows Y. When, with that final ACCEPT, you'd think it would also allow Z.

      I dunno..

      EDIT : maybe I missed a "break"?

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: ZeroTier Flow Rules

      This is strictly a guess by looking through their documentation as I do not have a ZT node here to test.

      drop                      # drop cannot be overridden by capabilities
        not ethertype ipv4      # frame is not ipv4
        and not ethertype arp   # AND is not ARP
        and not ethertype ipv6  # AND is not ipv6
      
      accept			  # but accept
        ipprotocol rdp	  # RDP (not sure if this is both TCP AND UDP)
      
      accept			  # and accept
        ipprotocol icmp     	  # ICMP
      
      accept;			  # This is required since default is 'drop'.
      
      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Re-Image Program?

      The fact that Chrome won't even let me go to (what I assume is) their site without warning me, I'd judge it to be malware.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Exchange 2013 not sending email to Junk Folder

      Wonder if this is a legacy setting brought forward from SBS 2008.. Regardless, changing it to 4 like you did should likely fix your issue going forward.

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Exchange 2013 not sending email to Junk Folder

      Note the when created and when changed on yours vs mine.
      This one is default enabled.
      Yours appears to have changed 3 years after setup.

      Is it possible that this company had an external mail filter at some point?

      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • RE: Exchange 2013 not sending email to Junk Folder

      @JaredBusch :

      RunspaceId                            : 14a9f9e7-80a4-4a8f-86eb-a44d6038b921
      Name                                  : ContentFilterConfig
      RejectionResponse                     : Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.
      OutlookEmailPostmarkValidationEnabled : True
      BypassedRecipients                    : {}
      QuarantineMailbox                     :
      SCLRejectThreshold                    : 7
      SCLRejectEnabled                      : True
      SCLDeleteThreshold                    : 9
      SCLDeleteEnabled                      : False
      SCLQuarantineThreshold                : 9
      SCLQuarantineEnabled                  : False
      BypassedSenders                       : {}
      BypassedSenderDomains                 : {}
      Enabled                               : True
      ExternalMailEnabled                   : True
      InternalMailEnabled                   : False
      AdminDisplayName                      :
      ExchangeVersion                       : 0.1 (8.0.535.0)
      DistinguishedName                     : CN=ContentFilterConfig,CN=Message Hygiene,CN=Transport
                                              Settings,CN=Mail,CN=Microsoft
                                              Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=Mail,DC=contoso,DC
      Identity                              : ContentFilterConfig
      Guid                                  : a21710e1-71a9-40b8-ac79-8655de1cc5ef
      ObjectCategory                        : Mail.Consoto.com/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Message-Hygien
                                              onfig
      ObjectClass                           : {top, msExchAgent, msExchMessageHygieneContentFilterConfig}
      WhenChanged                           : 10/13/2015 12:01:31 PM
      WhenCreated                           : 10/13/2015 12:01:31 PM
      WhenChangedUTC                        : 10/13/2015 4:01:31 PM
      WhenCreatedUTC                        : 10/13/2015 4:01:31 PM
      OrganizationId                        :
      Id                                    : ContentFilterConfig
      OriginatingServer                     : data.Mail.Consoto.com
      IsValid                               : True
      ObjectState                           : Unchanged
      
      posted in IT Discussion
      M
      manxam
    • 1 / 1