Topics created by Dashrender

I see that issue constantly. I'm not sure if it has an issue detecting the bottom or if inline images throw it off.

Another one for @psychobunny

I get that in iPhone from time to time too.

I am getting this problem now too. Hadn't seen it previously.

I would have a cold spare ready but not replace proactively unless, you know. Like ten years old.

@david.wiese said:

all i know is that i stayed with the 2 year contract plan on verizon and here is why.

Cheaper, we each have 2 gigs of data (all that we need) and only pay $60 per month We both went with a customized Moto X and payed just $0.01 for the phone.

If we went with the Verizon Edge plan, the phones would have cost $16.66 / month x 24 months is $399.84 per phone x $130 per month in voice/data with 4 gigs = $3919.68
If we went with the Verizion More everything plan it costs $.01 per phone upfront x $150 per month in voice/data with 4 gigs = $3600

So not only did i save up front on the cost of the phone i am saving $319.68 over the two years.

You get ripped off when using the next/edge plans and you are still under a contract no matter which way you go unless you purchase the device outright.

edit:
If we went with the Verizon Edge plan, the phones would have cost $16.66 / month x 24 months is $399.84 per phone x $130 per month in voice/data with 10 gigs = $3919.68
If we went with the Verizion More everything plan it costs $.01 per phone upfront x $180 per month in voice/data with 10 gigs = $4320

So in this case with 10 gigs of data it is cheaper to go the Edge route where you will save $400.32 over 24 months. With higher data usage the price goes down for Edge and up for More Everything.

I moved off of verizon after keeping the same account for 21 years. Saved a fortune leaving. They really burned me a lot to get me to leave. Very glad that I did.

ASM is Firefox's C to JavaScript compiler.

@Dashrender said:

Wow a reproducible error, found I have 🙂

From what the error is, I'm pretty confident it is Node.js code that is the problem. Server side producing the wrong list.

@alexntg said:

@scottalanmiller said:

Looks like the hands are bleeding.

It's not a clap. It's stigmata.

LOL!!

Even more puzzling is that this problem seems to be caused by a video driver.

Cool. No have not seen that before.

@IRJ said:

I dont think EU is what the US is after. I think its China

You might be surprised.

@alexntg said:

I was using Firefox 28 on Server 2008R2, but my browser just updated a moment ago to 29. Let's see if that helps.

No difference.

@Dashrender said:

@Katie said:

Why does he need a secondary calendar?
Perhaps a shared calendar is in order instead of the delegates system.

Category changes from the primary works just fine to delegates...

Currently it appears that we are going to be forced to use the primary calendar - but then that means that the user can't use it for their own personal stuff.

How do you create a shared calendar in O365? (I haven't even googled this yet). As long as we don't need another license for a shared calendar it will probably be a good solution. Another question/thought. What about a sharepoint calendar? Do they integrate with Exchange? Can I get a SP calendar on an iPhone like I can a secondary calendar? How do I add a shared calendar to an iPhone?

Thanks

Shared mailboxes can be created in the Exchange Management section of Office 365. These would not be accessible via ActiveSync. They also don't consume licenses. SharePoint calendars do synchronize with Outlook. In theory, you can add them to an iPhone using CalDAV, though I haven't tried it myself.

@alexntg said:

@Minion-Queen said:

Just reach out to me tomorrow and I have Alex do that with you if you would like.

Apparently I've been volunteered.

Hopefully I'm not that much of a bore 🙂

That's just it.. RSOP (or whatever the GPM runs as a sorta equivalent) showed no other GPOs being applied.

The systems weren't being assigned to the OU they were in, even though they were clearly in said OU, so the GPO wasn't being applied to them. It was very odd.

@technobabble said:

A doctor was reading what was required of him for documentation and basically said that it was too much information to give and he should decide what is necessary to document. I also heard office staff whine that they would actually have to provide vital signs for visits.

Imagine if IT pros said that about keeping baseline information on systems. Just shows the horrifically low standard that we set for doctors here. It's no wonder no one trusts them. If they were junior system admins, they'd be fired. No one needs useless "professionals" who know so little about or care so little about their careers or their charges.

For the Empire!

...Oh, wait, wrong empire.

It is entirely possible I am mixing up memory.. I will tinker later tonight on this if I remember when I sit down to work tonight.