Imaging Rights - Windows - Looking for clarification
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Restore a computer an a workable state.
Conditions being, that I don't have to sit through 6 hours of windows updates.
Why would you not use imaging rights for that? So cheap, would pay for itself after the third machine easily.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Restore a computer an a workable state.
Why not use backups?
Not sure, guess I've never thought about it in that light. But I've always just restored (imaged) a machine or purchased a license for Windows if it needed it.
How would you build a deployable image with a backup. Generally it doesn't make an ISO.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
But I've always just restored (imaged)
Stop stating it like that. If you are using the restore ISO, you are neither restoring nor imaging, you are installing. You know that imaging doesn't mean this at all, this is very confusing both to us and I think to you to try to push this word where it has no place.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
How would you build a deployable image with a backup. Generally it doesn't make an ISO.
Use a bare metal restore tool. You need to take image backups to do a bare metal restore. It's all about planning.
I'd never do this, though, SO easy to get imaging rights and do it so much better.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
But I've always just restored (imaged)
Stop stating it like that. If you are using the restore ISO, you are neither restoring nor imaging, you are installing. You know that imaging doesn't mean this at all, this is very confusing both to us and I think to you to try to push this word where it has no place.
Sorry.
-
Free Bare Metal Backup and Restore for Windows:
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Generally it doesn't make an ISO.
Only because you are using the wrong tools for the job
-
My definition of Imaging is the act of restoring a computer through any automated method.
So it's difficult to let go of that mindset.
But building an image seems to be a completely separate process, albeit the act of installing it is where I've had contentions.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
My definition of Imaging is the act of restoring a computer through any automated method.
Out of curiosity, where did that come from? The generic term for imaging refers to making an image of a system and deploying back as an image (as opposed to installing normally via files.) Even generically it has always been a specific term meaning a block level writing of data which has nothing to do with automation.
In the Windows world there is a stricter definition used to ensure that licensing is clear that goes even further to define what it is.
But no matter what, the idea of automation was never associated with imaging. Many imaging systems are automated in the enterprise space, but the bulk of them in the SMB, I think, are not.
The most common imaging use case is to make a single master image and install it manually on each machine. Might not be recommended, but this is an extremely common imaging use case and what the majority of small businesses that I know of decide to do as the effort is so low and the payoff so high.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
But building an image seems to be a completely separate process, albeit the act of installing it is where I've had contentions.
Taking an image, modifying an image and imaging a system would be three distinct tasks. But all related to imaging. There is also the confusing use of the term "image" to refer to the ISO which is, in fact, an image of a DVD however the standard Windows ISO image does not image the OS onto the system but installs it through a file method.
Not all images image things.
-
My guess is that it is the DVD image that is causing the terminology confusion. The DVD image gets updated, but it isn't used to image the system. Not entirely, anyway. It used to have no imaging at all. Microsoft actually does some imaging under the hood but it is complex and would add to the confusion if we discuss it here. For all intents and purposes, Windows ISOs do not image systems.
-
@scottalanmiller To th eprevious quote,
The idea of imaging (even though I know what it expressly means) is just the term as a verb.
Its an act of performing a system restoration to a "workable state".
VL is very cheap, and totally worth it in my opinion as well.
Just my mindset of the definition, maybe I'm stubborn.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller To th eprevious quote,
The idea of imaging (even though I know what it expressly means) is just the term as a verb.
Its an act of performing a system restoration to a "workable state".
I'm wondering the source of that, though. Imaging is such an important technical term in IT, I'm surprised it has not caused a lot of other problems using imaging to mean restoring and/or installing. Have you heard other people in IT use it to mean something like that? Maybe this is common, but this is the first I've ever heard of it to mean something other than imaging
-
As on SW it has always been a variable definition because of the confusion of the term "imaging".
Only an assumption at this point, as I don't really care to think to heavily about it, but I probably settled on this definition when I was first starting out in IT, young and impressionable.
And having an incorrect definition simply set it.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
As on SW it has always been a variable definition because of the confusion of the term "imaging".
I've never seen that used that way there. If you see it happen, let me know. I would have definitely said something if I saw that. I see imaging used all the time there, but never to mean something else.
-
@scottalanmiller My laptop came with a DVD that doesn't just "install windows"... It takes the manufacturer's OEM image (all of the software, etc, etc) and wipes my hard drive and loads that image onto my hard drive, deleting all of my current information and putting it back juts like it came from the factory. That is restoring an image to my computer.
Now If I just take a Windows 8 retail DVD and plop it into my laptop's DVD drive, then , yeah, that is installing Windows...
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller My laptop came with a DVD that doesn't just "install windows"... It takes the manufacturer's OEM image (all of the software, etc, etc) and wipes my hard drive and loads that image onto my hard drive, deleting all of my current information and putting it back juts like it came from the factory. That is restoring an image to my computer.
It can do that with or without an image. It just means it does not save anything that was there (and that your OEM hates you.) They do use some imaging under the hood, but it is generally not a full image either. But it can be, depends what the OEM does.
-
My previous laptop used PartitionMagic to do its thing. 8-)
If my laptop is broken so badly that I need to re-image... I deserve to lose all my files, lol. (Fortunately, I'm familiar enough with Linux that this hasn't happened to me recently)
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller To th eprevious quote,
The idea of imaging (even though I know what it expressly means) is just the term as a verb.
Its an act of performing a system restoration to a "workable state".
No, that's not right at all - I know I'm jumping in after this conversation is probably over, but restoring to a workable state is just that a restore - it has nothing to do with imaging.
As Scott is saying - Imaging is the act of copying byte for byte a duplicate system from one drive to another. Using a DVD to install (or reinstall Windows) is just that installing windows, not imaging windows.
