Ridiculous Words Lacking from the Google Chrome Dictionary
-
And, of course....
leapt
-
I'll pay more attention from now on to the exacts, thanks to this thread. The biggest one for me is always "remoted".
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Easy first ones: virtualization and virtualize
These both seem to be words I use a lot... and Chrome throws a fit every time. I've added them both to dictionary now.
-
@thanksaj said:
I'll pay more attention from now on to the exacts, thanks to this thread. The biggest one for me is always "remoted".
That one, at least, is a less common and new word. No one said "remoted" in, say, the 1970s. But yes, it is missing and I just added it too.
-
The Latin plural of virus: viri.
-
What about repeatability
-
It has inefficiencies but lacks efficiencies. What the crap, Google?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
It has inefficiencies but lacks efficiencies. What the crap, Google?
I've always suspected that they were lacking certain efficiencies.
...
lol at their expense. -
Got another one... natively.
-
I don't blame Google for not having this one but it needs to be added: performant
-
And, of course moreso and lessso.
-
And Google lacks the proper plural spelling of formula: formulæ
-
I think that Google skips ALL proper ash tree use spellings and only, sometimes, uses the expanded ae double characters instead
-
When you can't find somcthing obivous (with big words), speel it incorectly for more reults.
-
Another comparators.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Another comparators.
That is a seriously old word... I mean electrical engineering has been using it since the early 1900's not to mention the uses for it prior to that. Odd that the Chrome dictionary doesn't have it.
I find it annoying when the English spelling is right and the American spelling isn't.
-
It seems to be my wont in life to be forever using archaic word forms.
-
Hypervisor and the plural hypervisors.
-
How about miscommunicating.
-
Should you send your list to Google?
