Exploring VitalPBX
-
First impression, beyond the install being ridiculously easy, is that the resource usage is really light. This is a system with multiple people on the interface, and multiple extensions set up:
# free -m total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 991 406 134 13 450 419 Swap: 2047 0 2047 -
Second impression, the interface is great. It's attractive, modern, looks professional, and is super responsive. Not what I am used to on a PBX at all. Very impressive. It's easy to find what you need, and everything looks good and gets you where you need to go really quickly. It feels like working on VitalPBX will be much more efficient than on some other systems because it just seems very fast and intuitive. Also the interface is responsive, I tried it on my phone and it worked quite well.
-
The Extensions Screen:
-
They have a @Skyetel setup guide, too. https://vitalpbx.org/en/skyetel-sip-trunk-with-vitalpbx/
-
Setting up a Skyetel trunk was quick and easy. Worked right away. One thing to know, though, the VitalPBX instructions say to use the +1XXXXXXXXXX pattern when it needs to be 1XXXXXXXXXX on the Inbound Route DID.
-
One thing that I like is that VitalPBX goes straight to Asterisk 16.
-
I've not played with it yet, but it looks like the Hot Desking feature on VitalPBX is really slick! It looks crazy impressive.
-
@scottalanmiller is there any kind of endpoint manager?
-
Centos Latest 7 ? like what version are you running , i tend to use rolling ISO:
1902-01.iso
https://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/?C=M;O=DAlso what is the Asterisk Version ?
-
@scottalanmiller Any reason why you're changing from FreePBX? Is it because of all the recent changes at Sangoma? Or just want to try something new?
-
@scottalanmiller I've just started testing with FusionPBX as well. Totally different animal, since the backend is FreeSwitch, but it is very nice so far.
-
@syko24 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller is there any kind of endpoint manager?
Found the answer, yes it does have an endpoint manager.
-
Hm. Can't seem to get nginx working with it for web access to demo. Ports 80/443 are open and it's still 502'ing.
-
@fuznutz04 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller Any reason why you're changing from FreePBX? Is it because of all the recent changes at Sangoma? Or just want to try something new?
He always plays with the newest toys, if for no other reason than to learn them.
-
@Dashrender said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@fuznutz04 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller Any reason why you're changing from FreePBX? Is it because of all the recent changes at Sangoma? Or just want to try something new?
He always plays with the newest toys, if for no other reason than to learn them.
Same for me. I would never roll something like this into productoin at a cleint anytime soon. I need to learn it first.. But me learning it first would be me posting shit here like @scottalanmiller is.
-
@fuznutz04 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller Any reason why you're changing from FreePBX? Is it because of all the recent changes at Sangoma? Or just want to try something new?
Learning for one. Not really concerned with the changes at Sangoma, Sangoma is a fine company from my experiences with them and the people that they are losing weren't a team I'm very concerned about. Any risks from Sangoma would be to Asterisk and that would impact VitalPBX, Wazo, and others, as well.
This was kind of "just the right" combination of discussions a few weeks ago where we had some phone people talk to us about VitalPBX and then the discussion with the FreePBX founder a few days ago really put it into my head. We've always known that the FreePBX layer on top of Asterisk was super amateur and kludgy, but it was the natural progression from TrixBox and Elastix over the years and, at the time, was far and away where we would want to have been. But they really were good almost entirely because they were the only game in town, not because it was "good" by any absolute standard. The PBX distro was a collection of other packages that are all solid and great, but the FreePBX layer on top was pretty rough; but we could ignore that as it is just the administration interface for the most part. So we never worried about it and test other products from time to time and there are some good ones, but nothing has been so dramatic to make us really want to evaluate for switching.
VitalPBX is a bit unique in that they basically took an identical approach that FreePBX did - same overall component selection, approach, design, etc. But its built by professional developers who know what they are doing it would seem. The design is cohesive, responsive (both in the web terminology and the IT one), competent, etc. Unlike Wazo which requires relearning and thinking differently about your PBX, VitalPBX is a "drop in replacement" for FreePBX. Since FreePBX does exactly what we want, VitalPBX seems to do exactly what we want - but does it well (so far.)
So VitalPBX is a different situation than everything we've seen before. It's got a long standing (if small) company behind it. It's exactly the product we wished that we would have had for all these years. It fits our internal and customer use profiles perfectly. And it requires essentially no retraining so our engineers using FreePBX can just look at VitalPBX and run with it. I was literally more effective on VitalPBX in like ten minutes just because it's so intuitive and the platform moves that much faster
-
@syko24 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller is there any kind of endpoint manager?
Sure does. All included, no "paid for" add on.
-
@Emad-R said in Exploring VitalPBX:
Centos Latest 7 ? like what version are you running
Totally up to date.
-
@Emad-R said in Exploring VitalPBX:
Centos Latest 7 ? like what version are you running , i tend to use rolling ISO:
1902-01.iso
https://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/?C=M;O=DAlso what is the Asterisk Version ?
16.3.0 - you can see it in the first screen shot in the bottom right.
-
@fuznutz04 said in Exploring VitalPBX:
@scottalanmiller I've just started testing with FusionPBX as well. Totally different animal, since the backend is FreeSwitch, but it is very nice so far.
FusionPBX should be ideal if you want to host multi-tenant. That's its bread and butter and easily is the best for that. VitalPBX will do multi-tenant but requires a commercial component for that and its simply not the core use case (and not one we are interested in, so we don't care.) We are a one tenant operator today whether internally or for customers. So while we find that use case very interesting and important, it just doesn't come up for us (yet.)
We need a really solid "go to" single tenant system. And so far, this is the best I've put my hands on.
