Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service
-
@scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@travisdh1 said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@quixoticjustin said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@travisdh1 said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Violating a websites TOS is a felony...
Definitely not a felony. At most it is a civil suit.
If you really think you do nothing wrong according to the police/feds, feel free to use this new service.
How does that relate? That's a totally different thing. That's violating his ISP, not a web site.
Well shoot, that's not how I remember the reporting on the story.
-
@travisdh1 said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@travisdh1 said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@quixoticjustin said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@travisdh1 said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Violating a websites TOS is a felony...
Definitely not a felony. At most it is a civil suit.
If you really think you do nothing wrong according to the police/feds, feel free to use this new service.
How does that relate? That's a totally different thing. That's violating his ISP, not a web site.
Well shoot, that's not how I remember the reporting on the story.
It matters a bit. Consumers using public web sites are generally pretty safe. You still need to follow the TOS, but the ability to prosecute is minimal.
-
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
Listen to and absorb the message that KRS-One is laid out in 1993. More true now than ever.
-
@rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
That is why I turn my phone off whenever I get pulled over so it requires a password to unlock instead of my fingerprint. No need to give them any information that is not required by law.
-
@brianlittlejohn said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
That is why I turn my phone off whenever I get pulled over so it requires a password to unlock instead of my fingerprint. No need to give them any information that is not required by law.
Someone else is as familiar with that law as myself I see...
-
@rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
And remember, the cops are above the law. Sure the state can go after them if it wants to but as a citizen you have no recourse. So law enforcement agencies are free to lie about their website policies and theree is nothing you can do if they break them. A statement from law enforcement that they won't break the law means nothing. You literally can't trust them, there is no basis for trust.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
And remember, the cops are above the law. Sure the state can go after them if it wants to but as a citizen you have no recourse. So law enforcement agencies are free to lie about their website policies and theree is nothing you can do if they break them. A statement from law enforcement that they won't break the law means nothing. You literally can't trust them, there is no basis for trust.
Law Enforcement also operates on the notion that "Everyone is guilty until they are proven innocent." Going against many of the tenants of how our justice system is supposed to function. It really brings in an "Us vs Them" mentality that is kind of scary.
-
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
-
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
No, that's not the same thing.
-
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
No, that's not the same thing.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
-
@jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
No, that's not the same thing.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.
-
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
No, that's not the same thing.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.
How is adding a back door to all encryption everywhere (no choice given) relate to a hypothetical possibility of an optional open DNS protection service logging which dns names you need resolved to IP addresses?
Apples and oranges there...
-
@scottalanmiller said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@rojoloco said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
Got Damn.... this whole thread needs to realize that the police are always out to get anything they can on anyone, anytime. Don't play into their game. Don't feed the beast.
And remember, the cops are above the law. Sure the state can go after them if it wants to but as a citizen you have no recourse. So law enforcement agencies are free to lie about their website policies and theree is nothing you can do if they break them. A statement from law enforcement that they won't break the law means nothing. You literally can't trust them, there is no basis for trust.
Their job is lying in order to get people to incriminate themselves.
-
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@jaredbusch said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@coliver said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
And for those who are criminals... good, I'm glad it was recorded to help put them away!
I guess you're for government and law enforcement agents putting a backdoor into encryption tools to ensure "the good guys" can unlock them?
No, that's not the same thing.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I'm with @JaredBusch I don't see how the two are different.
How is adding a back door to all encryption everywhere (no choice given) relate to a hypothetical possibility of an optional open DNS protection service logging which dns names you need resolved to IP addresses?
Apples and oranges there...
It's really about surveillance. Do you subscribe to them surveying you when you have options that are less likely to allow them to do so?
-
I wonder how many of the agencies that used ComputerCop are behind this new scheme?
-
I stopped testing Quad9 on my computer. I've been having some weird issues with GitLab errors on the website. As soon as I plugged in Google's DNS, it worked.
But then again, a refresh or two got it working again while I was still using Quad9.
I'll update later to report if any issue like that returns now that I'm using Google on my computer.
-
@tim_g said in Quad9 DNS Malicious Domain Blocking Service:
I stopped testing Quad9 on my computer. I've been having some weird issues with GitLab errors on the website. As soon as I plugged in Google's DNS, it worked.
But then again, a refresh or two got it working again while I was still using Quad9.
I'll update later to report if any issue like that returns now that I'm using Google on my computer.
Nope, was not Quad9 related.
I think it's some kind of timeout I never noticed before or GitLab is having issues.
