ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite @wrx7m
      last edited by

      @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      GLPI ITSM 9.4.0
      https://glpi-project.org/glpi-9-4-0/

      I used GLPI before switching to Spiceworks at my last job. From what I remember, it wasn't terrible... I'll have to give this one another go.

      I've also used it before switching to Snipe-IT mainly because of the check-in/check-out feature.

      Currently using snipe-it. It is great. The one thing spiceworks has is the automated scanning. This mostly works, but also can cause network issues and is kind of clunky. I actually use both, but only use sw to fill in certain gaps.

      I haven't used them for a long time now but, Fusion Inventory or OCS can also automatically scan to and then add the info to GLPI. If I remember correctly they require installing an agent to the computers for them to work.

      wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • wrx7mW
        wrx7m @black3dynamite
        last edited by

        @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        GLPI

        I don't mind having an agent. SW uses agents for remote systems. PDQ Inventory does too, or will. I am using PDQ deploy and would like to have the integration that comes with the inventory aspect.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @wrx7m
          last edited by

          @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

          @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

          GLPI

          I don't mind having an agent. SW uses agents for remote systems. PDQ Inventory does too, or will. I am using PDQ deploy and would like to have the integration that comes with the inventory aspect.

          I prefer agents. Slightly more work overall, but consistent results and no weird troubleshooting.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.

            dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dafyreD
              dafyre @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.

              I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.

              dbeatoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite
                last edited by

                https://cockpit-project.org/blog/cockpit-187.html

                b66ec98c-4a3f-43fd-be79-427ca2ee758b-image.png

                80312809-3eb5-4f6e-87ab-21ac0b9e7f56-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dbeatoD
                  dbeato @dafyre
                  last edited by

                  @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.

                  I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.

                  For the server but for the computer it is more intensive... however I do like when something scans the network for me instead of an agent. There were certain devices added that sometimes do not get agents and so I like that part when there is a networks scan.

                  dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • dafyreD
                    dafyre @dbeato
                    last edited by

                    @dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.

                    I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.

                    For the server but for the computer it is more intensive... however I do like when something scans the network for me instead of an agent. There were certain devices added that sometimes do not get agents and so I like that part when there is a networks scan.

                    Being able to do both is usually a good approach, IMO. When you scan the network, check for an agent. If the agent is found, trigger an inventory update. If the agent ain't found, try to inventory it yourself, or at least alert somebody to put the agent on.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • dbeatoD
                      dbeato
                      last edited by

                      Zimbra 8.8.11 and 8.7.11 Patches
                      https://blog.zimbra.com/2019/02/new-zimbra-patches-8-8-11-patch-2-and-8-8-10-patch-6-and-8-7-11-patch-8/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.

                        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • black3dynamiteB
                          black3dynamite @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.

                          I can’t wait for the release.

                          Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?

                          DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @black3dynamite
                            last edited by

                            @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.

                            I can’t wait for the release.

                            Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?

                            I only run stable.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DustinB3403D
                              DustinB3403 @black3dynamite
                              last edited by

                              @black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.

                              I can’t wait for the release.

                              Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?

                              The one feature that will be extremely useful to me is the custom asset report addition for the "fully depreciation" value. As it is now, we're guestimating when an asset is due for upgrade based on an Excel spreadsheet.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • nadnerBN
                                nadnerB
                                last edited by

                                Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
                                https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.html

                                If you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @nadnerB
                                  last edited by

                                  @nadnerB said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
                                  https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.html

                                  If you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.

                                  Nothing wrong with not activating. Not aware of the EULA requiring that. They aren't suggesting that it not be licensed, just not activated. Very different things.

                                  ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • ObsolesceO
                                    Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by Obsolesce

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @nadnerB said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
                                    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.html

                                    If you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.

                                    Nothing wrong with not activating. Not aware of the EULA requiring that. They aren't suggesting that it not be licensed, just not activated. Very different things.

                                    It does require activation:

                                    d0e306a7-f7af-49ae-b587-f62d2151da3e-image.png

                                    c25d5265-4e0e-4bbc-886b-d1f17860361a-image.png

                                    So if you are not properly licensed AND activated, you are not authorized to use the software (Windows 10).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      Yeah Tom's Hardware people are just endorsing theft of software from Microsoft. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you're allowed too.

                                      We've discussed this same thing here on ML. Like with IT Administrators who want to setup 3 Installations of Windows Server X using their Standard license.

                                      You're allowed 2 installations, and that is all. Either 1 to the bare metal and 1 VM on the same hardware. Or 2 installations as VMs on the same hardware.

                                      This is nothing different besides the fact that they're stating the licensing "doesn't apply because we haven't been stopped for all of this time".

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice vulnerable to same bug; only one is fixed

                                        LibreOffice, an open source clone of Microsoft Office, has patched a bug that allowed attackers to execute commands of their choosing on vulnerable computers. A similar flaw in Apache OpenOffice remains unfixed.

                                        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • mlnewsM
                                          mlnews
                                          last edited by

                                          Samsung’s new Tab S5e is super thin, supports Bixby, and costs just $399

                                          The more affordable tablet takes some notes from the premium Tab S4.

                                          The high-end nature of the Tab S5e comes in its design. The all-metal unibody is the thinnest and lightest of any Samsung tablet, weighing about 14 ounces and measuring 5.5mm thick. Samsung didn't skimp too much on the display, either, sticking a 10.5-inch, 2560×1600 AMOLED panel with a 16:10 aspect ratio on the tablet. It's also the first Samsung tablet with Bixby built in, allowing users to call on the voice assistant to answer questions, control connected SmartThings devices, and more.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DustinB3403D
                                            DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            Digital exchange loses $137 million as founder takes passwords to the grave

                                            A cryptocurrency exchange in Canada has lost control of at least $137 million of its customers’ assets following the sudden death of its founder, who was the only person known to have access to the offline wallet that stored the digital coins. British Columbia-based QuadrigaCX is unable to access most or all of another $53 million because it’s tied up in disputes with third parties.

                                            Reid CooperR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 355
                                            • 356
                                            • 357
                                            • 358
                                            • 359
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 357 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post