Miscellaneous Tech News
-
@obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Microsoft Announce Enhanced Version of Ubuntu 18.04 for Hyper-V
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/09/hyper-v-ubuntu-1804-windows-integrationYeah that's great for devs or others wanting to run it as a VM on their Win10 desktop.
But it's not something I'd ever run as a server on Hyper-V Server.
Why not? I've run Ubuntu on Hyper-V and had no trouble with it. It's been a while though.
Because you'd want Ubuntu Server instead, not a Desktop OS, if you go the Ubuntu route.
But I wanted a desktop OS.... /pout. lol.
-
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Microsoft Announce Enhanced Version of Ubuntu 18.04 for Hyper-V
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/09/hyper-v-ubuntu-1804-windows-integrationYeah that's great for devs or others wanting to run it as a VM on their Win10 desktop.
But it's not something I'd ever run as a server on Hyper-V Server.
Why not? I've run Ubuntu on Hyper-V and had no trouble with it. It's been a while though.
I agree, other than Ubuntu not being my favourite distro for them to have done this with, seems like great stuff to me.
VDI with Ubuntu. I'm literally doing VDI with Fedora while I'm writing this. So I certainly see the value. I'm just doing Fedora on KVM, but the ideas are the same.
-
@obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Microsoft Announce Enhanced Version of Ubuntu 18.04 for Hyper-V
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/09/hyper-v-ubuntu-1804-windows-integrationYeah that's great for devs or others wanting to run it as a VM on their Win10 desktop.
But it's not something I'd ever run as a server on Hyper-V Server.
Why not? I've run Ubuntu on Hyper-V and had no trouble with it. It's been a while though.
Because you'd want Ubuntu Server instead, not a Desktop OS, if you go the Ubuntu route.
VDI?
-
Rocket and NextCloud Integration Announced!
@jospoortvliet you should talk to your counterpart at Rocket.chat and get them in here, too. Loads of Rocket.Chat users in this community, almost as many as NextCloud.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Rocket and NextCloud Integration Announced!
@jospoortvliet you should talk to your counterpart at Rocket.chat and get them in here, too. Loads of Rocket.Chat users in this community, almost as many as NextCloud.
Loads
That is quite a stretch. There is you and a couple others. no one else.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Not a fan of this, except for very small sites where I cannot run something like a Pi-Hole easily.
-
-
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Not a fan of this, except for very small sites where I cannot run something like a Pi-Hole easily.
Pretty good for just blocking one or two domains you want to go away. Not good as a general solution for ad blocking. But if you just want to knock out one or two that cause problems for you, it's decent.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Does it consume any resources on the router?
Some, not many. Unless the list is huge.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Does it consume any resources on the router?
Of course it does. It has to perform look ups for all DNS requests. But they are local look ups, so they are fast, and happens before it bothers to go to the dns forwarding server. I like
dnsmasqfunctionality.What I don't like is the scripting that happens during the 5am cron job.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Not a fan of this, except for very small sites where I cannot run something like a Pi-Hole easily.
Pretty good for just blocking one or two domains you want to go away. Not good as a general solution for ad blocking. But if you just want to knock out one or two that cause problems for you, it's decent.
For any non AD based site, the router is already the DNS server for the clients, and I can create a static host mapping for any URL I want to kill.
The biggest thing to know, that the article does a good job of stating is that you need to disable DHCP assigned DNS from the WAN.
Obviously, if you have a static WAN, this is not needed.# eth0 is the default WAN port on all modern wizard configs. set interfaces ethernet eth0 dhcp-options name-server no-updateThere have been posts and posts about this for years on the UBNT forums.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
But if you just want to knock out one or two that cause problems for you, it's decent.
@scottalanmiller Assuming the router is the DNS source, this accomplishes the same task for a simple 1 off.
set system static-host-mapping host-name www3.doubleclick.net inet 0.0.0.0 -
@scottalanmiller Good article
-
-
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
That is fantastic news. We were using both of those in parallel. Having them integrated would be amazing.
-
For @scottalanmiller
-
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
https://www.cloudberrylab.com/blog/introducing-cloudberry-backup-2-5-1-for-macos-linux
That's excellent!
