Home Lab Hypervisor?
-
@FATeknollogee said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@stacksofplates said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Two KVM servers on CentOS 7.
You need 2x CentOS 7 vm's to run oVirt?
I'm not running oVirt. Just bare CentOS 7 with KVM.
One host has an NFS share because it has bigger disks. The other has more RAM so it has most of the VMs running.
I can transfer them between the hosts but I don't usually do that.
-
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
-
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
Restoronix are big fans of Hyper-V
-
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
This is very correct approach IMHO.
-
@restoronix said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
Restoronix are big fans of Hyper-V
Well that is because you are baking in Veeam.
-
@JaredBusch said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@restoronix said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
Restoronix are big fans of Hyper-V
Well that is because you are baking in Veeam.
Hyper-V is a great hypervisor, too... there are few reasons not to use it, and most of those reasons have nothing to do with Hyper-V itself.
-
@Tim_G said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@JaredBusch said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@restoronix said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
Restoronix are big fans of Hyper-V
Well that is because you are baking in Veeam.
Hyper-V is a great hypervisor, too... there are few reasons not to use it, and most of those reasons have nothing to do with Hyper-V itself.
I'm curious, what would be your reasons not to use it?
-
@Tim_G said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@JaredBusch said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@restoronix said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Hyper-V. It's what I have been rolling for production so it only makes sense to have it in my lab so I can test stuff.
Restoronix are big fans of Hyper-V
Well that is because you are baking in Veeam.
Hyper-V is a great hypervisor, too... there are few reasons not to use it, and most of those reasons have nothing to do with Hyper-V itself.
I am not arguing that, and it is in fact the hypervisor I use in production at clients.
But you cannot consider a vendor such as @restoronix saying they are big fans of Hyper-V as an authority because they have a heavy bias to to it due to their product.
Technically, they only have Veeam baked into to their product, and thus they can work with any hypervisor that Veeam can work with. But as we all know, that is currently limited to VMWare and Hyper-V.
Add in the common knowledge that VMWare does belong in the typically SMB unless they have enough need to warrant Essentials Plus, and that tells you (well me) that Restoronix is going to heavily target the Hyper-V market.
-
Any of you Hyper-V guys tried this at home? https://xenappblog.com/2017/setup-nano-server-as-nas-for-home-lab/
I set one up 3 days ago, was pretty easy & painless.
I then fired up a second instance & imported it to XenServer, it was almost too easy... -
@FATeknollogee said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Any of you Hyper-V guys tried this at home? https://xenappblog.com/2017/setup-nano-server-as-nas-for-home-lab/
I set one up 3 days ago, was pretty easy & painless.
I then fired up a second instance & imported it to XenServer, it was almost too easy...Do I understand it correctly that Nano Server uses the same license as standard server? (so Nano consumes the same license that a standard server would?)
-
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Do I understand it correctly that Nano Server uses the same license as standard server? (so Nano consumes the same license that a standard server would?)
Looks like SA is required
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/cloud-platform/windows-server-pricing -
@FATeknollogee said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Do I understand it correctly that Nano Server uses the same license as standard server? (so Nano consumes the same license that a standard server would?)
Looks like SA is required
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/cloud-platform/windows-server-pricingPretty clear cut..
-
@FATeknollogee said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@Mike-Davis said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
Do I understand it correctly that Nano Server uses the same license as standard server? (so Nano consumes the same license that a standard server would?)
Looks like SA is required
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/cloud-platform/windows-server-pricingYup
-
Also, based on that MSRP, you switch to Datacenter on VM #13.
6155 / 882 = 6.98
So the biggest whole number there is 6 licenses.
6 licenses = 12 Windows Server VMs
-
@JaredBusch I did the math on that about a year ago, and, if I recall 13 was the magic number then.
-
@EddieJennings said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@JaredBusch I did the math on that about a year ago, and, if I recall 13 was the magic number then.
MSRP probably has not changed.
-
@EddieJennings said in Home Lab Hypervisor?:
@JaredBusch I did the math on that about a year ago, and, if I recall 13 was the magic number then.
Correct. For Datacenter over Standard.
-
Hyper-V 2102 R2 and 2016 for most everything. I have a host with ESXi and XenServer but they are turned off.
