Pi-hole dumps on Fedora
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
No, it's not a different issue, it's exactly the same issue. Being committed means just that.
F33 was released in October and now it's March. In less than 2 months F34 will be released.
If they really were committed to support Fedora, F33 would have been officially supported months ago. -
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
I don't know if it's actually better since we don't run Ubuntu, but the concept is better.
That's also why there is an LTS release of the linux kernel. -
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
just no.
-
@stacksofplates just no. @JaredBusch prefers the hard way.
-
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates just no. @JaredBusch prefers the hard way.
Don't put words in my mouth.
-
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward. It sounded harsh, I didn't mean it to sound that way. You could just tell the container to use the existing directories and not have to worry about anything.
-
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward.
That gets into different issues since Fedora went with podman. I haven't done much tinkering with it yet to see how compatible things are.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward.
That gets into different issues since Fedora went with podman. I haven't done much tinkering with it yet to see how compatible things are.
It's a drop in replacement. It doesn't use the Docker socket so you can't use things like docker-compose, but I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing. Any normal tasks should be the same. There's people who have said they aliased podman to docker and never noticed a difference.
