ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Wrong Caller ID

    IT Discussion
    4
    17
    565
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      krzykat @JasGot
      last edited by

      @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        JasGot @krzykat
        last edited by JasGot

        @krzykat said in Wrong Caller ID:

        @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

        For the Caller ID Editor.

        Without the "1" They accept it, tell you it has processed, then do nothing with it......

        With the "1", they accept it, tell you it has processed, then they actually submit it to the Caller ID database in the sky (or wherever it is) 🙂

        SkyetelS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • SkyetelS
          Skyetel @JasGot
          last edited by

          @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

          @krzykat said in Wrong Caller ID:

          @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

          For the Caller ID Editor.

          Without the "1" They accept it, tell you it has processed, then do nothing with it......

          With the "1", they accept it, tell you it has processed, then they actually submit it to the Caller ID database in the sky (or wherever it is) 🙂

          This might be a bug. I’ll have it checked out.

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JasGot @Skyetel
            last edited by

            @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

            @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

            @krzykat said in Wrong Caller ID:

            @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

            For the Caller ID Editor.

            Without the "1" They accept it, tell you it has processed, then do nothing with it......

            With the "1", they accept it, tell you it has processed, then they actually submit it to the Caller ID database in the sky (or wherever it is) 🙂

            This might be a bug. I’ll have it checked out.

            Or, and better, do validation on the submission and require 11 digits! (Always better to validate user input....)

            SkyetelS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • SkyetelS
              Skyetel @JasGot
              last edited by

              @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

              @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

              @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

              @krzykat said in Wrong Caller ID:

              @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

              For the Caller ID Editor.

              Without the "1" They accept it, tell you it has processed, then do nothing with it......

              With the "1", they accept it, tell you it has processed, then they actually submit it to the Caller ID database in the sky (or wherever it is) 🙂

              This might be a bug. I’ll have it checked out.

              Or, and better, do validation on the submission and require 11 digits! (Always better to validate user input....)

              We cant validate a submission like we can elsewhere because the CID updated is not a real time process. That’s why (as Jared noted) it can take a couple of days for it to update. These updates sit in a queue and get updated when the CID gods are in a good mood.

              We tweaked our UI to allow 10 digit entries based on feedback here and I suspect that when we did that, the thing that converts the entry into E.164 got mixed up. The CID stuff is crazy arcane...

              CID entries can also get rejected If the LIDB thinks their data is more accurate than ours. We don’t get any feedback about that (the log will just show it as rejected, often without a reason, and we have to open a ticket to dispute the rejection.)

              And of course, as Jared mentioned, if the party you are calling caches their records for a long time (or never updates them - something that’s super common) then there’s nothing we can do.

              So yea, that tool hides a lot and generates a lot of support tickets for us. We try to make what is an absurdly complicated process easy, but by doing so we’re opening the door to bugs like this. Welcome to telecom! lol

              JaredBuschJ J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @Skyetel
                last edited by

                @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

                We tweaked our UI to allow 10 digit entries based on feedback here

                #whistlesnonchalantly

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  JasGot @Skyetel
                  last edited by

                  @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

                  We cant validate a submission like we can elsewhere because the CID updated is not a real time process.

                  I was talking about the submission form at Skyetel. If you know it's best to get an 11 digit field value for the number, then validate it at the submission form. It would be silly to validate when you submit it to the CID gods when you already know what you should be getting, (even before submitting up stream).

                  SkyetelS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • SkyetelS
                    Skyetel @JasGot
                    last edited by

                    @JasGot Ah, yea, that’s what I’m going to check out tomorrow 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • SkyetelS
                      Skyetel @JasGot
                      last edited by

                      @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

                      @krzykat said in Wrong Caller ID:

                      @JasGot What are you referencing? The DIP at Skyetel or ?

                      For the Caller ID Editor.

                      Without the "1" They accept it, tell you it has processed, then do nothing with it......

                      With the "1", they accept it, tell you it has processed, then they actually submit it to the Caller ID database in the sky (or wherever it is) 🙂

                      Looks like this isn't a bug, but without more details we can't troubleshoot further.

                      Would you please open a support ticket so we can ask for PII?

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        JasGot @Skyetel
                        last edited by

                        @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

                        Would you please open a support ticket so we can ask for PII?

                        Done:
                        #82411

                        SkyetelS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • SkyetelS
                          Skyetel @JasGot
                          last edited by

                          @JasGot said in Wrong Caller ID:

                          @Skyetel said in Wrong Caller ID:

                          Would you please open a support ticket so we can ask for PII?

                          Done:
                          #82411

                          Great, thanks. We've already replied 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • SkyetelS
                            Skyetel
                            last edited by

                            I wanted to make sure I followed up and let you all know that we confirmed that there was no bug. There was a propagation delay that impacted @JasGot which caused it to appear that the 10 digit vs 11 digit input mattered.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1 / 1
                            • First post
                              Last post