ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Which Nas OS?

    IT Discussion
    13
    69
    4.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      krisleslie @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller Hey Scotty! Yes, I know you meant the NAS OS (that we can install) vs Vendor + Hardware/Software/Support Stack. Gotcha we on same page!

      I honestly wish Synology would make a Linux distro 🙂 their stuff is sexy can't lie. But I think what I was referring to is really the "niche" market of people doing Synology OS (the open-source version) that is basically the same thing as loading FreeNAS. I haven't done it but was thinking of tinkering with it at home for sh*ts & giggles. Same with FreeNAS. But at work I started off with Synology, and honestly after all the learning and listening from you Scott over the years, it's like I kinda don't even need Synology I would rather just have another server with a proper virtualization stack. The only thing I'm missing out on is really the remote backup features from XCP-NG. I would probably like to send a feature request for them to maybe consider using like Amazon or Azure as a backup point. But I recall MSP360 can do the heavy lifting.

      scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @jmoore
        last edited by

        @jmoore said in Which Nas OS?:

        Wish I could find a solid Solaris fork that was still being developed.

        I mean, Illumos has been idle for seven hours now.

        jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @krisleslie
          last edited by

          @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

          But I think what I was referring to is really the "niche" market of people doing Synology OS (the open-source version) that is basically the same thing as loading FreeNAS.

          They'd fall into the same boat. A system that depends on support, whose function is support, layered onto something else. Synology is a great product. Remove the support and it's a nice looking, but worthless GUI layer.

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • jmooreJ
            jmoore @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

            @jmoore said in Which Nas OS?:

            Wish I could find a solid Solaris fork that was still being developed.

            I mean, Illumos has been idle for seven hours now.

            Ok I am going to try it with OmniOS.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @jmoore
              last edited by

              @jmoore said in Which Nas OS?:

              @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

              @jmoore said in Which Nas OS?:

              Wish I could find a solid Solaris fork that was still being developed.

              I mean, Illumos has been idle for seven hours now.

              Ok I am going to try it with OmniOS.

              But they've been idle THREE DAYS, lol 😉

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @krisleslie
                last edited by

                @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

                The only thing I'm missing out on is really the remote backup features from XCP-NG.

                Proxmox has backups built in, too.

                black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • black3dynamiteB
                  black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

                  @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

                  The only thing I'm missing out on is really the remote backup features from XCP-NG.

                  Proxmox has backups built in, too.

                  Although its only full backups.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                    last edited by

                    @black3dynamite said in Which Nas OS?:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

                    @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

                    The only thing I'm missing out on is really the remote backup features from XCP-NG.

                    Proxmox has backups built in, too.

                    Although its only full backups.

                    True. But add compression and dedupe and it's only so bad.

                    black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • black3dynamiteB
                      black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

                      @black3dynamite said in Which Nas OS?:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Which Nas OS?:

                      @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

                      The only thing I'm missing out on is really the remote backup features from XCP-NG.

                      Proxmox has backups built in, too.

                      Although its only full backups.

                      True. But add compression and dedupe and it's only so bad.

                      So far I'm only using the backup for small containers and VMs.

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        krisleslie @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller you are 100% correct I would be back in the same issue. I actually can say I lived that life. When my nas went through a phase it wasn't supported and didn't get updates, their support sent me to the wolves. I eventually got it to work after 1-2 years after they pushed a firmware update unexpectedly. That left me feeling like yea, I would rather just deal with a server, vm and storage from Window. If something breaks, to some degree I can just spin up another vm and continue working. I don't have a 2nd Synology nas so that in itself is a point of failure.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          krisleslie @black3dynamite
                          last edited by krisleslie

                          @black3dynamite yea I'm more intune with wanting to have the ability to push it to Amazon or Azure or some other cloud vendor. Have to tip my hat, Synology does it out the box.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @krisleslie
                            last edited by

                            @krisleslie said in Which Nas OS?:

                            I don't have a 2nd Synology nas so that in itself is a point of failure.

                            Sure, but at least you can go to the store and get another.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • K
                              krisleslie
                              last edited by

                              Valid point

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 3
                              • 4
                              • 4 / 4
                              • First post
                                Last post