ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all

    IT Discussion
    edgerouter edgerouter 4 colocation it support vpn zerotier
    7
    82
    5.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
      last edited by

      Has anyone installed ZT on an ER?
      https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-edgerouter-p2/

      Aaron StuderA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        These options pretty much are static, it's been the same since colo began. You can get leased lines between the sites, you can use VPN to mimic leased lines, or you can not use LAN-based models and just connect over the Internet on an machine to machine, app to app basis.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • Aaron StuderA
          Aaron Studer @FATeknollogee
          last edited by

          @FATeknollogee

          https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dafyreD
            dafyre
            last edited by

            I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

            I connect them all via ZeroTier.

            FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @Aaron Studer
              last edited by

              @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

              @FATeknollogee

              https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

              My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

              I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @FATeknollogee

                https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                WTF?

                FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FATeknollogeeF
                  FATeknollogee @dafyre
                  last edited by

                  @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                  I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                  I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                  How's the speeds between sites?

                  dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @dafyre
                    last edited by

                    @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                    I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                    I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                    This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site
                    How has it worked out so far?

                    dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • 1
                      1337 @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @FATeknollogee

                      https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                      My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                      I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                      WTF?

                      FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                      You smokin?

                      "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                      You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                      DashrenderD JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @1337
                        last edited by

                        @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @FATeknollogee

                        https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                        My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                        I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                        WTF?

                        FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                        You smokin?

                        "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                        You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                        What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @1337
                          last edited by

                          @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @FATeknollogee

                          https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                          My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                          I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                          WTF?

                          FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                          You smokin?

                          Totally.

                          "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                          You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                          But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said.

                          FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FATeknollogeeF
                            FATeknollogee @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @FATeknollogee

                            https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                            My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                            I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                            WTF?

                            FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                            You smokin?

                            "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                            You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                            What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                            Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FATeknollogeeF
                              FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @FATeknollogee

                              https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                              My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                              I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                              WTF?

                              FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                              You smokin?

                              Totally.

                              "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                              You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                              But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said.

                              Correct, multiple sites, multiple things.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                                last edited by

                                @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @FATeknollogee

                                https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                WTF?

                                FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                You smokin?

                                "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                FATeknollogeeF DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • FATeknollogeeF
                                  FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @FATeknollogee

                                  https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                  My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                  I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                  WTF?

                                  FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                  You smokin?

                                  "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                  You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                  What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                  Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                  We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                  Did you use Route based VPN?
                                  https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                                    last edited by

                                    @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @FATeknollogee

                                    https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                    My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                    I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                    WTF?

                                    FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                    You smokin?

                                    "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                    You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                    What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                    Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                    We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                    Did you use Route based VPN?
                                    https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                                    I've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods.

                                    FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • FATeknollogeeF
                                      FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                                      last edited by

                                      @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @FATeknollogee

                                      https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                      My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                      I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                      WTF?

                                      FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                      You smokin?

                                      "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                      You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                      What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                      Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                      We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                      Did you use Route based VPN?
                                      https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                                      I've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods.

                                      Ease of setup/ability to add more sites, one method vs the other?

                                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dafyreD
                                        dafyre @FATeknollogee
                                        last edited by

                                        @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                                        I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                                        How's the speeds between sites?

                                        Speeds were good. I don't remember what they were, but I transferred 1TB of stuff over ZT without any issues.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @FATeknollogee
                                          last edited by

                                          @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                          @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                          I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                                          I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                                          This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site
                                          How has it worked out so far?

                                          Yeah, that's me, and it's been great. I haven't had any problems with it at all.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            @FATeknollogee

                                            https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                            My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                            I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                            WTF?

                                            FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                            You smokin?

                                            "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                            You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                            What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                            Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                            We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                            Which is what i was mentioning up top.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 1 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post