Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all
- 
 
- 
 I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks. I connect them all via ZeroTier. 
- 
 @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. 
- 
 @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks. I connect them all via ZeroTier. How's the speeds between sites? 
- 
 @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks. I connect them all via ZeroTier. This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site 
 How has it worked out so far?
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."
- 
 @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. 
- 
 @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? Totally. "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) 
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? Totally. "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said. Correct, multiple sites, multiple things. 
- 
 @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. 
- 
 @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. Did you use Route based VPN? 
 https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN
- 
 @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. Did you use Route based VPN? 
 https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPNI've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods. 
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. Did you use Route based VPN? 
 https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPNI've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods. Ease of setup/ability to add more sites, one method vs the other? 
- 
 @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks. I connect them all via ZeroTier. How's the speeds between sites? Speeds were good. I don't remember what they were, but I transferred 1TB of stuff over ZT without any issues. 
- 
 @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks. I connect them all via ZeroTier. This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site 
 How has it worked out so far?Yeah, that's me, and it's been great. I haven't had any problems with it at all. 
- 
 @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. Which is what i was mentioning up top. 
- 
 @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices? I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups. WTF? FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns. You smokin? "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc). 
 You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear. Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone) We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec. Did you use Route based VPN? 
 https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPNI've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods. Ease of setup/ability to add more sites, one method vs the other? Well, once you have ZT setup, adding another site is likely the easiest. You just add ZT on a new ER, join the mesh and you're done. With site to site VPN, you'd have to build the tunnel on both ER's (the co-lo and the new site). Not that this is hard, just possible a tiny more amount of work. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all: Well, once you have ZT setup, adding another site is likely the easiest. You just add ZT on a new ER, join the mesh and you're done. Who has done this ZT on ER install? 
 The previous blog post seems to imply heavy/high CPU usage, wondering how this would affect performance?




