ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster

    IT Discussion
    cluster virtualization virtual storage appliance ipod home lab shared storage
    9
    80
    6.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
      last edited by

      @Obsolesce said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

      @Pete-S said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

      Maybe a dumb question, but was it is that makes it hyperconverged solution compared to "just a bunch of hypervisors" with local storage that are managed together?

      Is it vSAN (or equivalent)?

      Hyperconverged just means everything is in the same box: storage, compute, network... Vsan has nothing to do with the name.

      If you have a single node, that's true. With more than one node, it needs the extra terminology of the storage and management being shared across hosts. And I think that you need the ability to migrate workloads (not HA, just the ability to move them.) That's so basic, no one mentions it.

      O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O
        Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

        @Obsolesce said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

        @Pete-S said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

        Maybe a dumb question, but was it is that makes it hyperconverged solution compared to "just a bunch of hypervisors" with local storage that are managed together?

        Is it vSAN (or equivalent)?

        Hyperconverged just means everything is in the same box: storage, compute, network... Vsan has nothing to do with the name.

        If you have a single node, that's true. With more than one node, it needs the extra terminology of the storage and management being shared across hosts. And I think that you need the ability to migrate workloads (not HA, just the ability to move them.) That's so basic, no one mentions it.

        Storage is not "shared" as I understand it, hence the "shared nothing" in shared nothing architecture.

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
          last edited by

          @Obsolesce said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

          Storage is not "shared" as I understand it, hence the "shared nothing" in shared nothing architecture.

          It is totally shared, has to be. All nodes see all storage. It's not "codependent."

          HC isn't "shared nothing".

          O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

            HC isn't "shared nothing".

            Never said it was. I was implying that a big use case of vSAN has been in a shared nothing architecture.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

              @EddieJennings said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

              That's what I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around: Making shared storage available without the IPOD.

              IPOD isn't the natural way to have shared storage. In your mind, as many people do because of marketing, the idea that storage is consolidated and external is just assumed, and that naturally leads you to an IPOD. Stop trying to consolidate and externalize as part of your sharing, and magically you go to hyperconvergence.

              Every standalone server in the world is hyperconverged. . .

              Compute and storage all in 1 box.

              S O 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                last edited by

                @Obsolesce said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                HC isn't "shared nothing".

                Never said it was. I was implying that a big use case of vSAN has been in a shared nothing architecture.

                vSAN's only real purpose is for sharing. "Shared" is being used two different ways here.

                The components aren't shared, the resulting workload is shared.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                  @EddieJennings said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                  That's what I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around: Making shared storage available without the IPOD.

                  IPOD isn't the natural way to have shared storage. In your mind, as many people do because of marketing, the idea that storage is consolidated and external is just assumed, and that naturally leads you to an IPOD. Stop trying to consolidate and externalize as part of your sharing, and magically you go to hyperconvergence.

                  Every standalone server in the world is hyperconverged. . .

                  Compute and storage all in 1 box.

                  That's absolutely correct, understanding that is key to understanding hyperconvergence. It is that aspect that makes HC so powerful. It also helps people to understand why standalone servers are more reliable than IPODs that cost 600% more.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • O
                    Obsolesce @DustinB3403
                    last edited by Obsolesce

                    @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                    @EddieJennings said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                    That's what I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around: Making shared storage available without the IPOD.

                    IPOD isn't the natural way to have shared storage. In your mind, as many people do because of marketing, the idea that storage is consolidated and external is just assumed, and that naturally leads you to an IPOD. Stop trying to consolidate and externalize as part of your sharing, and magically you go to hyperconvergence.

                    Every standalone server in the world is hyperconverged. . .

                    Compute and storage all in 1 box.

                    Exactly. So back to my original comment in that VSAN has nothing to do with HC...

                    @Obsolesce said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                    @Pete-S said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                    Maybe a dumb question, but was it is that makes it hyperconverged solution compared to "just a bunch of hypervisors" with local storage that are managed together?

                    Is it vSAN (or equivalent)?

                    Hyperconverged just means everything is in the same box: storage, compute, network... Vsan has nothing to do with the name.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      DustinB3403 @Obsolesce
                      last edited by DustinB3403

                      To better explain hyper-convergence, think of it like this.

                      You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        StorageNinja Vendor @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                        3PAR makes it less likely to be redundant, rather than more, I would wager.

                        3PAR is Active/active symmetric architecture with a full fiber mesh between controllers. Most cases where I've seen issues were tied to firmware on SSD's (Specifically the ~4TB Samsung ones) and people making giant RAID 5 pools, or people trying to move the array while it's running (yes this is dumb).

                        One really nice thing with the array is it does offer pretty solid vVols support with vSphere so you can manage it as a object system in that regards (No need for VMFS).

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          StorageNinja Vendor @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                          You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                          When you say that I think of LPAR combining servers (Bull, Hitachi).
                          HCI is just about doing for networking and storage what virtualization has already done for computing.

                          D S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • D
                            DustinB3403 @StorageNinja
                            last edited by

                            @StorageNinja said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                            You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                            When you say that I think of LPAR combining servers (Bull, Hitachi).
                            HCI is just about doing for networking and storage what virtualization has already done for computing.

                            That is the goal, do the same thing that virtualization has, but across more boxes with networking.

                            That's the most simplistic way to explain HCI to laymen.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                              @StorageNinja said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                              @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                              You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                              When you say that I think of LPAR combining servers (Bull, Hitachi).
                              HCI is just about doing for networking and storage what virtualization has already done for computing.

                              That is the goal, do the same thing that virtualization has, but across more boxes with networking.

                              That's the most simplistic way to explain HCI to laymen.

                              Sort of, but it then begs the question of "Didn't SAN and VLAN already do that?" And they did, so it's not a great definitely all on its own.

                              D S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                scottalanmiller @StorageNinja
                                last edited by

                                @StorageNinja said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                3PAR is Active/active symmetric architecture with a full fiber mesh between controllers. Most cases where I've seen issues were tied to firmware on SSD's (Specifically the ~4TB Samsung ones) and people making giant RAID 5 pools, or people trying to move the array while it's running (yes this is dumb).

                                It's good stuff, but it's good enough that a lot of people stop considering it as real hardware, and start thinking of it as magic.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                  @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                  @StorageNinja said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                  @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                  You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                                  When you say that I think of LPAR combining servers (Bull, Hitachi).
                                  HCI is just about doing for networking and storage what virtualization has already done for computing.

                                  That is the goal, do the same thing that virtualization has, but across more boxes with networking.

                                  That's the most simplistic way to explain HCI to laymen.

                                  Sort of, but it then begs the question of "Didn't SAN and VLAN already do that?" And they did, so it's not a great definitely all on its own.

                                  But SAN and VLAN don't when you purchase 1 SAN and X servers on top of it to go back and connect to it.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    scottalanmiller @StorageNinja
                                    last edited by

                                    @StorageNinja said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                    @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                    You take several smaller boxes and create a virtual, larger box out of the individual smaller boxes.

                                    When you say that I think of LPAR combining servers (Bull, Hitachi).

                                    or grid computing

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                      But SAN and VLAN don't when you purchase 1 SAN and X servers on top of it to go back and connect to it.

                                      They still "do for storage what virtualization did for computing" for most people - which is allow consolidation and abstraction.

                                      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                        @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                        But SAN and VLAN don't when you purchase 1 SAN and X servers on top of it to go back and connect to it.

                                        They still "do for storage what virtualization did for computing" for most people - which is allow consolidation and abstraction.

                                        I suppose if you are going from a bunch of 1U servers with six 300GB 10 NL disks to two 1U servers with 2 disks and a SAN sitting behind it that it looks consolidated. . .

                                        S S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre
                                          last edited by

                                          If I were building my own for a lab, I'd install whatever hypervisor on RAID 1 or 10 (or 5, if I can get SSDs) and StarWind VSAN on both of them and go...

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                            @DustinB3403 said in Infrastructure Needed for Hypervisor Cluster:

                                            But SAN and VLAN don't when you purchase 1 SAN and X servers on top of it to go back and connect to it.

                                            They still "do for storage what virtualization did for computing" for most people - which is allow consolidation and abstraction.

                                            I suppose if you are going from a bunch of 1U servers with six 300GB 10 NL disks to two 1U servers with 2 disks and a SAN sitting behind it that it looks consolidated. . .

                                            SAN has always been for storage consolidation. That was its only real purpose for a long time. Using it for anything else was a recent concept. SAN's primary functionality from inception to today was "cost savings through consolidation at the expense of all other primary factors such as performance, reliability, etc."

                                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 3 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post