ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Nginx VM

    IT Discussion
    nginx linux
    13
    78
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said in Nginx VM:

      @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

      @scottalanmiller said in Nginx VM:

      @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

      I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

      Really? Been a while since I did it with that little RAM, but I do from time to time and don't remember it being any different.

      Idk if it was just the process on Vultr with the custom ISO, or what, but it was bad. I think the last time I did it was Fedora 27, so it's definitely been a while.

      Oh, custom ISO. Maybe I've not tried that in a few versions.

      Yes, using the ISO (any) of fedora 28+ is slower than hell on 512 RAM.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @bnrstnr
        last edited by

        @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

        I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

        How do you get text mode on Fedora 28+ I don't see the menu choice.

        Note: I never bothered to even Google. I just let the install chug along and do something else.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • brandon220B
          brandon220
          last edited by

          I always use the NetInstall and do minimal. Don't see any reason not to.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @brandon220
            last edited by

            @brandon220 said in Nginx VM:

            I always use the NetInstall and do minimal. Don't see any reason not to.

            So do I. But there is no text install option in the menu.

            There is no difference between the ISO versions on the ungodly slow speed during the install when using 512MB RAM.

            The reason to do NetInstall is to not have to turn around and do a major update right after you install. I mean you would never install from the full ISO and then not immediately run dnf upgrade would you?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • B
              bnrstnr @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said in Nginx VM:

              @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

              I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

              How do you get text mode on Fedora 28+ I don't see the menu choice.

              Note: I never bothered to even Google. I just let the install chug along and do something else.

              Hit tab while Install Fedora 28/29 is selected, and add inst.text
              02579ed5-04ca-4c0e-83fc-792ce22b4324-image.png

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @bnrstnr
                last edited by

                @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

                @JaredBusch said in Nginx VM:

                @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

                I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

                How do you get text mode on Fedora 28+ I don't see the menu choice.

                Note: I never bothered to even Google. I just let the install chug along and do something else.

                Hit tab while Install Fedora 28/29 is selected, and add inst.text
                02579ed5-04ca-4c0e-83fc-792ce22b4324-image.png

                Thanks. Told you I never bothered to even check the Google.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @bnrstnr
                  last edited by

                  @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

                  I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

                  I've been giving a vm 2GB of ram to get through the install, and dropping it down to where I actually want it after it's done.

                  Of course, I normally deploy by cloning a snapshot, so I rarely need to go through the entire install process.

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @travisdh1
                    last edited by

                    @travisdh1 said in Nginx VM:

                    @bnrstnr said in Nginx VM:

                    I think the worst part about running with 512MB is installing Fedora. That was painful, even in text mode.

                    I've been giving a vm 2GB of ram to get through the install, and dropping it down to where I actually want it after it's done.

                    Of course, I normally deploy by cloning a snapshot, so I rarely need to go through the entire install process.

                    I am always doing it in different places. I have no reason to create a base image.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • hobbit666H
                      hobbit666
                      last edited by

                      Always wondered what the min install size you can get away with.
                      I usually go for 80gb but will start reducing this 😁

                      travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • travisdh1T
                        travisdh1 @hobbit666
                        last edited by

                        @hobbit666 said in Nginx VM:

                        Always wondered what the min install size you can get away with.
                        I usually go for 80gb but will start reducing this 😁

                        Fedora 27 minimal was ~1.2GB if I remember correctly.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch
                          last edited by JaredBusch

                          Like others I use a 20GB vDisk if it is on local/colo infrastructure.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                            last edited by

                            @travisdh1 said in Nginx VM:

                            @hobbit666 said in Nginx VM:

                            Always wondered what the min install size you can get away with.
                            I usually go for 80gb but will start reducing this 😁

                            Fedora 27 minimal was ~1.2GB if I remember correctly.

                            For the OS, but logs are the bigger component.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                              1337
                              last edited by

                              I think 20GB is outrageously large. 8GB or preferably 4GB.

                              DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @1337
                                last edited by

                                @Pete-S said in Nginx VM:

                                I think 20GB is outrageously large. 8GB or preferably 4GB.

                                Thin provision though - so what does it really matter?

                                scottalanmillerS 1 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @1337
                                  last edited by

                                  @Pete-S said in Nginx VM:

                                  I think 20GB is outrageously large. 8GB or preferably 4GB.

                                  Kind of, but thin provisioning means that we could also say that 8GB is unreasonably small. Why not have the buffer room "just in case" since it costs nothing?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @Dashrender said in Nginx VM:

                                    @Pete-S said in Nginx VM:

                                    I think 20GB is outrageously large. 8GB or preferably 4GB.

                                    Thin provision though - so what does it really matter?

                                    That's why we do it, avoid unnecessary limitations just in case a log explodes or we need to move files around or decide to change how something is used in the future. I've seen too many installs over the years have issues because they cut it as close as projected but then needed just a little extra space.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • brandon220B
                                      brandon220
                                      last edited by

                                      I saw that a lot on Ubuntu installs - The /boot partition that the installer created was always too small for the kernels after a few updates. Have yet to see that happen in Fedora.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @brandon220
                                        last edited by

                                        @brandon220 said in Nginx VM:

                                        I saw that a lot on Ubuntu installs - The /boot partition that the installer created was always too small for the kernels after a few updates. Have yet to see that happen in Fedora.

                                        Fedora handles that space completely different. No issues there. Current Ubuntu does not, either. I prefer Fedora, but Ubuntu is fine. Issues of old versions don't affect the current one.

                                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • brandon220B
                                          brandon220
                                          last edited by

                                          I had a heck of a battle last night with KVM. I converted to VMs built in HV 2019 to KVM on Fedora 29. Had to use dracut and reload the kernel to get them to boot. Took a while as I am not an expert by any means with KVM. I am upgrading a server tonight and still am on the fence about which hypervisor to go with on the new build. I like KVM because it is "lightweight" and has not given me any grief on guests that were built on the host and not migrated to it. I have a handful of HV hosts and no issues either. This new install will only be running Fedora guests. Leaning more towards KVM. I wish there was an "export" feature built into virt-manager.

                                          scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Nginx VM:

                                            @brandon220 said in Nginx VM:

                                            I saw that a lot on Ubuntu installs - The /boot partition that the installer created was always too small for the kernels after a few updates. Have yet to see that happen in Fedora.

                                            Fedora handles that space completely different. No issues there. Current Ubuntu does not, either. I prefer Fedora, but Ubuntu is fine. Issues of old versions don't affect the current one.

                                            But I also have no reason to switch back to using it. Those issues are what drove my preference for CentOS back in the day.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post