ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backup server - Software layout

    IT Discussion
    veeam backup hyper-v best practice
    12
    42
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • matteo nunziatiM
      matteo nunziati @Jimmy9008
      last edited by

      @jimmy9008 said in Backup server - Software layout:

      @obsolesce said in Backup server - Software layout:

      @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

      @obsolesce said in Backup server - Software layout:

      @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

      @aaronstuder said in Backup server - Software layout:

      Also, you could use Hyper-V Replica, or Veeam for Replication.

      Could, but Hyper-V Replication requires SA.

      Thought we got to the bottom of that before in a large discussion... replication does NOT require SA; replication requires nothing, only a license to cover the VM and hardware on which you turn on the replica.

      We did.
      Hyper-V Replication requires SA. Replication from some other tool does not.

      No we went over this. Everything SA-related was in regards to the disaster recovery benefit, nothing at all to do with Hyper-V Replication.

      Correct. You can use Hyper-V Replica without SA.

      I think they are debating the windows vm replica scenario. You can replicate linux freebsd as you want. I still miss the official docs on replica and SA. I dont know which one is right here...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AdamFA
        AdamF
        last edited by

        @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

        l plan was to install Hyper-V server on the backup server, and then create a large VM for Veeam. That way, I can utilize the backup server as a backup target, but it could also act as a secondary Hyper-V host in case something goes wrong with the main host.
        The other option could be to just install something like Fedora, on t

        Just got the server. Downloading Hyper-V ISO now.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • AdamFA
          AdamF
          last edited by

          Veeam VM moved. Now creating a big VHDX for the data drive.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • AdamFA
            AdamF
            last edited by

            Hmm... Getting a transfer speed of 127 MB/s and a transfer speed of 108 MB/s. This is transferring over the network from HV host 1 to this new backup VM on HV host 2.

            Anyone with a similar setup? Curious as to what speed others are getting on their backups.

            1 scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1
              1337 @AdamF
              last edited by

              @fuznutz04 You can't expect more if you have mechanical harddrives in RAID 1 or just 1 gigabit NIC.

              AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @AdamF
                last edited by

                @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                Hmm... Getting a transfer speed of 127 MB/s and a transfer speed of 108 MB/s. This is transferring over the network from HV host 1 to this new backup VM on HV host 2.

                Anyone with a similar setup? Curious as to what speed others are getting on their backups.

                That sounds like your device limits, as Pete pointed out.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • AdamFA
                  AdamF @1337
                  last edited by

                  @pete-s said in Backup server - Software layout:

                  @fuznutz04 You can't expect more if you have mechanical harddrives in RAID 1 or just 1 gigabit NIC.

                  That's exactly what I have. I suppose I could bond some NICs together, but I'm sure the drives are the limiting factor. At this point, for my backup volume and large backup window, it's fine. But maybe if I get a chance, I'll do some testing with bonding NICs just to see.

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @AdamF
                    last edited by

                    @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                    @pete-s said in Backup server - Software layout:

                    @fuznutz04 You can't expect more if you have mechanical harddrives in RAID 1 or just 1 gigabit NIC.

                    That's exactly what I have. I suppose I could bond some NICs together, but I'm sure the drives are the limiting factor. At this point, for my backup volume and large backup window, it's fine. But maybe if I get a chance, I'll do some testing with bonding NICs just to see.

                    I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                    You can only get single link max on any given connection, but backup software usually uses multiple threads. SO you can max out multiple links like that.

                    AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • AdamFA
                      AdamF @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                      I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                      Might be the beer talking, but when you say "Switch independent", do you mean team the nics together with the NIC driver/software before presenting it to Hyper-V, or am I way off?

                      JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @AdamF
                        last edited by

                        @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                        @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                        I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                        Might be the beer talking, but when you say "Switch independent", do you mean team the nics together with the NIC driver/software before presenting it to Hyper-V, or am I way off?

                        Way off.

                        The terms vary, Microsoft calls it Switch Independent mode.
                        Linux (Fedora) calls it load balancing.

                        Basically, it is not LACP bonding.

                        AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @AdamF
                          last edited by

                          @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                          @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                          I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                          Might be the beer talking, but when you say "Switch independent", do you mean team the nics together with the NIC driver/software before presenting it to Hyper-V, or am I way off?

                          I also never use the NIC software.

                          I only ever use the OS to make teams.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • AdamFA
                            AdamF @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                            @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                            @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                            I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                            Might be the beer talking, but when you say "Switch independent", do you mean team the nics together with the NIC driver/software before presenting it to Hyper-V, or am I way off?

                            Way off.

                            The terms vary, Microsoft calls it Switch Independent mode.
                            Linux (Fedora) calls it load balancing.

                            Basically, it is not LACP bonding.

                            Well then, looks like I'll start googling

                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @AdamF
                              last edited by

                              @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                              @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                              @fuznutz04 said in Backup server - Software layout:

                              @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                              I set up Switch Independent teams on all hypervisors always.

                              Might be the beer talking, but when you say "Switch independent", do you mean team the nics together with the NIC driver/software before presenting it to Hyper-V, or am I way off?

                              Way off.

                              The terms vary, Microsoft calls it Switch Independent mode.
                              Linux (Fedora) calls it load balancing.

                              Basically, it is not LACP bonding.

                              Well then, looks like I'll start googling

                              Hyper-V example: https://mangolassi.it/topic/10855/dell-r710-nic-teaming-issues/4

                              AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JaredBuschJ
                                JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                Screenshot form cockpit on my local KVM test system
                                0_1534295031592_92fc6ea5-b06b-429d-aac2-bfe2dff6a759-image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • AdamFA
                                  AdamF @JaredBusch
                                  last edited by

                                  @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                                  https://mangolassi.it/topic/10855/dell-r710-nic-teaming-issues/4

                                  Well then, looks like I know what I'll be doing tomorrow. Thanks!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    I use teams, even if there is only one NIC in the team most of the time, because I can add and remove NICs without impacting the higher layers.

                                    AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • AdamFA
                                      AdamF @JaredBusch
                                      last edited by

                                      @jaredbusch said in Backup server - Software layout:

                                      I use teams, even if there is only one NIC in the team most of the time, because I can add and remove NICs without impacting the higher layers.

                                      Good idea. This server I just got has the onboard GB NICs, but also 2 dual port Intel GB NICs as well. I could create a BIG team if I wanted.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • 2 / 3
                                      • First post
                                        Last post