UniFi Home Lab vs Campus
-
@scottalanmiller said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@flaxking said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@scottalanmiller said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@flaxking said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
Idk, for $10, and a little bit of time, my Meraki AP running OpenWRT was quite the bargain for a home AP
Except you can't get the unit for $10.
The UART adapter was the $10, and I didn't even have to do the free webinar, it was a colleague that did it.
I've done the webinar and they send nothing, it was a scam. They just didn't respond afterward. But it's only the AP that's free. You are getting the AP to act as a router?
I did the webinar AND got the AP. Nice to have a freebie that worked for the free license duration but now it's a paperweight. Even if it had been the same price as the UBNT, I still wouldn't have bought the Meraki AP.
-
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@black3dynamite said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
There are several case studies on UBNT websites their hardware being used.
https://www.ubnt.com/casestudies/Thanks for that. Completely forgot to include case studies. Probably one of the most important things to include.
Make sure to note that this is a vendor case study. SO it will be just as biased as a Meraki case study by Meraki.
-
@scottalanmiller said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
... UniFi and told me that Ubiquity was not enterprise grade hardware.
Says a salesman that doesn't even work in IT.
Yeah had the same with a supplier that came in to discuss a hardware refresh. As soon as we mentioned ubiquity he pffft at it lol and suggested meraki. Told them to leave
-
@hobbit666 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@scottalanmiller said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
... UniFi and told me that Ubiquity was not enterprise grade hardware.
Says a salesman that doesn't even work in IT.
Yeah had the same with a supplier that came in to discuss a hardware refresh.
This is where I tell them to leave. Suppliers have no business being in house or discussing anything, or even knowing what we have or plan to buy. Not their business, at all. It's actually a bit of a security leak to let them know.
-
Meraki isn't business grade, it's a joke. But the cost is nearly that of real security gear, like the Palo Alto. If Meraki is "good enough", you don't need Meraki at all.
You know, after thinking about this, I'm starting to think that Palo Alto might even be overkill for what we need. Our network isn't complicated. We use client VPN and will need the ability to have a site-to-site VPN, content filtering, and maybe layer 7 filtering. Although you could easily make the argument that someone could just buy a VPN for less then a Netflix subscription so it almost makes filtering pointless.
-
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
Meraki isn't business grade, it's a joke. But the cost is nearly that of real security gear, like the Palo Alto. If Meraki is "good enough", you don't need Meraki at all.
You know, after thinking about this, I'm starting to think that Palo Alto might even be overkill for what we need.
LOL, um, yeah. Unless you are a financial institution, military, etc. you don't need Palo Alto. No one in the education, non-profit, SMB, or normal business spaces needs it. It's the most extreme high end.
-
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
Although you could easily make the argument that someone could just buy a VPN for less then a Netflix subscription so it almost makes filtering pointless.
Pretty much any good VPN is free. You "never" pay for a VPN, that should be a huge red flag. I don't know of any acceptable VPN that isn't free. OpenVPN, IPSec, Ubiquiti style, ZeroTier... all free.
-
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
-
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
-
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
Tiny, private school
-
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
Good point. Net neutrality and all that.
-
@markferron said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
Tiny, private school
Doesn't mean that they shouldn't be "as good or better" than public schools.
-
We have a SentinelIPS in place. It's a blackbox that just "works"...
-
We have filtering here, but it's pretty much wide open except for a few specific things.
We do have some mighty loose traffic shaping happening here at my current job.
-
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
That is... for the most part correct. We don't really do any filtering outside of known malicious sites.
-
@scottalanmiller said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
Good point. Net neutrality and all that.
Yea at the time I didn't think anything about it, this was ~2005 so it very well could've been. . . I think it was more tied to state law about the use of taxpayer money for college and some odd set of rules.
-
@coliver said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
That is... for the most part correct. We don't really do any filtering outside of known malicious sites.
Legal use simply put, wasn't blocked. Malicious content (virus etc) was of course.
-
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@coliver said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
@dafyre said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
I do think that on a college campus, at minimum, Layer 7 (Application) filtering is necessary to keep students from using all the bandwidth for torrents instead of legitimate educational things... Like Netflix, Youtube, and Online Gaming.
In SUNY schools in NY they legally weren't (may still be in effect) allowed to limit what the students use the internet for. Being paid for by tax dollars and all. . .
That is... for the most part correct. We don't really do any filtering outside of known malicious sites.
Legal use simply put, wasn't blocked. Malicious content (virus etc) was of course.
Right, there is a simply line there.
-
The big reason I remember this as "being the way things were" was a buddy who lived at the on-campus SUNY dorms got a letter asking his flat to stop downloading so much and some laws about it. Simply asked that "they" reduce their usage, but that they couldn't actually do anything legally to stop him.
That is until his dorm-mate started torrenting movies. . .
Then they stepped in.
-
@dustinb3403 said in UniFi Home Lab vs Campus:
The big reason I remember this as "being the way things were" was a buddy who lived at the on-campus SUNY dorms got a letter asking his flat to stop downloading so much and some laws about it. Simply asked that "they" reduce their usage, but that they couldn't actually do anything legally to stop him.
That is until his dorm-mate started torrenting movies. . .
Then they stepped in.
Yepp. We get 3 or 4 notices a week with DCMAs and threats of legal actions if we don't stop the devices from downloading illegal movies.... Networking guys step in and educate user before allowing their devices back online.
