SW Year in review
-
@jaredbusch said in SW Year in review:
Would be nice to get some detail on our stats here...
But this is just scary. I am not that active on SW, but currently 160th?
I'm right there with ya... no idea how I got 165th...
-
Ha... I didn't even rank this year.
-
@dbeato said in SW Year in review:
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
Also sounds about right, I only ever look when someone takes the time to post a link here.
Interesting, I just followed you....
What I really want to know is how I got 1,695 spice ups on only 68 posts. Talk about quality over quantity!
-
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
@dbeato said in SW Year in review:
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
Also sounds about right, I only ever look when someone takes the time to post a link here.
Interesting, I just followed you....
What I really want to know is how I got 1,695 spice ups on only 68 posts. Talk about quality over quantity!
You probably spiced posts by others and you posted on 68 different posts
-
@dbeato said in SW Year in review:
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
@dbeato said in SW Year in review:
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
Also sounds about right, I only ever look when someone takes the time to post a link here.
Interesting, I just followed you....
What I really want to know is how I got 1,695 spice ups on only 68 posts. Talk about quality over quantity!
You probably spiced posts by others and you posted on 68 different posts
That'd probably do it, a few people around here are almost automatic spice ups when I actually go read a post.
-
I just checked mine. 2 spice ups, and 0 in every other category. That shows how much I use Spiceworks anymore.
-
@travisdh1 said in SW Year in review:
That's probably do it, a few people around here are almost automatic spice ups when I actually go read a post.
Correct, that is how you got there, Topics are what you posted as a new Thread, Posts are what you posted, Spiceups are the posts and threads you spiced up and so forth.
-
@fuznutz04 said in SW Year in review:
I just checked mine. 2 spice ups, and 0 in every other category. That shows how much I use Spiceworks anymore.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.
-
@dafyre said in SW Year in review:
@fuznutz04 said in SW Year in review:
I just checked mine. 2 spice ups, and 0 in every other category. That shows how much I use Spiceworks anymore.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.
No, @Grey wins
-
I am surprised at @RojoLoco LOL
-
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
-
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
I just find it kind of humerus that we're trying to see who has been on SW the least.
-
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
Well I started the post saying, I wanted to see stats for here too. So I was not mocking anything.
-
@jaredbusch said in SW Year in review:
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
Well I stated the post saying, I wanted to see stats for here too. So I was not mocking anything.
Sorry, I didn't see your bit about that. I was just making a general comment.
-
I think it's just that we've all noticed a trend and have gotten to know one another over here more... I'd rather have a few close friends making fun of me than everybody over at Spiceworks.
-
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
So poking fun at some questions is good for you but not this? I am all up for SW but if you want me to find people that have not posted in a while I can tell you.... as you can see I post more on SW than here...
-
@dbeato said in SW Year in review:
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
So poking fun at some questions is good for you but not this? I am all up for SW but if you want me to find people that have not posted in a while I can tell you.... as you can see I post more on SW than here...
Huh.... ok .. I need a
-
@scottalanmiller A query to pull this information out into years would be great.
-
@jaredbusch said in SW Year in review:
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
Well I started the post saying, I wanted to see stats for here too. So I was not mocking anything.
Yeah, that would be interesting. We need someone to whip up a stat system.
-
@scottalanmiller said in SW Year in review:
@jaredbusch said in SW Year in review:
@dustinb3403 said in SW Year in review:
It's kind of sad we're mocking their processes. I mean, I get poking fun at some of the questions.
This on the other hand; I don't know, seems weird.
Well I started the post saying, I wanted to see stats for here too. So I was not mocking anything.
Yeah, that would be interesting. We need someone to whip up a stat system.
Paging @JeremyRichardson?
