ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing

    IT Discussion
    haproxy selinux
    5
    18
    6.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @momurda
      last edited by

      @momurda said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

      @jaredbusch Does this mean you need to only change permissions on the cert file?

      I will delete it and recreate it directly into the right location and make sure it has the right permissions.

      Because this will have to become part of a script to ensure LE updates going forward.

      HAProxy does not work with LE because HAProxy requires the cert to be in a single combined file and LE doesn't to that.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch
        last edited by JaredBusch

        Hrm. my ctrl+R search shows I did it right into the directory. But I did manually copy it once first. I bet overwriting does not fix SELinux context?

        cat /etc/letsencrypt/live/pbx.domain.com/fullchain.pem /etc/letsencrypt/live/pbx.domain.com/privkey.pem > /etc/haproxy/certs/pbx.domain.com.pem
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch
          last edited by

          Cleared the audit log (moved it) and then rebooted the server again. Only this now.

          No idea what this means. Does anyone else?

          [root@exchangeproxy ~]# sealert -a /var/log/audit/audit.log 
          100% done
          found 1 alerts in /var/log/audit/audit.log
          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          
          SELinux is preventing haproxy-systemd from execute_no_trans access on the file /usr/sbin/haproxy.
          
          *****  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests   **************************
          
          If you believe that haproxy-systemd should be allowed execute_no_trans access on the haproxy file by default.
          Then you should report this as a bug.
          You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
          Do
          allow this access for now by executing:
          # ausearch -c 'haproxy-systemd' --raw | audit2allow -M my-haproxysystemd
          # semodule -X 300 -i my-haproxysystemd.pp
          
          
          Additional Information:
          Source Context                system_u:system_r:haproxy_t:s0
          Target Context                system_u:object_r:haproxy_exec_t:s0
          Target Objects                /usr/sbin/haproxy [ file ]
          Source                        haproxy-systemd
          Source Path                   haproxy-systemd
          Port                          <Unknown>
          Host                          <Unknown>
          Source RPM Packages           
          Target RPM Packages           haproxy-1.7.9-1.fc26.x86_64
          Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.13.1-260.13.fc26.noarch
          Selinux Enabled               True
          Policy Type                   targeted
          Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
          Host Name                     exchangeproxy.domain.local
          Platform                      Linux exchangeproxy.domain.local
                                        4.13.9-200.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 23 13:52:45
                                        UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64
          Alert Count                   1
          First Seen                    2017-11-27 18:33:37 CST
          Last Seen                     2017-11-27 18:33:37 CST
          Local ID                      39e99f05-e873-4b45-bbdb-029da98dac90
          
          Raw Audit Messages
          type=AVC msg=audit(1511829217.493:100): avc:  denied  { execute_no_trans } for  pid=630 comm="haproxy-systemd" path="/usr/sbin/haproxy" dev="dm-0" ino=8718069 scontext=system_u:system_r:haproxy_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:haproxy_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
          
          
          Hash: haproxy-systemd,haproxy_t,haproxy_exec_t,file,execute_no_trans
          
          [root@exchangeproxy ~]# 
          
          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch
            last edited by

            Obviously, I can run the above audit2allow and make it work, but that doesn't help me with the next install. I have to make it fail once and install the setroubleshoot before I can fix it under that scenario.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @jaredbusch said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

              execute_no_trans

              Ya this is further than I have had to deal with. I think the execute_no_trans has to deal with transitioning from domains. That's all I know about it. I think for that to work you have to define the entrypoint for the type, but I don't know how to do that.

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stacksofplatesS
                stacksofplates
                last edited by

                What is the context type on the cert vs the content type of the directory?

                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch @stacksofplates
                  last edited by JaredBusch

                  @stacksofplates said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                  What is the context type on the cert vs the content type of the directory?

                  I recreated the cert in the same directory as the other and that problem went away.

                  They are both in /etc/pki/tls/certs now

                  -rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:cert_t:s0 5217 Nov 27 18:26 pbx.domain.com.pem
                  -rw-------. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:cert_t:s0 3659 Oct  9 21:15 remote.domain.com.pem
                  
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @stacksofplates
                    last edited by

                    @stacksofplates said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                    @jaredbusch said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                    execute_no_trans

                    Ya this is further than I have had to deal with. I think the execute_no_trans has to deal with transitioning from domains. That's all I know about it. I think for that to work you have to define the entrypoint for the type, but I don't know how to do that.

                    Looks like I am not alone.
                    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447800

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @JaredBusch
                      last edited by JaredBusch

                      @jaredbusch said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                      @stacksofplates said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                      @jaredbusch said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                      execute_no_trans

                      Ya this is further than I have had to deal with. I think the execute_no_trans has to deal with transitioning from domains. That's all I know about it. I think for that to work you have to define the entrypoint for the type, but I don't know how to do that.

                      Looks like I am not alone.
                      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447800

                      and fuck.. it was fixed and pushed live on the 15th.

                      0_1511830466302_97500aa8-dd0a-4fc3-9573-0ff4d25d108e-image.png

                      Apparently i never setup this server to auto update...

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @jaredbusch said in HAProxy not workign with SELinux enforcing:

                        Apparently i never setup this server to auto update...

                        Ayup.....

                        [root@exchangeproxy ~]# dnf -y update
                        Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:45 ago on Mon 27 Nov 2017 06:44:36 PM CST.
                        Dependencies resolved.
                        ==================================================================================================================================
                         Package                                   Arch                  Version                            Repository               Size
                        ==================================================================================================================================
                        
                        <snip>
                        
                        Upgrading:
                         selinux-policy                            noarch                3.13.1-260.14.fc26                 updates                 508 k
                         selinux-policy-targeted                   noarch                3.13.1-260.14.fc26                 updates                 9.4 M
                        
                        <snip>
                        
                        Transaction Summary
                        ==================================================================================================================================
                        Install   3 Packages
                        Upgrade  43 Packages
                        Remove    3 Packages
                        
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post