System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7
-
Now showing 405 devices connected.
-
@gjacobse said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
Now showing 405 devices connected.
How about the CPU?
-
@scottalanmiller said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
@gjacobse said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
Now showing 405 devices connected.
How about the CPU?
-
09:00:01 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 09:10:01 AM all 8.39 0.00 0.28 0.07 0.79 90.48 09:20:01 AM all 14.24 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.79 84.58 09:30:01 AM all 7.18 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.44 92.15 09:40:01 AM all 12.75 0.00 0.23 0.13 0.53 86.35 09:50:01 AM all 15.59 0.00 0.24 0.10 0.36 83.71 10:00:01 AM all 27.39 0.00 0.28 0.10 0.54 71.69 10:10:01 AM all 18.61 0.00 0.24 0.21 0.61 80.33 10:20:01 AM all 24.03 0.00 0.30 0.15 0.71 74.80 10:30:01 AM all 8.70 0.00 0.14 0.09 0.47 90.60 10:40:01 AM all 20.68 0.00 0.27 0.15 0.95 77.95 10:50:01 AM all 10.40 0.00 0.27 0.08 0.80 88.45 Average: all 4.82 0.01 0.13 0.09 0.17 94.78
-
That's higher than I would have expected, but SAR is what we need, not htop.
-
There we go, and still too high.
-
@scottalanmiller said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
There we go, and still too high.
In some regard yes I would agree - However as part of the cycling, I have updated about 15 clients that were on the previous build to the latest. So that could be part of the increased CPU as it was pushing out the update.
-
@gjacobse said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
@scottalanmiller said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
There we go, and still too high.
In some regard yes I would agree - However as part of the cycling, I have updated about 15 clients that were on the previous build to the latest. So that could be part of the increased CPU as it was pushing out the update.
CPU should not do much while pushing out an update. That's a pretty light CPU activity.
-
@scottalanmiller said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
@gjacobse said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
@scottalanmiller said in System Lockups with ScreenConnect 6.0.11622.6115 on CentOS 7:
There we go, and still too high.
In some regard yes I would agree - However as part of the cycling, I have updated about 15 clients that were on the previous build to the latest. So that could be part of the increased CPU as it was pushing out the update.
CPU should not do much while pushing out an update. That's a pretty light CPU activity.
Just received and replied to a followup support email. .cc appropriate persons.
-
File size this morning:
]$ ls -l total 35772 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 454 Aug 25 19:15 ExtensionConfiguration.xml drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 8 09:44 Helper -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 654 Aug 25 19:15 License.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23699 Dec 21 19:15 Role.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4558848 Dec 22 08:06 Session.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24956928 Dec 19 20:11 Session.db.bak -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32768 Dec 22 08:18 Session.db-shm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6991672 Dec 22 08:18 Session.db-wal -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4030 Oct 25 08:55 SessionEventTrigger.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5178 Dec 2 08:13 SessionGroup.xml drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Dec 12 12:55 Toolbox -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Dec 14 17:24 User.cd60043d-556e-4b23-9ef1-9959e6cea952.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21905 Dec 21 19:51 User.xml
CPU history:
]$ sar Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64 (-) 12/22/2016 _x86_64_ (1 CPU) 12:00:01 AM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 12:10:01 AM all 1.90 0.00 0.18 0.08 0.15 97.70 12:20:01 AM all 0.74 0.00 0.09 0.03 0.07 99.07 12:30:01 AM all 1.41 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.08 98.33 12:40:01 AM all 0.75 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.09 99.05 12:50:01 AM all 1.42 0.00 0.12 0.08 0.10 98.29 01:00:02 AM all 0.76 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.08 99.04 01:10:01 AM all 1.68 0.00 0.14 0.10 0.20 97.89 01:20:01 AM all 1.05 0.00 0.13 0.04 0.11 98.66 01:30:01 AM all 1.48 0.00 0.12 0.07 0.13 98.20 01:40:01 AM all 0.80 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.10 98.98 01:50:01 AM all 1.45 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.13 98.24 02:00:01 AM all 0.85 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.08 98.96 02:10:01 AM all 1.53 0.00 0.13 0.09 0.18 98.07 02:20:01 AM all 1.04 0.00 0.15 0.04 0.11 98.66 02:30:01 AM all 1.55 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.11 98.13 02:40:02 AM all 0.76 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.10 99.03 02:50:01 AM all 1.47 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.15 98.18 03:00:01 AM all 0.75 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.10 99.04 03:10:01 AM all 1.68 0.00 0.16 0.08 0.20 97.87 03:20:01 AM all 0.69 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.10 99.09 03:30:01 AM all 1.47 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.16 98.20 03:40:01 AM all 0.76 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.12 99.00 03:50:01 AM all 1.61 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.13 98.04 04:00:01 AM all 0.75 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.11 99.03 04:10:01 AM all 2.05 0.00 0.17 0.12 0.18 97.47 04:20:01 AM all 0.82 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.13 98.84 04:30:01 AM all 1.56 0.00 0.12 0.17 0.20 97.95 04:40:01 AM all 0.75 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.15 98.99 04:50:01 AM all 1.43 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.22 98.17 05:00:01 AM all 0.78 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.20 98.90 05:10:01 AM all 1.98 0.00 0.24 0.08 0.25 97.44 05:20:01 AM all 0.85 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.14 98.89 05:30:01 AM all 1.46 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.19 98.17 05:40:01 AM all 0.80 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.15 98.91 05:50:01 AM all 1.72 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.28 97.74 06:00:01 AM all 0.87 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.20 98.80 06:10:01 AM all 1.59 0.00 0.14 0.13 0.26 97.89 06:20:01 AM all 1.03 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.17 98.61 06:30:01 AM all 1.70 0.00 0.13 0.25 0.23 97.69 06:40:01 AM all 0.94 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.17 98.69 06:50:01 AM all 1.58 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.29 97.88 07:00:01 AM all 0.88 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.22 98.76 07:10:01 AM all 1.81 0.00 0.13 0.15 0.38 97.53 07:20:01 AM all 1.44 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.29 98.01 07:30:01 AM all 1.67 0.00 0.11 0.35 0.36 97.52 07:40:01 AM all 0.99 0.00 0.09 0.15 0.22 98.56 07:50:01 AM all 1.76 0.00 0.12 0.34 0.35 97.43 08:00:01 AM all 1.16 0.00 0.10 0.06 0.15 98.53 08:10:01 AM all 1.99 0.00 0.13 0.10 0.19 97.60 Average: all 1.26 0.00 0.11 0.09 0.17 98.36
-
Any lockups since the fix?