I can't even
-
@JaredBusch said in I can't even:
This thread is not like eschewing best practices. It is simply wtf.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1873496-port-forward-same-port-to-multiple-addresses
Is he talking about NAT'ing at layer 3? From what I understand, he wants to forward anything from his (probably single) external IP to multiple internal IPs. Like you said, that doesn't work. The closest thing I can think of is a Loadbalancer, but one that works at layer 3? Probably not. CARP could do, but you need a dedicated external IP and a shared one between all CARP members, as far as I know.
-
@JaredBusch said in I can't even:
This thread is not like eschewing best practices. It is simply wtf.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1873496-port-forward-same-port-to-multiple-addresses
@JaredBusch have you ever been criticized in code form before, LOL.
-
@BRRABill said in I can't even:
@JaredBusch said in I can't even:
This thread is not like eschewing best practices. It is simply wtf.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1873496-port-forward-same-port-to-multiple-addresses
@JaredBusch have you ever been criticized in code form before, LOL.
that was the highlight of the thread for me lol.
-
My head hurts now... That's the first time I've ever seen anybody criticized in code, lol.
-
Gotta love JustRob's response.
-
/cry /sob i did not get BA...
-
@dafyre said in I can't even:
My head hurts now... That's the first time I've ever seen anybody criticized in code, lol.
That's pretty easy:
*dafyre = null; -
This is dumb..
There's probally some crazy ass expensive software like that can do it though.... It would have to be like a Citrix XenApp sofrware with a web reverse proxy too or something.
Hell I think even Xenapp actually uses multiple ports just 80 for the webinterface and the actual gui is done over others.
-
@Jason said in I can't even:
Hell I think even Xenapp actually uses multiple ports just 80 for the webinterface and the actual gui is done over others.
Yes, the ICA port is used for the real GUI.
-
Ported from the eschewed.
-
IOP's. That's a new way to write that.
-
Why people shared iscsi storage. . . . why. . . .
-
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1883631-in-the-market-for-new-firewalls
Oh, the recommendations are flying, and the money is burning!
-
@travisdh1 said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1883631-in-the-market-for-new-firewalls
Oh, the recommendations are flying, and the money is burning!
Look at the list of products to vote for..
FFS. . . LOL
-
Is this another Storage-less server setup. . .
I may be wrong, but I'm thinking it is... and wondering why the heck this is so common!
-
Another "I assume SAM is crazy so I made up what he said" thread...
At least @Tim_G knew what I meant and had my back.
-
@scottalanmiller For the record so did I. . .
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Another "I assume SAM is crazy so I made up what he said" thread...
At least @Tim_G knew what I meant and had my back.
You aren't?
-
@coliver said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Another "I assume SAM is crazy so I made up what he said" thread...
At least @Tim_G knew what I meant and had my back.
You aren't?
It's the "....so I made up what he said" bit that's the problem.
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
IOP's. That's a new way to write that.
- Slow server? Just increase the IOP's. It's right there. In the settings. Don't worry: it exists.
- Slow internet? Wiggle the network cable, and then flex it back and forth like a glow stick. That will get rid of any blockages in the line.
- Slow printing? Try using a more slippery type of paper.
