What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
You aren't in the top forty yet, even!
I'm working on it And I'm here for just 2 months or so
-
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
You aren't in the top forty yet, even!
I'm working on it At I'm here for just 2 months or so
Slacker....
-
@DustinB3403 Sorry
-
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-before -
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-beforeFunny. Whenever I see someone using /16, it's always 10.0.0.0. Like you can't use multiple /25 for example in that range...
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-beforelol, I'll trade ya buddy, at least I know how to fix that!
-
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-beforeFunny. Whenever I see someone using /16, it's always 10.0.0.0. Like you can't use multiple /25 for example in that range...
Yeah, someone once heard that 10.0.0.0 was a Class A in 1992 and has carried on that misinformation for two and a half decade.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-beforeFunny. Whenever I see someone using /16, it's always 10.0.0.0. Like you can't use multiple /25 for example in that range...
Yeah, someone once heard that 10.0.0.0 was a Class A in 1992 and has carried on that misinformation for two and a half decade.
Yepp, but Class A is /8, not /16
-
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Seriously, I have a /16 network but am blaming Elastix?
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1712402-anyone-use-elastix-pbx-software-beforeFunny. Whenever I see someone using /16, it's always 10.0.0.0. Like you can't use multiple /25 for example in that range...
Yeah, someone once heard that 10.0.0.0 was a Class A in 1992 and has carried on that misinformation for two and a half decade.
Yepp, but Class A is /8, not /16
According to http://www.subnet-calculator.com/subnet.php?net_class=A, the Class is determined by the first octet.
The first network I inherited was a 90.0.0.0/8 for private IP addresses! WTF?
-
-
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
-
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
-
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
SAM mentioned classes, I was just explaining that a private class A network (10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255) is nothing else but 10.0.0.0/8
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain address use for subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
-
Just caught a Lapras about an hour ago on lunch! BOOM!
-
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
Yepp. There's a reason that no one uses classes anymore. At least in theory:
https://mangolassi.it/topic/9787/why-i-love-hiring-those-that-teach-themselves/ -
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
Yepp. There's a reason that no one uses classes anymore. At least in theory.
It's not necessary... If it's not necessary, it's obsolete... and we all know what happens to obsolete stuff... (pause for effect) ... IT folks that don't know any better keep dragging it back from the brink of /dev/null.
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
Yepp. There's a reason that no one uses classes anymore. At least in theory.
It's not necessary... If it's not necessary, it's obsolete... and we all know what happens to obsolete stuff... (pause for effect) ... IT folks that don't know any better keep dragging it back from the brink of /dev/null.
Just edited my post above and added a link to SAMs topic about life-long learning in IT:
https://mangolassi.it/topic/9787/why-i-love-hiring-those-that-teach-themselves -
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
Yepp. There's a reason that no one uses classes anymore. At least in theory.
Hell even now class usually just refers to large groups of what you'd notate with CIDR anyway. Like "It's a class A" "oh OK so I'll put 0.0.0.0/8". A definitely obsolete thing I hear very rarely is the different bytes being referred to as "octets", even though they're obviously written in decimal or hexidecimal. It just tells me they don't know what the hell octet even means and think it means byte or class or something.
-
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tonyshowoff said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@thwr said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dafyre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network#Introduction_of_address_classes
Classes? CIDR is the only way to fly... or route I guess.
That's why I posted... CIDR has been the norm for the past few years as far as I can tell... Classes never really mattered anyway... Did they?
Sort of, but most often they were used as a means to explain subnetting rather than being used as a literal standard in their own right.
Yepp. There's a reason that no one uses classes anymore. At least in theory.
Hell even now class usually just refers to large groups of what you'd notate with CIDR anyway. Like "It's a class A" "oh OK so I'll put 0.0.0.0/8". A definitely obsolete thing I hear very rarely is the different bytes being referred to as "octets", even though they're obviously written in decimal or hexidecimal. It just tells me they don't know what the hell octet even means and think it means byte or class or something.
IP Address = 4 decimal numbers = 4 octets... I got started calling them octets when I was taking my Cisco certs... and it just never went away, lol.