ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Hypervisor, hypervisor - who's got the best hypervisor?

    IT Discussion
    11
    82
    8.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • coliverC
      coliver @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      @DustinB3403 said:

      Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

      Is what cost justifiable?

      If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

      Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

      You're already invested in ESXi that's a sunk cost so you have to weigh the cost of migration and support of your new infrastructure against the ongoing maintenance and support licenses from VMWare. From what I've heard from people who have done the migration it saves money in the long term.

      DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        @DustinB3403 said:

        Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

        Is what cost justifiable?

        If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

        Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

        So yeah, paying for updates seems like it could be a huge rip off. If your time is worth the conversion I'd recommend Xen. (see all of my other topics)

        Ton's a great, really very good performing options for things you're living without now.

        Plus updates are free.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @coliver
          last edited by

          @coliver said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @coliver said:

          You have a lot of Windows, it may be easier to manage if you maintain the same stack. Not saying XenServer is hard or anything, I actually find it easier, but Hyper-V is very capable and you already have the Windows Infrastructure in place to support it.

          Hyper-V is the hardest to use regardless of stack, IMHO. Not sure when it would be chosen based on ease of use. If you are an all Windows shop and wanted ease of use, I think XenServer still wins.

          I'm not sure about that. An all Windows shop and ease of use may go to Hyper-V. I haven't managed XenServer in production so I'm not sure but Hyper-V is super simple, almost as simple as XenServer, it does also have API hooks for software like Unitrends and Veeam if @Dashrender uses either of those applications.

          Just the clarification around licensing alone and the misinformation in communities about Hyper-V alone is a lot more work. getting help is hard because there is so much confusion around it. And the management tools are not unlimited and free like on XS. That alone is more work that XS is total. It's not that it si hard, but how does using Windows make it any easier? That's where I'm always lost. There isn't anything about having used Windows that makes Hyper-V easier or harder to use. I've used it, it is generic as far as interface.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @coliver
            last edited by

            @coliver said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @coliver said:

            You have a lot of Windows, it may be easier to manage if you maintain the same stack. Not saying XenServer is hard or anything, I actually find it easier, but Hyper-V is very capable and you already have the Windows Infrastructure in place to support it.

            Hyper-V is the hardest to use regardless of stack, IMHO. Not sure when it would be chosen based on ease of use. If you are an all Windows shop and wanted ease of use, I think XenServer still wins.

            I'm not sure about that. An all Windows shop and ease of use may go to Hyper-V. I haven't managed XenServer in production so I'm not sure but Hyper-V is super simple, almost as simple as XenServer, it does also have API hooks for software like Unitrends and Veeam if @Dashrender uses either of those applications.

            XenServer has API for Unitrends too.

            coliverC dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @coliver
              last edited by

              @coliver said:

              @Dashrender said:

              @DustinB3403 said:

              Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

              Is what cost justifiable?

              If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

              Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

              You're already invested in ESXi that's a sunk cost so you have to weigh the cost of migration and support of your new infrastructure against the ongoing maintenance and support licenses from VMWare. From what I've heard from people who have done the migration it saves money in the long term.

              Which saves them money in the long term? Migrating or not migrating?

              DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS coliverC 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender Migrating saves them money in the long term, because they don't have to pay for updates. (or anything else if they chose not too)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • PSX_DefectorP
                  PSX_Defector
                  last edited by

                  Quite frankly I would just stick with Vmware. It's mature, well designed, and you are fairly up to date on the license if you are using 5.5. EOL for it is ~2018.

                  P2V all those other boxes immediately. Hell, you don't even have to worry about losing stuff. Just do it during a downtime window, spin down old and fire up the new, hope it doesn't break. If it does, then failback to the physical.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • coliverC
                    coliver @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @coliver said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @coliver said:

                    You have a lot of Windows, it may be easier to manage if you maintain the same stack. Not saying XenServer is hard or anything, I actually find it easier, but Hyper-V is very capable and you already have the Windows Infrastructure in place to support it.

                    Hyper-V is the hardest to use regardless of stack, IMHO. Not sure when it would be chosen based on ease of use. If you are an all Windows shop and wanted ease of use, I think XenServer still wins.

                    I'm not sure about that. An all Windows shop and ease of use may go to Hyper-V. I haven't managed XenServer in production so I'm not sure but Hyper-V is super simple, almost as simple as XenServer, it does also have API hooks for software like Unitrends and Veeam if @Dashrender uses either of those applications.

                    XenServer has API for Unitrends too.

                    That's news to me. Last I heard they were doing agent based backups on the individual VMs.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @coliver
                      last edited by

                      @coliver said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @DustinB3403 said:

                      Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

                      Is what cost justifiable?

                      If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

                      Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

                      You're already invested in ESXi that's a sunk cost so you have to weigh the cost of migration and support of your new infrastructure against the ongoing maintenance and support licenses from VMWare. From what I've heard from people who have done the migration it saves money in the long term.

                      Generally the migrations aren't too painful. And the licensing and cost overhead of VMware is high. Even the cheapest option of ~$520 adds up quickly when you spend an hour or two getting that straightened out regularly, need special logins to get to downloads, have to track accounts, paying for that every year or so, worrying about licensing changes in the future, etc.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @coliver said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @DustinB3403 said:

                        Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

                        Is what cost justifiable?

                        If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

                        Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

                        You're already invested in ESXi that's a sunk cost so you have to weigh the cost of migration and support of your new infrastructure against the ongoing maintenance and support licenses from VMWare. From what I've heard from people who have done the migration it saves money in the long term.

                        Which saves them money in the long term? Migrating or not migrating?

                        Migrating.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @JaredBusch said:

                          @Dashrender I would use Hyper-V for the 3rd party tools. XenServer if I had all the time in the world to do everything myself.

                          What kinds of things do you need to do yourself in XenServer? it has a great third party tooling ecosystem too. Just most of it is free rather than much of it being pay only.

                          Obviously, the 900# gorilla. Backups.
                          Can I do it natively for free with both solutions? Yes.
                          Can I get a solid reliable and supported 3rd party solution for both systems? Not that I have seen for XenServer yet.

                          dafyreD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @coliver said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @DustinB3403 said:

                            Before I answer, what features are you currently lacking from VMware? Is there something that you're needing that you just can't get with VMware or is this cost justifiable?

                            Is what cost justifiable?

                            If you're talking about the conversion cost (mostly in my time), then yes I'd say it's justifiable so I get away from bad investments, i.e. paying for updates to ESXi Essentials. (damn I forget the phrase that Scott always uses).

                            Beyond that - no I am lacking no features/functions that I want.

                            You're already invested in ESXi that's a sunk cost so you have to weigh the cost of migration and support of your new infrastructure against the ongoing maintenance and support licenses from VMWare. From what I've heard from people who have done the migration it saves money in the long term.

                            Which saves them money in the long term? Migrating or not migrating?

                            Migrating, sorry for not being clear. The migration saves money almost every time.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dafyreD
                              dafyre @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              @coliver said:

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              @coliver said:

                              You have a lot of Windows, it may be easier to manage if you maintain the same stack. Not saying XenServer is hard or anything, I actually find it easier, but Hyper-V is very capable and you already have the Windows Infrastructure in place to support it.

                              Hyper-V is the hardest to use regardless of stack, IMHO. Not sure when it would be chosen based on ease of use. If you are an all Windows shop and wanted ease of use, I think XenServer still wins.

                              I'm not sure about that. An all Windows shop and ease of use may go to Hyper-V. I haven't managed XenServer in production so I'm not sure but Hyper-V is super simple, almost as simple as XenServer, it does also have API hooks for software like Unitrends and Veeam if @Dashrender uses either of those applications.

                              XenServer has API for Unitrends too.

                              However, if I recall correctly, there is a free version of Unitrends for other Hyper-V and VMswear, but not XenServer. Is that correct?

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dafyreD
                                dafyre @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said:

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                @JaredBusch said:

                                @Dashrender I would use Hyper-V for the 3rd party tools. XenServer if I had all the time in the world to do everything myself.

                                What kinds of things do you need to do yourself in XenServer? it has a great third party tooling ecosystem too. Just most of it is free rather than much of it being pay only.

                                Obviously, the 900# gorilla. Backups.
                                Can I do it natively for free with both solutions? Yes.
                                Can I get a solid reliable and supported 3rd party solution for both systems? Not that I have seen for XenServer yet.

                                If you are concerned about backups, Unitrends does offer a paid version for XenServer.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                  last edited by

                                  @JaredBusch said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @JaredBusch said:

                                  @Dashrender I would use Hyper-V for the 3rd party tools. XenServer if I had all the time in the world to do everything myself.

                                  What kinds of things do you need to do yourself in XenServer? it has a great third party tooling ecosystem too. Just most of it is free rather than much of it being pay only.

                                  Obviously, the 900# gorilla. Backups.
                                  Can I do it natively for free with both solutions? Yes.
                                  Can I get a solid reliable and supported 3rd party solution for both systems? Not that I have seen for XenServer yet.

                                  You don't feel that the Unitrends XenServer solution is reliable? What issues have you had with it?

                                  What about the free Xen Orchestra backup solution for XS? I've not used that one, but it is third party and @DustinB3403 has been having good luck with it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @dafyre
                                    last edited by

                                    @dafyre said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    @coliver said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    @coliver said:

                                    You have a lot of Windows, it may be easier to manage if you maintain the same stack. Not saying XenServer is hard or anything, I actually find it easier, but Hyper-V is very capable and you already have the Windows Infrastructure in place to support it.

                                    Hyper-V is the hardest to use regardless of stack, IMHO. Not sure when it would be chosen based on ease of use. If you are an all Windows shop and wanted ease of use, I think XenServer still wins.

                                    I'm not sure about that. An all Windows shop and ease of use may go to Hyper-V. I haven't managed XenServer in production so I'm not sure but Hyper-V is super simple, almost as simple as XenServer, it does also have API hooks for software like Unitrends and Veeam if @Dashrender uses either of those applications.

                                    XenServer has API for Unitrends too.

                                    However, if I recall correctly, there is a free version of Unitrends for other Hyper-V and VMswear, but not XenServer. Is that correct?

                                    That is correct, currently UT has not made their XS product free. The free one for the other platforms is probably too limited for @Dashrender scale anyway, though.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      I will never buy Unitrends (at least not at this company). It's just to darned expensive.

                                      That said, I really like Veeam, and I think it would actually save me a fair amount over my renewal costs from AppAssure Replay, after I consolidate everything.

                                      I've seen Dustin's posts about backups, and I just don't want to deal with that!

                                      I love the continuous forever backups that I currently have with Replay, and makes me grimmis a little knowing that Veeam wants you to do a full backup on a regular schedule.

                                      scottalanmillerS DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        @Dashrender said:

                                        I will never buy Unitrends (at least not at this company). It's just to darned expensive.

                                        have yo upriced out their XS backup software?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          Not saying that they are cheap, I don't know the pricing. I only know that UT XS software backup is not likely too closely tied in price to their non-XS hardware backups.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            Veeam is really nice but their focus on the VMware / Hyper-V world is disappointing. Very much so. Which is why they've focused on the midmarket and I think are looking at a big shakeup as I see Vmware losing a ton of ground now that they are so dramatically behind the ball.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 2 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post