ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Dual PC-Quad Monitor KVM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved IT Discussion
    kvm
    20 Posts 6 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dafyreD
      dafyre @gjacobse
      last edited by

      @gjacobse said:

      One thought I had was to use a VM,... but just going over that in my mind,.. that wouldn't be possible. As they would need more than one VM to host all the services needed. Which isn't practical. Unless you can have more than one monitor on a VM....

      In this case, I think he means a KVM switch that will support more than 1 screen.

      gjacobseG dafyreD scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Unless there is some serious hardware complexities here, this is a perfect use case for virtualization on the desktop. Mac hardware if they need one of the systems to be Mac. You'll want lots of memory, but no more than if you had two machines anyway. You can save money and get better performance with VMs than if you did this with two separate machines, actually.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • gjacobseG
          gjacobse @dafyre
          last edited by

          @dafyre said:

          @gjacobse said:

          One thought I had was to use a VM,... but just going over that in my mind,.. that wouldn't be possible. As they would need more than one VM to host all the services needed. Which isn't practical. Unless you can have more than one monitor on a VM....

          In this case, I think he means a KVM switch that will support more than 1 screen.

          Yes, not KVM - Linux VM

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dafyreD
            dafyre @dafyre
            last edited by

            @dafyre said:

            @gjacobse said:

            One thought I had was to use a VM,... but just going over that in my mind,.. that wouldn't be possible. As they would need more than one VM to host all the services needed. Which isn't practical. Unless you can have more than one monitor on a VM....

            In this case, I think he means a KVM switch that will support more than 1 screen.

            If they already have two devices, why not use something like Synergy to allow them to control both devices with one keyboard & mouse?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • coliverC
              coliver
              last edited by

              I was going to recommend Synergy as well. It works really well for what you want to do here.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @dafyre
                last edited by

                @dafyre said:

                @gjacobse said:

                One thought I had was to use a VM,... but just going over that in my mind,.. that wouldn't be possible. As they would need more than one VM to host all the services needed. Which isn't practical. Unless you can have more than one monitor on a VM....

                In this case, I think he means a KVM switch that will support more than 1 screen.

                I understood that, Keyboard / Video / Mouse, not KVM the VM technology. But this is case where virtualization would serve the need better, I believe.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stacksofplatesS
                  stacksofplates
                  last edited by stacksofplates

                  I agree with synergy, it's really seamless.

                  Too bad they aren't running on Linux. You can have an X session for each monitor.

                  dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • dafyreD
                    dafyre @stacksofplates
                    last edited by

                    @johnhooks said:

                    I agree with synergy, it's really seamless.

                    Too bad they aren't running on Linux. You can have an X session for each monitor.

                    That was actually my first thought, lol.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • J
                      Jason Banned
                      last edited by

                      I've seen Dual Monitor KVMs before. Quad will be expensive because it's rare but they do make it.

                      http://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-Port-Monitor-Switch-Audio/dp/B00310EES0

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gjacobseG
                        gjacobse
                        last edited by

                        Synergy seems to be a good option. Watched a few short videos on it, and it might work. I may test it out here on my desktop and laptop.

                        I'm running three monitors on my office PC, and then only one with my laptop...

                        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dafyreD
                          dafyre @gjacobse
                          last edited by

                          @gjacobse said:

                          Synergy seems to be a good option. Watched a few short videos on it, and it might work. I may test it out here on my desktop and laptop.

                          I'm running three monitors on my office PC, and then only one with my laptop...

                          It should work for that. There are some GUI config tools for windows as well.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • gjacobseG
                            gjacobse
                            last edited by

                            Well I took a leap and got Synergy Pro and after a little bit of configuring (deleting the temp config file) it connect via SSH and I'm off. Seems to be smooth in operation. It is not a replacement for a monitor.. so I use my laptop's screen. In this case I have one other computer I could put it on, but it's across the room and is already running X2Go.

                            Thus far,.. Synergy-Project for the win.

                            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • stacksofplatesS
                              stacksofplates @gjacobse
                              last edited by

                              @gjacobse said:

                              Well I took a leap and got Synergy Pro and after a little bit of configuring (deleting the temp config file) it connect via SSH and I'm off. Seems to be smooth in operation. It is not a replacement for a monitor.. so I use my laptop's screen. In this case I have one other computer I could put it on, but it's across the room and is already running X2Go.

                              Thus far,.. Synergy-Project for the win.

                              Wow I haven't used it since their site was synergy-foss. It's a lot more complicated to get the free version now. They used to have .deb and .rpm files that you could just download.

                              gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • gjacobseG
                                gjacobse @stacksofplates
                                last edited by

                                @johnhooks
                                While I prefer free - open source - I'm okay with the low cost long time usage of the software.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • gjacobseG
                                  gjacobse
                                  last edited by

                                  Just flipped over to my trackball mouse. It is a four button - adding back and forward navigation - and those extra buttons work through Synergy. Scroll wheel works too...

                                  Nice.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • gjacobseG
                                    gjacobse
                                    last edited by

                                    Think at this point - going to mark this as Solved.

                                    Awesome..

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • 1 / 1
                                    • First post
                                      Last post