ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Need Vista Home OEM image

    IT Discussion
    vista oem
    13
    65
    12.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      With Vista I thought you Had to install SP1 first because of the major changes from RTM to SP1?

      I'll have to confirm that tomorrow.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        I was pretty sure.

        https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/948465

        Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) is a prerequisite for installing SP2 in Windows Vista. If you use Windows Update or the Automatic Update feature in Windows Vista, you will not be offered the option to install SP2 until you first install SP1.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

            Is it any weirder than the NT 4.0 setup you wrote about above?

            The changes were so drastic in SP1 that it barely resembled the RTM.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

              Is it any weirder than the NT 4.0 setup you wrote about above?

              The changes were so drastic in SP1 that it barely resembled the RTM.

              Yes, because the terms were not explicitly to mean that until after NT.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1
              • 2
              • 3
              • 4
              • 4 / 4
              • First post
                Last post