ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Facebook privacy hoaxes prey on your fears -- again

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    18 Posts 7 Posters 3.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Just saw someone in our community hit by the FB privacy hoax this morning before coming over here to check the latest. It hits a lot of IT people too.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • nadnerBN
        nadnerB
        last edited by

        That particular one has been going around for years.
        Sheeple are for to quick to hit the panic button. Research it before passing OMGWTFBBQHAX! things on.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • art_of_shredA
          art_of_shred
          last edited by

          smh.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @nadnerB
            last edited by

            @nadnerB said:

            That particular one has been going around for years.
            Sheeple are for to quick to hit the panic button. Research it before passing OMGWTFBBQHAX! things on.

            Yes, I thought that it was weird to see a famous hoax about privacy repeated again. Hard to believe that people would still think that it is something valid. It's pretty obviously not valid based on common sense, basic law, Facebook's own privacy rules, the terms of service and the broad amount of knowledge of the issue directly (it's one of those common "I cant believe that people do this" things that people talk about all of the time when referring to hoaxes.)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              facebook permission

              nadnerBN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • nadnerBN
                nadnerB
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller when common sense is no longer taught commonly, can it still be called common sense?

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @nadnerB
                  last edited by

                  @nadnerB said:

                  @scottalanmiller when common sense is no longer taught commonly, can it still be called common sense?

                  Can you teach common sense? Knowledge can be taught, sense has to be there.

                  nadnerBN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nadnerBN
                    nadnerB @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    facebook permission

                    I can't upvote that enough.
                    👍

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • nadnerBN
                      nadnerB @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @nadnerB said:

                      @scottalanmiller when common sense is no longer taught commonly, can it still be called common sense?

                      Can you teach common sense? Knowledge can be taught, sense has to be there.

                      It's picked up by kids observing their parents and yes, other bits are taught (like looking both ways before crossing the street).

                      You have to be teachable for it to sink in. A lot of people are not teachable.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        I think common sense tells you to look both ways without needing to be taught. Learning by rote teaches you to do things without needed to have the sense to do it anyway. You can teach people to appear to have common sense in repeatable scenarios but only sense is going to help you in a new scenario.

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          I think common sense tells you to look both ways without needing to be taught. Learning by rote teaches you to do things without needed to have the sense to do it anyway. You can teach people to appear to have common sense in repeatable scenarios but only sense is going to help you in a new scenario.

                          A child does not just know to look both ways. they have to be taught. A child with sense learns to understand why they were taught.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @JaredBusch said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            I think common sense tells you to look both ways without needing to be taught. Learning by rote teaches you to do things without needed to have the sense to do it anyway. You can teach people to appear to have common sense in repeatable scenarios but only sense is going to help you in a new scenario.

                            A child does not just know to look both ways. they have to be taught. A child with sense learns to understand why they were taught.

                            Agreed, but an adult with common sense that knows what a road is but has never been taught would, we would assume, decide to look both ways without needing to be taught. Roads must be taught because we can't trust that common sense exists as it is too common an issue and too deadly a result and we need children to be able to do it before they have the sense to understand the risks and we need them to do it before they have the knowledge with which to have applied common sense. Common sense needs knowledge to work from, much like a CPU is only useful if there is data in memory to process.

                            nadnerBN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • nadnerBN
                              nadnerB @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              Agreed, but an adult with common sense that knows what a road is but has never been taught would, we would assume, decide to look both ways without needing to be taught. Roads must be taught because we can't trust that common sense exists as it is too common an issue and too deadly a result and we need children to be able to do it before they have the sense to understand the risks and we need them to do it before they have the knowledge with which to have applied common sense. Common sense needs knowledge to work from, much like a CPU is only useful if there is data in memory to process.

                              Wait, are you agreeing while looking like you're disagreeing or just disagreeing?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                Agreeing about children needing to be taught but explaining why that is different than a common sense discussion because they don't have the tools yet to use common sense in that scenario by the time that they are taught what common sense alone could tell them later.

                                nadnerBN dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • nadnerBN
                                  nadnerB @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller Righto

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • dafyreD
                                    dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by dafyre

                                    @scottalanmiller This is why you start em young. I tell my kid not to touch the pot because it is hot. He knows what hot is. If he touches the pot anyway, lesson reinforced. He's only 4, but I explain to him why I don't want him to do something... If it won't kill him or seroiusly injure him, I let him do it anyway. Then he learns to check and see if what he wants to do will hurt him or not before diving in head first, so to speak.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1 / 1
                                    • First post
                                      Last post