@favianmedina Does it reach the print queue, what happens? Will it print when you print directly to the printer (with USB Cable)?
Posts made by CCWTech
-
RE: Dymo labelwriter 550 over IOGear print server installation
-
RE: Dymo labelwriter 550 over IOGear print server installation
@favianmedina Right, that's a 450. You posted about a 550. Are they using Dymo brand labels?
-
RE: Dymo labelwriter 550 over IOGear print server installation
@favianmedina Are they using DYMO brand lables? The Dymo 550 will only print with DYMO branded lablels.
-
RE: Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
AFAIK, Even VNC doesn't work on Wayland yet.
Nor does MeshCentral
Really? Now I need to go try that when I have a minute.
I just confirmed that mine is working on the default Fedora 37 desktop using both Firefox and Chromium.
Wayland with MeshCentral?
You SURE you are on Wayland?
Isn't Wayland the default for Fedora now? I'm using the stock Fedora, so I'm thinking I am.
Double check that. Maybe you updated from something with X.org.
Fresh install. Wiped root before installing (it was way behind, no point in upgrading).
Do you have NVIDIA drivers on the system? Those will revert you back to X.Org
Yep, sure do. Guess it's not wayland then.
You can check with
loginctl
and
'''
loginctl show-session -p Type <sessionid>loginctl show-session -p Type 2
Type=wayland
Well shoot, are my Nvidia drivers not working? The more I find out, the more things I need to look at/fix.
What do you have it set to use?
-
RE: Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@travisdh1 said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@scottalanmiller said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
AFAIK, Even VNC doesn't work on Wayland yet.
Nor does MeshCentral
Really? Now I need to go try that when I have a minute.
I just confirmed that mine is working on the default Fedora 37 desktop using both Firefox and Chromium.
Wayland with MeshCentral?
You SURE you are on Wayland?
Isn't Wayland the default for Fedora now? I'm using the stock Fedora, so I'm thinking I am.
Double check that. Maybe you updated from something with X.org.
Fresh install. Wiped root before installing (it was way behind, no point in upgrading).
Do you have NVIDIA drivers on the system? Those will revert you back to X.Org
Yep, sure do. Guess it's not wayland then.
No reason to guess:$ echo $XDG_SESSION_TYPE
x11 -
RE: Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?
@Pete-S said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
The info below is from Debian but should be the same under Ubuntu.
GDM (GNOME Display Manager) will automatically use Wayland when supported, except when using the proprietary NVIDIA driver, in which case it will fall back to X11 due to instability.
To use the X11 backend by default, uncomment the
WaylandEnable=false
line in the/etc/gdm3/daemon.conf
file.It is using NVIDIA Drivers so that must be why. Thanks!
-
RE: Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?
@dafyre said in Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?:
I don't think you should care, really -- as long as your stuff is working how you want it to.
I prefer X11 still because of support for things like VNC and such. When Wayland gets that ironed out good, I may consider switching again.
Kinda what I was thinking but my OCD makes me think of it as 'broken'... LOL. Thanks!
-
Running X11 - Ubuntu 22.10 - Should I care?
I am running X11 on Ubuntu 22.10. First of all, I am not sure if I should really care that I am not using Wayland. I don't know how much of a big deal it is or if I should just be happy things seem to be working well.
I AM Running Nvida for video - I have seen in the past where this MAY be a cause but I don't know if that is still true.
On the login screen, I do NOT have a gear icon so I can choose the session I want to use for some reason.
The only edit that I have made is that in grub I changed this line:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="text nomodeset"
- I like having the text on bootup instead of the regular screen because, I think it looks cool. Yeah, I know... Silly but I like it.
- The nomodeset is required because without it it gets stuck on boot... An issue with NVIDIA.
So I am not sure if it's a big deal or not it's just weird to me that in previous versions of Ubuntu I did see I could change.
-
RE: Ubuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-50-generic won't boot
Found the problem and fixed it.
For anyone else having this problem:
sudo nano /etc/default/grub
Change this line: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
To: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash nomodeset"sudo update-grub
-
RE: Ubuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-50-generic won't boot
I am running the latest BIOS for the computer (released in August)
-
Ubuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-50-generic won't boot
When I boot my PC into Ubuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-50-generic it doesn't boot. I just get what's on this screen and it hangs.
If I select Ubuntu with Linux 5.15.0-48-generic I get the very same screen but then it asks me for the disk encryption password (encrypted as a part of loading Linux [no 3rd party tools]) then boots to the login screen where I enter my password and everything works fine.
Of course when I update to 50 and reboot it no longer boots.
I know I am probably using the wrong terms but trying my best to describe the issue.
-
RE: Windows Defender Application Control
@flaxking said in Windows Defender Application Control:
@obsolesce said in Windows Defender Application Control:
@ccwtech said in Windows Defender Application Control:
@obsolesce said in Windows Defender Application Control:
@ccwtech said in Windows Defender Application Control:
Has anyone played with Windows Defender Application Control, specifically Group Policy to turn it on for each workstation?
I have a request from a client to do this, but I am very leery of using group policy for something like this.
Are they all running Win 10 Enterprise?
For sure no... Win 10 Pro.
Then it won't work as it's a requirement.
I think specifically it's using Group Policy for WDAC that's enterprise edition only, right?
Yes, you can use it in Pro, just not enforced by a GPO
-
RE: Windows Defender Application Control
@obsolesce said in Windows Defender Application Control:
Then it won't work as it's a requirement.
Well that's easy. Thanks!
-
RE: Windows Defender Application Control
@obsolesce said in Windows Defender Application Control:
@ccwtech said in Windows Defender Application Control:
Has anyone played with Windows Defender Application Control, specifically Group Policy to turn it on for each workstation?
I have a request from a client to do this, but I am very leery of using group policy for something like this.
Are they all running Win 10 Enterprise?
For sure no... Win 10 Pro.
-
Windows Defender Application Control
Has anyone played with Windows Defender Application Control, specifically Group Policy to turn it on for each workstation?
I have a request from a client to do this, but I am very leery of using group policy for something like this.
-
RE: Unable to adopt USG Pro into Unifi Controller - Server Reject
@krzykat This wouldn't have been that. Was just worth getting an RMA and starting fresh.
-
RE: Unable to adopt USG Pro into Unifi Controller - Server Reject
The new router arrived and adopted without any issues. It would have been nice to try the old router since the MTU changed so we know which of the two was the fix, but I am happy to report all is working well with the new router in place.
Sending in the old one for RMA credit.
-
RE: Unable to adopt USG Pro into Unifi Controller - Server Reject
@dashrender I think I tried as low as 1400 but not that low.
-
RE: Unable to adopt USG Pro into Unifi Controller - Server Reject
@dashrender Even tried that and it adopts. I tried to then migrate from that local controller to the online one and no luck. I had the ISP make a change (increase MTU) and going to try when the new one arrives tomorrow. Hopefully that will fix the issue.