Why is VMWare considered so often
-
So it must be a agent based backup client that Unitrends uses to protect VM's on ESXi Free.
And it's limited to 1TB of data protection. Which may work for tiny environments but that could very quickly cease to be feasible as the business grows.
-
Yeah my bad I always just say Xen, When I should be using XenServer
It's installing 6.5 now on a spare server. Once up will be looing for the guide I think in on ML for XO install and setup -
@hobbit666 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
Yeah my bad I always just say Xen, When I should be using XenServer
It's installing 6.5 now on a spare server. Once up will be looing for the guide I think in on ML for XO install and setup
-
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
But you can build a solution that scales today for free. No cost, so again choosing ESXi Free (or any version of ESXi) is a total waste of money.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
But would you ever install a software that didn't have features you needed today, but you may need tomorrow?
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
But would you ever install a software that didn't have features you needed today, but you may need tomorrow?
But he's not installing it, it's already there.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
But would you ever install a software that didn't have features you needed today, but you may need tomorrow?
But he's not installing it, it's already there.
I'm specifically referring to the link in the OP of this topic.
What @Carnival-Boy has is a pair of jade shaded glasses on. He would be wise to rip it out if it's not doing the job he needs today. And to do the job he needs (if something changed) he'd have to rip out his current setup anyways and perform a clean install anyways.
-
The different versions of ESXi aren't "upgradeable" from platform version to platform version if I recall correctly.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
If the business grows, switch to something else. That's partly the beauty of free, simple products. Use them today. When (or if) business needs change replace them with something else. It's only when there is a big initial investment in a solution (in terms of money and time) that you need really need to focus on scaling in the future. IT solutions can be a lot more dynamic and short-term now than when I started out.
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
But would you ever install a software that didn't have features you needed today, but you may need tomorrow?
But he's not installing it, it's already there.
I'm specifically referring to the link in the OP of this topic.
Oh yeah, no, that's crazy.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
That's very true. I would never choose ESXi Free to deploy today. But that doesn't mean that you should rip it out for the sake of ripping it out, either.
Exactly. I'm experienced in ESXi, I like it, and at the moment it does what I need. If I was starting out again, I wouldn't bother learning it, mainly because I don't see it having any long term future. I'd almost certainly use Hyper-V because I'm a bit of a Microsoft fanboy. Or if I had any interest in hypervisors I'd probably rip it out just for fun, but I don't.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
The different versions of ESXi aren't "upgradeable" from platform version to platform version if I recall correctly.
What do you mean? I'm not clear on what isn't able to be done.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
The different versions of ESXi aren't "upgradeable" from platform version to platform version if I recall correctly.
What do you mean? I'm not clear on what isn't able to be done.
VMware licenses are all handled by the key you have installed. If you need to upgrade to more features... just shell out the money and add your new license key to the system, and done.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
Oh yeah, no, that's crazy.
I don't think it's crazy. Like me, the OP has experience of ESXi. So what I wrote applies to him, as well as me. It may be simple to learn another hypervisor, but why bother if you're not that interested and you're familiar with a hypervisor that will do the job you currently need?
-
@dafyre said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@DustinB3403 said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
The different versions of ESXi aren't "upgradeable" from platform version to platform version if I recall correctly.
What do you mean? I'm not clear on what isn't able to be done.
VMware licenses are all handled by the key you have installed. If you need to upgrade to more features... just shell out the money and add your new license key to the system, and done.
So the Backup API's are magically installed if you upgrade your key from "ESXi Free" to "ESXi Essentials"? I thought they were completely removed from the installation.
Just not there, and to get them you had to install the Essentials ISO to your host.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
@scottalanmiller said in Why is VMWare considered so often:
Oh yeah, no, that's crazy.
I don't think it's crazy. Like me, the OP has experience of ESXi. So what I wrote applies to him, as well as me. It may be simple to learn another hypervisor, but why bother if you're not that interested and you're familiar with a hypervisor that will do the job you currently need?
He doesn't have ESXi experience. He's just being told to use ESXi. He colleague is telling him to use Hyper-V.
-
He wrote "My experience before I moved to vcenter"
This implies he currently uses vcenter and he previously used ESXi free.
-
@coliver said
That's the worst. I had to build my home lab twice to before I remembered that option.
Yes, terrible interface to not highlight that choice.
Everything else is awesome.
-
Something to keep in mind about current ESXi Free deployments is that up until less than two years ago, nearly everyone was recommending them (when money mattered.) Hyper-V was not mature yet (maybe still isn't) and XenServer was still crap under Citrix and KVM was (is) too hard to use on its own. It was ESXi for people who needed a GUI and straight Xen for people who needed power at a low cost. Those were the choices.
So tons of ESXi Free is not so new as to have been deployed when it wasn't one of the only two viable choices. That VMware makes no sense to deploy is a pretty recent change since Citrix donated XS to TLF and since Hyper-V has caught up a bit.
